2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Ta-Nehisi Coates: Why Precisely Is Bernie Sanders Against Reparations? [View all]TheBlackAdder
(29,946 posts).
The red herring is this political distraction that I am witnessing, trying to force another issue because your candidate supports it.
The main issue is that slavery was legal before 1865, so there is no legal standing for descendants. Any form of slavery afterwards could be required by those who directly perpetrated it, as it would have been illegal. But, you are not interested in legal fact.
What you should focus on is institutional racism and income disparity. But, again, if a settlement is something that you are looking for, it needs to be proven on a case by case basis. And seeing how the American society slowly evolved since 1865, and the setbacks to the African Americans brought on by Booker T. Washington (note: I am a fan of W. E. B. DuBois), this will be difficult to prove. This is akin to how the Jews, Asians and others were quarantined to sections of cities, withheld from banking and various industry.
The only way you will see correction is not by some passively slow progress, but by an institutional disruption.
If you took politics courses, you'd know this. I know you haven't based off of the posts fielded.
.