Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
11. I don't think that's very smart
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:41 PM
Jan 2016




This man McCullough is still investigating as the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. If he encounters one of those coin toss judgments (or less), he might as well nail Hillary as she's impugned his reputation and if she's elected, he won't have a job. She hasn't made a bad situation any better because she's drawing attention to the above letter - which doesn't look good on Hillary no matter what is said or why. Apparently one of the SAP classified emails is about drones - and the public will largely find that the rules are the rules when it comes to top secret documents about drone strikes (as much as many don't like them).

I thought Hillary was supposed to be smarter than that.

If she's worried about the timing of this coming out, well, I have a feeling we haven't seen anything yet compared with what is to come and the timing. For example, they could announce Bryan Pagliano immunity deal just before Super Tuesday. Awful timing for her for sure and politically motivated for sure but there's nothing she can do about it. She put herself in this position.

It's why I continue to think she's going to have a very tough time getting elected if she wins the primary. They have volumes of stuff like this they can use to taint her candidacy.
Did she brush it off like with a cloth or something? tularetom Jan 2016 #1
*major snort!* nt restorefreedom Jan 2016 #29
He he azmom Jan 2016 #33
I find it interesting ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #2
I find it interesting when a post on DU pivots the subject to a DUer. morningfog Jan 2016 #3
Speaking of distractions, Hillary's statement attempts a slight of hand that a novice magician sorechasm Jan 2016 #12
I Don't Know What To Believe Here... What I DO Believe... WillyT Jan 2016 #4
Dear Willy: an article from NBC today you might be interested in. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #6
Well, if you can't trust DiFi, who can you trust? Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #9
Read the full article, Mr. DeMontague emulatorloo Jan 2016 #10
Do you really think someone with this kind of track record on IT security Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #13
You are changing the subject. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #18
Neither am I. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #20
Hey, it is totally cool if you don't want to read the NBC article that covers Willy's topic. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #23
You're right, I stopped at Dianne Feinstein. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #24
Lol difi has similar effect on me. However as I noted, she's not the main source. emulatorloo Jan 2016 #41
I'm confident that this is just another "leaked" tip that fizzles. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #7
Even As A Bernie Supporter, I Hope You're Correct... But They Can Dribble This Shit Out... WillyT Jan 2016 #14
LOL ... WillyT said, as he dribbled. LOL. eom 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #15
Oh... Sorry... I Thought You Were Serious. WillyT Jan 2016 #17
Oh. I am serious. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #26
Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #31
Wow ... Who knew two jurors would see ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #32
It was a silly alert. fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #35
Hmm. kenfrequed Jan 2016 #27
Kind of weird she refers to this information as "another leak" 2banon Jan 2016 #21
So Obama's FBI is part of a right-wing conspiracy? (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #22
No, that's not what I'm suggesting.. 2banon Jan 2016 #36
Uh, yeah. It is. Because it's an FBI investigation. jeff47 Jan 2016 #37
there seems to be some sort of circular debate which I'm not interested 2banon Jan 2016 #39
absolutely agree. unfortunately, she is not concerned with "everyone" restorefreedom Jan 2016 #30
No more interesting than Hillary Clinton wanting to keep her own email private one month Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #8
+1 kath Jan 2016 #40
It's a vast right wing conspiracy - just said in different terms. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #5
I don't think that's very smart Jarqui Jan 2016 #11
I Know... First The Dismissiveness, Then The Accusations... WTF ??? WillyT Jan 2016 #16
She might be splitting hairs if she's denying using the server for anything "marked" classified JudyM Jan 2016 #19
I still don't understand the arrogance of bringing in a personal server into the land mind of sorechasm Jan 2016 #25
I'm afraid I agree, and am sad and disappointed in her judgment. Focusing on her personal needs JudyM Jan 2016 #28
Absolutely correct. She's not fit azmom Jan 2016 #34
They weren't "marked" because she instructed her aide to remove the "marks" Oilwellian Jan 2016 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Wow... Talk About Playing...»Reply #11