Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
24. Bingo.
Sat Sep 22, 2012, 01:59 PM
Sep 2012

You said it perfectly. Reagan masked his deficiencies by being extremely likable and charismatic. The same, really, applies to Bill Clinton, who was also able to bounce back from pitfalls because Americans loved him. No Republican has been able to tap into that Reagan love since ... even though they've tried. Bush was a 50+1 president and was only able to expand beyond that in the wake of 9/11 ... but even that got him, in 2004, pretty much 50+1 against Kerry!

No one likes Reaganomics. No one. I haven't found one person, outside the fanatic right, who says, "oh yeah ... that was a good idea!". It's why Democrats like Bill Clinton and Barack Obama can run against it, attack it, and score points for it. The problem is that Republicans today are still pushing it ... but they can't sell it because they're not Reagan. Americans don't like it.

So, they're pushing the failed Reagan policies no one likes without the thing that got 'em pushed in the first place - a charismatic president who people liked. He was like the old family member everyone loved ... even when he screwed up. THEY EVEN CALLED HIM UNCLE RONNIE!

"Aww, Uncle Ronnie got drunk, pulled down his pants and showed the whole family his pecker ... isn't he a hoot?"

But when Mitt Romney does the same thing, no one finds it cute.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow. Sounds like Raz may be throwing in the towel. DCBob Sep 2012 #1
I was surprised by the Ras PA poll TroyD Sep 2012 #3
Me too. DCBob Sep 2012 #4
This is where Howard Dean and BHO came from quaker bill Sep 2012 #2
Interesting... DCBob Sep 2012 #5
That was Reagan's main strength TroyD Sep 2012 #7
Yes indeed. DCBob Sep 2012 #12
Bingo. Drunken Irishman Sep 2012 #24
Scott Rasmussen is dreaming of a "21st century Ronald Reagan" Kolesar Sep 2012 #6
Yes Cosmocat Sep 2012 #8
All cons have a pipe dream of a reincarnated Reagan to lead them to victory. DCBob Sep 2012 #13
what Rasmussen means is that far-right, tea party type Republicans will dominate ..I think he is Douglas Carpenter Sep 2012 #9
stick a fork in romney. make that two forks. buzzman Sep 2012 #10
It is all pure and unmitigated BULLSHIT Cosmocat Sep 2012 #11
He pretty much guarantees that the 2016 GOP primaries will be 2012 redux magical thyme Sep 2012 #14
Reagan Would Have The Same Problem As Rmoney DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #15
Yep, the demographic shifts are largely responsible for making many states fujiyama Sep 2012 #20
I Have As Much Chance As Becoming Governor Of CA As Ronald Reagan Would Have If He Was Alive DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #21
This has been my wet dream for a while now smorkingapple Sep 2012 #16
It's Amazing How Few Analysts Realize How Demographic Trends Are Driving This Election DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #17
Republicanism is a fossil trying to exist in the 21st century... and-justice-for-all Sep 2012 #18
So Cain/Bachmann 2016? Please Teabaggers, make it so! nt sufrommich Sep 2012 #19
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #22
enjoy your stay. WI_DEM Sep 2012 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rasmussen: Romney May Be ...»Reply #24