Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I was pushed polled last night in Iowa; Hillary sinks lower than whale poo [View all]Agschmid
(28,749 posts)21. I don't doubt that...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
304 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I was pushed polled last night in Iowa; Hillary sinks lower than whale poo [View all]
CoffeeCat
Jan 2016
OP
So, you're suggesting that the caller didn't say the things that I reported? (nt)
CoffeeCat
Jan 2016
#42
So you are saying that other than the one or two sentence questions that might be easy to
greiner3
Jan 2016
#68
"No facts of any kind" is what you said. That means it is all untrue, all false, you are calling the
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#269
No saying that there "are no facts of any kind"... Is NOT calling the OP a liar.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#271
Since you clearly need to review the basics, here is the definition of the verb 'to lie':
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#276
Yes and I used "verbatim" so if your point is they have different meanings... YES.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#277
You said the OP had no facts of any kind. You need to prove that assertion or drop that smear.
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#281
I got the gist. The call was from Hillary's campaign. The objective was to paint Bernie as bad on FP
sabrina 1
Jan 2016
#253
'not verbatim' is one thing, you stated 'No facts of any kind'. You called the OP a liar, and that
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#268
Nope didn't call the OP a liar, that's just the frame you all came up with to attack.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#272
Well you did not call her a liar verbatim but that was the sense of your declaration that the OP had
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#280
Then why did you allow yourself language which said otherwise? 'No facts of any kind. Par for the
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#293
And there's the implied "You didn't mean to say somthing untrue... but you still lied".
Bubzer
Jan 2016
#300
I was push polled about Elizabeth Edward's cancer (in Iowa during 2008 Dem Caucus campaign)
CoffeeCat
Jan 2016
#109
That's not what you did. You said there were no facts. The OP stated the facts.
cui bono
Jan 2016
#71
You are the bully here. You are the one who claimed without any supporting evidence that the OP is
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#283
It's not unjustified at all, and again I certainly did not call the OP a liar.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#264
You have a wonderful way with words! Amazing to not believe a story or register its simple meaning.
highprincipleswork
Jan 2016
#28
He had to rush his response to get the first response slot within 3 minutes. Not easy. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#237
Your objection goes to the weight of the evidence not its admissibility n/t
DefenseLawyer
Jan 2016
#18
It could have been one of her superpacs. Bernie doesn't have to worry about that kind of thing
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#187
Again I did not once question the fact that the OP got the call, nor the content of the call.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#202
I've been push-polled. When you get push-polled, you know the motive behind the call.
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#213
But you did. You said 'No facts of any kind'. That means no facts, of any kind. That means no call
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2016
#286
No. The op said he/she paraphrased because they don't remember every word verbatim
cali
Jan 2016
#36
So they don't remember every word verbatim, is different than they don't remember parts of the call?
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#38
Geeze, you're getting the same push poll tactic used on you that the caller used on Bernie!
ebayfool
Jan 2016
#154
I am willing to bet a very large amount of money that the phrassing the OP used here
randys1
Jan 2016
#27
Thanks for the informative post. I'm sure you related the conversation to a very high degree of
A Simple Game
Jan 2016
#149
Wow a first reply in 3 minutes. But you don't get full credit because you hurried your response.
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#236
It's more than a coincidence that HRC supporters are often the very first to respond to
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#252
It's ridiculous that you think anyone who disagrees with you must be paid by the other campaign.
Agschmid
Jan 2016
#262
LOL - Well done!! I bet that push-poller might reconsider who THEY are voting/caucusing for
99th_Monkey
Jan 2016
#3
I suspect that Biden, at his age and after so many tragedies, is inclined not to
tblue37
Jan 2016
#196
Next thing you know she will pose with a Hayden Fry cutout wearing a seed cap, next to a tractor.
Still In Wisconsin
Jan 2016
#49
How could I forget Hayden Fry? He beat our butts for a couple of decades.
Still In Wisconsin
Jan 2016
#227
I was push polled in 2007 too, in Iowa; Caller brought up Elizabeth Edward's cancer.
CoffeeCat
Jan 2016
#60
Good grief! And yet you were able to access your humor, which is remarkable in itself.
Duval
Jan 2016
#168
People tend to speak freely here... until they get tombstoned, that is. nt
thereismore
Jan 2016
#101
Maybe because the Clintons built their national reputation using vicious attacks against Democrats?
ieoeja
Jan 2016
#110
The Democratic Party has not only shrunk since the DLC, it has leaned to the right.
Duval
Jan 2016
#177
Your comments to the person on the phone were vicious attacks on Hillary, no?
oberliner
Jan 2016
#141
Because most Democrats care more about a person's record than the letter after their name. (nt)
jeff47
Jan 2016
#139
man, if you can get her backers' hired pollsters laughing that's a bad sign for her
MisterP
Jan 2016
#114
What a dumb poll. You don't even have to know anything about the candidates
winter is coming
Jan 2016
#124
I truly hate to see Dems be so nasty about the candidate that is not their
amuse bouche
Jan 2016
#155
That's low but they WILL go lower. Remember the voter suppression robocalls from 2008?
pa28
Jan 2016
#165
I can't help from wondering if anyone can veify that the received the same call.
olegramps
Jan 2016
#201