Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Beacool

(30,520 posts)
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 02:47 AM Jan 2016

Bernie Sanders’s single-payer plan isn’t a plan at all [View all]

Sanders' long-awaited health care plan is, by turns, vague and unrealistic.

Hillary Clinton has made a lot of bad arguments about Bernie Sanders's support for single payer. But her best argument was her simplest: with mere weeks to go before the Iowa caucuses, Sanders still hadn't released any details about his plan. And absent a real plan no one could really say what he was proposing, or whether it was a good idea. As Clinton said in an interview with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, "the devil's in the details when it comes to health care."

On Sunday night, mere hours before the fourth Democratic debate, Sanders tried to head off Clinton's attacks by releasing his plan. Only what he released isn't a plan. It is, to be generous, a gesture towards a future plan.

To be less generous — but perhaps more accurate — this is a document that lets Sanders say he has a plan, but doesn't answer the most important questions about how his plan would work, or what it would mean for most Americans. Sanders is detailed and specific in response to the three main attacks Clinton has launched, but is vague or unrealistic on virtually every other issue. The result is that he answers Clinton's criticisms while raising much more profound questions about his own ideas.

--------

In the absence of these kinds of specifics, Sanders has offered a puppies-and-rainbows approach to single-payer — he promises his plan will cover everything while costing the average family almost nothing. This is what Republicans fear liberals truly believe: that they can deliver expansive, unlimited benefits to the vast majority of Americans by stacking increasingly implausible, and economically harmful, taxes on the rich. Sanders is proving them right.

http://www.vox.com/2016/1/17/10784528/bernie-sanders-single-payer-health-care




67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's a chimera. Congress will never pass it. His math is vague, too. MADem Jan 2016 #1
Ideologues work within a small area using broad strokes- KittyWampus Jan 2016 #47
Sounds like his too-big-to-fail bill. ucrdem Jan 2016 #2
As a Sanders supporter, I am sad to have to agree with Ezra Klein. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #3
It gives people a very good look at what to expect. Do all candidates release massive, completed in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #5
You're right, but I think he needs more evidence that what he is proposing can work. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #6
Why wouldn't it work? Kentonio Jan 2016 #17
Oh I think it *can* work, but it requires diligence to ensure that the plan put forward will. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #18
I don't disagree, but at this moment in time a huge policy document Kentonio Jan 2016 #19
+1. You're right. I just hope they have more specifics in mind, that this isn't the extent JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #23
I doubt this is the extent. Kentonio Jan 2016 #26
We are fortunate in that we can look at the many existing single payer plans to see what JDPriestly Jan 2016 #35
I assume you are kidding, right? mikehiggins Jan 2016 #25
No, I'm not kidding. Yes it answers HRC's disingenuous attacks. It does not completely satisfy me. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #27
Um... This is more than a "devil is in the details" scenario. Meldread Jan 2016 #29
If your claims are true, then why do France and the UK, just to cite two examples, JDPriestly Jan 2016 #31
They do deliver it for a fraction of the cost. Meldread Jan 2016 #37
By paying providers much less than we do Recursion Jan 2016 #41
France must have changed its plan. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #64
Perinatal care and some surgeries are exempt Recursion Jan 2016 #65
France enid602 Jan 2016 #52
I think the concept is what is important at this point Armstead Jan 2016 #45
Considering the fact this is Sanders wheelhouse and it's the best he can come up with? KittyWampus Jan 2016 #48
Can we at least wait until Robert Reich looks at it and not rely on Ezra Klein. draa Jan 2016 #8
Can someone brief me on why Ezra Klein is bad? I seem to have missed it. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #15
For one, he's not an economist as far as I know. draa Jan 2016 #22
I knew it was Ezra before I clicked the link. in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #4
Hillary lost the debate on health care. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #7
No, she defended ACA and Sanders couldn't. That's a win for Hill. nt ucrdem Jan 2016 #10
The audience gasped Kalidurga Jan 2016 #11
Indeed-- Bernie was powerful on healthcare, Hillary really flailed Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #46
Oh, she loves insurance companies leeching off of us! Do you too! Yay for you! cascadiance Jan 2016 #28
+1, Sanders WOULDN'T defend ACA... he didn't like it from the beginning. uponit7771 Jan 2016 #33
So her plan is to tinker with the ACA.... Armymedic88 Jan 2016 #9
Welcom to DU Kalidurga Jan 2016 #12
Thanks for the Welcome Armymedic88 Jan 2016 #14
If Clinton gets the Dem nomination, who will you support for Pres? uppityperson Jan 2016 #56
I will support progressive dems on the local level Armymedic88 Jan 2016 #57
That is good, and for Pres? uppityperson Jan 2016 #58
I honestly havent decided because that had yet to occur Armymedic88 Jan 2016 #61
If I were queen of the universe, things would be different. uppityperson Jan 2016 #62
I guess the question is if GP6971 Jan 2016 #59
"Puppies-and-rainbows approach". Yup, sounds familiar. (eom) oasis Jan 2016 #13
He addressed that during the debate AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #16
He posts on the sensible center.com? ejbr Jan 2016 #20
Gee, memory fails me Kall Jan 2016 #21
Obama promised savings of $2500 per family n/t MichMan Jan 2016 #44
Vermont proved that. nt SunSeeker Jan 2016 #24
The only reason that Bernie's plan seems vague is that those who criticize it have not JDPriestly Jan 2016 #30
The problem with this plan has nothing to do with it being vague. Meldread Jan 2016 #34
Yet European plans are cheaper than ours and far more generous. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #36
I am not saying that Single Payer isn't cheaper than the overall system we have right now. Meldread Jan 2016 #38
His plan does indeed cost 'essentially nothing' when compared to what we now have eridani Jan 2016 #40
That was snuffed out in the first line where employers were to pay 6.2% and not pass a dime of it .. uponit7771 Jan 2016 #32
employers currently providing health insurance will on average be paying much less Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #43
So Hillary's plan is for the 28 million uninsured to fuck off and die? eridani Jan 2016 #39
No, it's not Hillary's plan. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #49
Considering the Sanders plan is pie in the sky underfunded nonsense mythology Jan 2016 #54
"Underfunding" is pure unadulterated horseshit. We are currently paying nearly twice-- eridani Jan 2016 #66
That's absurd!!! Beacool Jan 2016 #63
I'm sure glad you aren't trying to sell my used car for me. eridani Jan 2016 #67
wtf - it is almost identical to the bill he filed in 2013 in the senate and is a plan. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #42
HRC's "plan": 32 million Americans can just Fuck off and die. - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #50
Similar to his Too Big To Fail Bill. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #51
Ezra Klein is correct in his analysis Gothmog Jan 2016 #53
huge K&R taught_me_patience Jan 2016 #55
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #60
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders’s single-p...»Reply #0