Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Green Forest

(232 posts)

6. Hillary's "electability" is based on name recognition, not an actual record of winning tough races.

Reply to draa (Original post)

Sat Jan 16, 2016, 04:25 AM

Jan 2016

When people get to know Hillary's unlikeable, untrustworthy, lying Rovian self in a tough race, as they did in 2008, she loses. Fast forward to 2016....

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

According Clinton, in 2008 Obama wasn't electable either... [View all] draa Jan 2016 OP

Bill Clinton's point was that Obama wouldn't necessarily get the nomination. Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #1

Which is the same argument being made today. draa Jan 2016 #2

yeah, we heard a lot of that. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #3

Hillary in 2008: "He cannot win." Ino Jan 2016 #4

Hahaha, was she freaking out when she said that. draa Jan 2016 #5

Her actual meaning is kind of up in the air... Ino Jan 2016 #7

Hillary's "electability" is based on name recognition, not an actual record of winning tough races. Green Forest Jan 2016 #6