Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,736 posts)
31. I doubt very much that any replacement for Clinton will be needed.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:53 PM
Jan 2016

As for my faith in the Democratic Party being fair and honorable, I have a good deal of faith in that. I've been involved in Democratic electoral politics for a very long time. The nomination for President is carried out in a very fair way. It all depends on how people vote in caucuses and primaries and is very well designed.

Some people object to superdelegates, but even that is done to assure a fair outcome at the convention. Those delegates can choose for whom to vote at the convention. All of the rest are based on the votes at caucuses and conventions, and make up about 85% of the total delegate count.

What will decide who the nominee is will be the voting in all 50 states, and nothing else. It will be obvious where things are going following the March 1 caucuses and primaries and will be more and more apparent as additional primaries are held. As each state votes, the distribution of delegates will be transparent and obvious. Anyone will be able to watch and see the count and do their own calculations.

At some point before the convention date, the nominee will be known when the delegate count for that candidate exceeds the majority required to get the nomination. It's unlikely to be anything near a tie, actually, and the superdelegates won't be the deciding vote in 2016.

Right now, everyone's focused on the first two states to hold caucuses or primary elections. They will probably be closely divided, and delegates will be assigned based on the proportions of voters. And so on, throughout the primary season. We are not going to know who the nominee will be following them. It will be nearly tied.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Really? Renew Deal Jan 2016 #1
What I've learned is that a lot of people don't actually understand that. MineralMan Jan 2016 #4
I agree, MM. Nitram Jan 2016 #27
Greenpapers is a good source on delegates and conventions Gothmog Jan 2016 #2
Yes, but the first few states can be game changers. merrily Jan 2016 #3
Yep, when the Big Mo is a-rollin', people are going to want to join the winning team snoringvoter Jan 2016 #6
They can, but are not necessarily so. MineralMan Jan 2016 #7
We agree. They can. merrily Jan 2016 #10
Yes, OK. MineralMan Jan 2016 #12
Lol. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #5
Well, of course, but in close primary races, MineralMan Jan 2016 #9
You mentioned momentum when I didn't. Where I'm from, that's a strawman. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #16
You post as you think best. I do the same. MineralMan Jan 2016 #25
Also Krytan11c Jan 2016 #8
Thank you for stating the obvious and agreeing with me. MineralMan Jan 2016 #11
I know you are trying to help. Krytan11c Jan 2016 #13
DU has many members who read but do not post. MineralMan Jan 2016 #14
Krytan, I know you're trying to be cleverly snarky. Nitram Jan 2016 #28
And if the delegates defy the will of the voters TM99 Jan 2016 #15
They won't defy the will of the voters. MineralMan Jan 2016 #18
I know the process. TM99 Jan 2016 #30
I doubt very much that any replacement for Clinton will be needed. MineralMan Jan 2016 #31
K&R! stonecutter357 Jan 2016 #17
Thanks. I try to explain the system as best I can. MineralMan Jan 2016 #20
good luck. stonecutter357 Jan 2016 #21
K&R. lunamagica Jan 2016 #19
Thank you. MineralMan Jan 2016 #23
Super Tuesday will determine much of the races for both the parties underpants Jan 2016 #22
Yes, and March 1 is not much more than a month away. MineralMan Jan 2016 #24
The press is focused on Iowa because they are lazy. underpants Jan 2016 #26
Well, the real reason they're focused on Iowa is MineralMan Jan 2016 #29
Of course... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Delegate Count from A...»Reply #31