Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
2. It doesn't need to do so.
Sat Jul 2, 2016, 01:54 PM
Jul 2016

There is no GMO sugar cane. It is already known that sugar cane, which is a very non-environmentally friendly way to get sugar, is where most of the non-GMO sugar will be derived.

It's not about an agenda, other than the agenda of the anti-GMO con artists. It's about reality. Can you live with reality? Or do you want to continue to pretend that anti-GMO nonsense has no negative consequences for the planet?

http://fafdl.org/blog/2016/04/12/another-not-so-sweet-victory-for-the-anti-gmo-movement/

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Non-GMO sugar plays major...»Reply #2