2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Ta-Nehisi Coates: Why Precisely Is Bernie Sanders Against Reparations? [View all]Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)I think the answer is that Bernie is very much a pragmatist. For example, rather than opposing the ACA (which is very regressive in some of its provisions) he negotiated hard to get everything he could for poor and working people and got over $12B added to the bill for community health centers.
The same argument could be made on Big Oil. Why doesn't he advocate for the federal government to nationalize Exxon, etc.? Because there is no popular support for it, just as there is no popular support for reparations. He could also call for the removal of almost all American troops from overseas and a huge reduction in military spending. These are other ideas which are good but not politically feasible yet. If he was running as a purist, e.g. like Dennis Kucinich, we would not even be having this conversation because he wouldn't be politically relevant.
Bernie's platform is filled with common sense progressive ideas supported at least by a majority of Americans, because he is an outsider who intends to actually win the White House and effect the greatest changes in American politics since FDR. The reason he is very popular and has great momentum is because he is a master of shaping a progressive agenda which is doable and popular. That is how he created the miracle in Burlington.
Reparations now is not politically feasible, but raising the minimum wage to $15 is. Creating urban youth programs to get kids jobs is. Hiring millions for jobs for decent childcare and rebuilding our infrastructure and transitioning to a green economy, these are politically feasible for a dynamic president. They are not labeled as reparations because all ethnic groups will benefit, but the beauty of Bernie's fulfillment of the New Deal is that this time, unlike under FDR, this will be an inclusive program. So it will have some of the practical effect of reparations without the label.