2016 Postmortem

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)

67. My pleasure !

Reply to RiverLover (Reply #60)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:32 AM

Jan 2016

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

119 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary supporters, doesn't it feel a little sleazy [View all] Kentonio Jan 2016 OP

Let me predict the answers. You are manipulating and distorting cali Jan 2016 #1

Hillary is a member of the 1%er club mgcgulfcoast Jan 2016 #2

true happynewyear Jan 2016 #3

And most have no integrity Lawud Jan 2016 #36

Hillary is just sleazy. Period. (nt) bigwillq Jan 2016 #4

Agreed. nt SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #50

bet you get crickets Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #30

This message was self-deleted by its author InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #31

Is there another prominent New Hampshire or Iowa newspaper endorsement out to be revealed?/nt DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #6

Does this mean you choose not to answer my question? Kentonio Jan 2016 #7

I noticed... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #15

Have a nice day. Kentonio Jan 2016 #40

You too, compadre./nt DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #41

Did you miss the report on their success in picking candidates...Zero. libdem4life Jan 2016 #49

LOL!! RiverLover Jan 2016 #60

My pleasure ! libdem4life Jan 2016 #67

Adding this to my trash threads list. eom BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #8

Because it's too uncomfortable to answer? Kentonio Jan 2016 #9

No. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #11

It seems like a pretty clear and straightforward sequence of events. Kentonio Jan 2016 #12

Not .... MrWendel Jan 2016 #10

Please explain why. Kentonio Jan 2016 #13

They would have to feel shame first. That ain't happening. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #14

. GoneFishin Jan 2016 #17

Hehe. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #52

..+1 840high Jan 2016 #119

Should we expect anything different Segami Jan 2016 #16

Simple FBaggins Jan 2016 #18

Can you please supply a link backing this up dsc Jan 2016 #19

Blue Nation RiverLover Jan 2016 #21

that shows Brock bought a media outlet dsc Jan 2016 #23

of course we do know Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #32

"None so blind... Android3.14 Jan 2016 #115

Not sure whether she gave money, but she does coordinate with it. morningfog Jan 2016 #116

According to OpenSecrets Hillary for America 2016 is the biggest contributor to Correct the Record. Kentonio Jan 2016 #118

Much like the US Chamber of Commerce buying up small newspapers in what the Chamber Dustlawyer Jan 2016 #69

This message was self-deleted by its author Recursion Jan 2016 #73

Sure, that's a completely reasonable request. Kentonio Jan 2016 #22

again he bought a media outlet dsc Jan 2016 #25

That was the very first thing in my post. Kentonio Jan 2016 #27

fair enough dsc Jan 2016 #29

does it make it right and moral? Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #34

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #72

Doesn't it make Sanders supports feel a little sleazy baldguy Jan 2016 #20

That is flat out false. Yes, it happens but most of the case against Hillary cali Jan 2016 #24

Please explain how a clearly laid out and provable sequence of events constitues a RW talking point? Kentonio Jan 2016 #26

I'll lay it out for you. In the world exists two states of being: PH and RW. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #58

The fact that she is one of the conservatives who've come into the party in order to turn it RiverLover Jan 2016 #28

And it doesn't bother you in the lease that this view of Clinton baldguy Jan 2016 #45

So, why the reason for the curent RW hatred...white hot, it seems? libdem4life Jan 2016 #51

My view of her isn't that caricature, so no. /nt RiverLover Jan 2016 #59

Yes, it is. baldguy Jan 2016 #71

No it isn't. If you can't see that she and her husband BY THEIR OWN ACTIONS are corrupt RiverLover Jan 2016 #75

The whole purpose of RW propaganda is to mislead people into believing it. baldguy Jan 2016 #80

Er, just that one example is fact. We all know she rigged up her own server while she served in our RiverLover Jan 2016 #82

"...she rigged up her own server ..." And now we have Darrel Issa's grand conspiracy theory, too. baldguy Jan 2016 #112

Thanks for acting like we didn't participate in... intersectionality Jan 2016 #62

Seems Obama was able to beat her w/o resorting to stealing all of Scaiffe's material. baldguy Jan 2016 #70

Who supported two third wayers to choose from in 2007: Clinton and Obama? Was it G S? DhhD Jan 2016 #88

You moved the goal post... intersectionality Jan 2016 #91

Like McCaskill and Shaheen implying that Bernie is a commie? GeorgeGist Jan 2016 #64

Thats funny....you just used a right wing talking point tactic INdemo Jan 2016 #94

Doesn't it make Sanders supports feel a little sleazy Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #99

why? Should Hillary feel sleazy that some members of the 99% support her? nt mhatrw Jan 2016 #110

This is in response to the OP. Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #111

Hillary supporter here. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #33

Hey if you feel positive and optimistic about politicians buying media coverage without transparency Kentonio Jan 2016 #35

I don't plan on luck. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #38

'Luck' is purchased in that world. RiverLover Jan 2016 #68

It would seem just as sleazy as the super pacs which are running ads Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #37

Please identify said SuperPACS AND ads with links. Divernan Jan 2016 #54

I have not seen any super pac ads run against Sanders either. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #56

So couldn't find any to back up your post, huh? (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #100

Business as usual for a Clinton. 99Forever Jan 2016 #39

The bad guys rarely see themselves as the bad guys Android3.14 Jan 2016 #42

I completely agree. Kentonio Jan 2016 #46

If Wall Street can buy themselves a candidate, why not the election? raindaddy Jan 2016 #43

Agreed. See my reply # 88. Goldman Sachs will be running a candidate against someone DhhD Jan 2016 #90

Buying twitter followers is also a desperate move... tecelote Jan 2016 #44

How come no one is talking... MondoCane Jan 2016 #47

... Duppers Jan 2016 #53

One Hillary supporter today has described his apology for that as showing 'moral courage' Kentonio Jan 2016 #55

Did he turn over all the profits he made from the book, to his victim, as a result of real courage? DhhD Jan 2016 #98

Hmm, let me think... Kentonio Jan 2016 #106

We talked about it in the last couple of days, if you scroll through the threads. RiverLover Jan 2016 #63

He is the definition of sleaze. nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #74

This message was self-deleted by its author brooklynite Jan 2016 #48

Probably not Old Codger Jan 2016 #57

Disgusting jehop61 Jan 2016 #61

How is that disgusting? Kentonio Jan 2016 #66

Why would they feel sleezy? humbled_opinion Jan 2016 #65

This message was self-deleted by its author Recursion Jan 2016 #76

No. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #77

Sounds illegal. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #78

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #79

Not uncomfortable or sleezy Sheepshank Jan 2016 #81

'sleAzy'. nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #84

Oooops, clever catch.......I don't care. Sheepshank Jan 2016 #89

No quickesst Jan 2016 #83

You have to keep in mind HassleCat Jan 2016 #85

My advice Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #86

Nothing is sleazier than defending the man who called Anita Hill "slutty" and "nutty." CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #87

Exactly. polly7 Jan 2016 #93

It's disingenuous to even pretend any "apology" could cover that kind of sleaze. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #95

You're absolutely right. What he did was disgusting, soul-destroying and unforgivable. nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #96

Any amount of filth and corruption is good - win at all costs. in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #92

President Obama used a super pac in 2012 Gothmog Jan 2016 #97

Yeah I didnt understand that "campaign donated to SuperPac" no, they dont randys1 Jan 2016 #101

As I showed in the op, Hillary's campaign is the single biggest donor to Correct the Record. Kentonio Jan 2016 #104

You should actually read posts before you reply. Kentonio Jan 2016 #103

What's with the guilt tripping and shaming of fellow DUers over something so inconsequential? LonePirate Jan 2016 #102

This is not inconsequential, and I'm frankly flabbergasted that you'd think it was. Kentonio Jan 2016 #105

I'm more flabbergasted you're essentially attacking other DUers for legal actions by their candidate LonePirate Jan 2016 #107

The only DUers I'm going to lash out at, are those who think this kind of thing is ok Kentonio Jan 2016 #109

No. It's foolish to battle behemoths with limited funds. (eom) oasis Jan 2016 #108

Sanders' supporters, doesn't it feel a little sleazy to be assassinating Hillary's character Beacool Jan 2016 #113

I laid out in the op a clear chain of evidence showing Hillary doing something distasteful. Kentonio Jan 2016 #114

She has handed us the ammo. nt artislife Jan 2016 #117