Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,210 posts)
38. I'm sure that's true.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 01:04 PM
Jan 2016

News reading is an art. To get the actual news, a person has to be very discriminating and try to avoid opinion-based writings, whatever the source. People are forever posting some editorial opinion piece from, say, the New York Times, and attributing that opinion to the newspaper itself. That's deceptive. Others believe that the only real news comes from websites like commondreams.com or somewhere with a strong bias to the left.

The reality is that real news is simply a recounting of facts without comment. If someone says something, the quotation is news. Anything else is commentary on what was said. Most of what we think of as news today is not news at all, but commentary from a particular point of view.

I don't read opinions about politics. I read news. I read what people running for office actually say and think about those people based on history. I form my own opinions. It's not easy to avoid seeing opinion as news. There's so little actual news reporting out there that is uncolored by opinion. So, I read selectively and fish out the actual factual material and ignore the rest.

Then, and only then, I form my opinion. I use multiple sources, always paying attention to whatever bias that source may have. I do not read right-wing sources. I do not read left-wing sources. I read neither without a constant awareness that there is bias there. I treat all news sources as biased and read for the facts.

I don't necessarily think that others have any more valid opinions than I do. I think. I ponder. I review. But, I do form opinions. Sometimes I share those opinions, knowing that others may disagree with the conclusions I've drawn. I don't pretend to be a news source. I'm not a news source.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bernie Sanders Biggest Fans? [View all] MineralMan Jan 2016 OP
I don't recognize this p!ace anymore mcar Jan 2016 #1
There are good arguments to be made for and against MineralMan Jan 2016 #4
Enough indeed! mcar Jan 2016 #8
"Hillary is too stupid to be President" -Mineral Man v2.0.08 Fumesucker Jan 2016 #2
MM must have gotten that from left-wing media. elias49 Jan 2016 #6
You know the context of that. MineralMan Jan 2016 #7
Please provide context for this peculiar remark. Hortensis Jan 2016 #13
I will provide the context. MineralMan Jan 2016 #18
Ignorance can be fixed, stupid is forever Fumesucker Jan 2016 #20
Stupid is forever... Hortensis Jan 2016 #32
problem here karynnj Jan 2016 #31
That was her explanation for staying in. MineralMan Jan 2016 #33
One could argue that it wasn't "stupid" at all, but calculated. DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #45
it works both ways if you stop one side, stop the other hollysmom Jan 2016 #3
I'd be in favor of that. You will not see me quoting right-wing MineralMan Jan 2016 #34
well, we agree, how do we get to the others? hollysmom Jan 2016 #39
I'm not sure that's possible. MineralMan Jan 2016 #40
I see you only complaining about the Sanders supporters. nm rhett o rick Jan 2016 #43
Yes? Today, that was who was posting from MineralMan Jan 2016 #44
Those are hard to find as they are quickly hidden by juries ... NurseJackie Jan 2016 #46
Is or is not the FBI investigating Hillary currently? peacebird Jan 2016 #5
Thank you for reading my post and replying to it. MineralMan Jan 2016 #9
Well, yeah. elias49 Jan 2016 #11
You seem upset. You should discuss this with the Hillary supporters who post much worse crap berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #10
Why should I do that? MineralMan Jan 2016 #12
So it's ok to call out one side on their sources but not another? berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #14
I post what I see and want to comment on. MineralMan Jan 2016 #15
So will I. And so you can stop whining about it... berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #16
Whining? No. I will comment on threads posted on DU. MineralMan Jan 2016 #19
Your OP wreaks of whining because you don't like the source of posts berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #21
No whining here. MineralMan Jan 2016 #22
Deny it all you want. Doesn't change the fact you did. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #23
Oh, I won't be deleting my OP. MineralMan Jan 2016 #24
Whoever said it was authoritative. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #27
You have the last word in this subthread. MineralMan Jan 2016 #28
Yes. Please consider the source... Autumn Jan 2016 #17
+1 Segami Jan 2016 #25
. Autumn Jan 2016 #30
[The nominee] will be decided by Democrats voting in their caucuses and primaries... not quite MM aikoaiko Jan 2016 #26
When people vote in Democratic primaries and caucuses, MineralMan Jan 2016 #29
IF Sanders loses the nomination it proves only one thing tularetom Jan 2016 #35
I disagree on both counts. MineralMan Jan 2016 #36
Some of us consider many "mainstream" corporate sources as conservative mouthpieces Armstead Jan 2016 #37
I'm sure that's true. MineralMan Jan 2016 #38
The GOP and the right wing media are trying to help Sanders Gothmog Jan 2016 #41
Why should the RW have to attack Bernie? The Clintonites are doing it for them, and so well... from jillan Jan 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders Biggest Fa...»Reply #38