2016 Postmortem

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)

97. Looked to me like the young man was a Sanders supporter...

Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:08 AM

Jan 2016

...hence the initial slip when he started to say "Secretary Sanders" then corrected himself. Also it implies he may have rehearsed his question as going to Senator Sanders. Then when he says "I can see why they gave you this question" that would tend to imply that those running the town hall decided that his question should go to Secretary Clinton instead.

That's my take. If that's what happened then it would be interesting to know how many questions were redirected to other candidates?

And yes I admit I could be wrong. That's just how it struck me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

114 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Last Question for Clinton: "I can see why they gave you this question" [View all] berni_mccoy Jan 2016 OP

You heard it right... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #1

clip tomm2thumbs Jan 2016 #55

I caught that too DVRacer Jan 2016 #2

+1 MissDeeds Jan 2016 #9

Its a conspiracy I tell you! hrmjustin Jan 2016 #3

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but what is the alternative explanation? n/t ram2008 Jan 2016 #15

Her husband was a former president as was her boss. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #18

Why did he say "I can see why they gave you this question" ram2008 Jan 2016 #20

You do understand they picked the questions and those who asked them? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #28

Do you understand that the questions were supposed to be from the audience? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #93

He submitted the question "for any candidate". One candidate would get the question. CNN decided. nt ieoeja Jan 2016 #114

But why would he say, "I can see why THEY GAVE YOU this question." JDPriestly Jan 2016 #62

Probably when they selected the people who would get to ask their questions, they also decided tblue37 Jan 2016 #79

The evening was set up to favor Hillary. But for me, she talked too much about herself and JDPriestly Jan 2016 #81

So, you make more crap up to contribute to this conspiray OP. Shame on you. riversedge Jan 2016 #85

In teaching older students for 40 years, this young man seems to have come in to - listen and DhhD Jan 2016 #111

He also called her Secretary Sanders... Agschmid Jan 2016 #4

Yeah, that's some real out there stuff thinking that they might load some questions for her. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #13

Maybe it was a Sanders supporter..... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #27

- draa Jan 2016 #32

I kept wondering if there would be a bulge under her jacket if she turned around... cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #5

I know, right? n/t FourScore Jan 2016 #16

Wow.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #21

Woah...slow down... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #24

Oh....good.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #30

Honestly... TCJ70 Jan 2016 #31

Ace Ventura. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #35

I just really remember W's cod piece..... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #41

No, that's not how you leapt there. merrily Jan 2016 #108

Maybe at the next Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2016 #110

And that is a totally nasty smear. murielm99 Jan 2016 #47

HA HA HA HA HA! "He gives the same speech over and over." Yes, he does. Whereas Hillary Clinton Gene Debs Jan 2016 #65

She has detailed plans. murielm99 Jan 2016 #66

and her details change too. As far as Sanders' plans�None are so blind as those Gene Debs Jan 2016 #67

As are Hillary's murielm99 Jan 2016 #70

Not only does Sanders give the same answers but he avoids the question asked politicaljunkie41910 Jan 2016 #76

Correct. murielm99 Jan 2016 #83

Calling someone sexist ridiculously is not a nasty smear? merrily Jan 2016 #105

DUzy... Agschmid Jan 2016 #39

Why, is Bill's now missing? LOL John Poet Jan 2016 #68

As if continuous accusations of sexism aren't nasty? merrily Jan 2016 #103

Really? W is a moron, whereas HRC is a brilliant woman with great command of the language. tblue37 Jan 2016 #80

Oh, she's definitely a gifted orator. VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #101

Being the DNC's chosen automatically gets you support from some. Oratory or not. merrily Jan 2016 #107

I heard it. Jaw dropping that we got to hear it. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #6

Who Gave Who The Question?..... global1 Jan 2016 #7

very well could be Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #10

I read that post. Most 840high Jan 2016 #69

I saw that too Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #8

He was called to ask the question he submitted. joshcryer Jan 2016 #11

Too late. Agschmid Jan 2016 #42

are you serious? nt retrowire Jan 2016 #63

Yes, that's how they almost always take questions. joshcryer Jan 2016 #64

the guy said retrowire Jan 2016 #71

He was referring to his question. joshcryer Jan 2016 #74

yes my wife found this out last night retrowire Jan 2016 #112

Why they gave YOU this (my) question whatthehey Jan 2016 #106

I noticed that as well oberliner Jan 2016 #12

I don't understand what happened there Renew Deal Jan 2016 #14

That question certainly raised questions. Broward Jan 2016 #17

I think it answered a few as well. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #19

+1 OrwellwasRight Jan 2016 #23

Lol, well done. draa Jan 2016 #36

Wow! I hope the media caught that CoffeeCat Jan 2016 #22

Obviously all the questions were pre-selected. Each questioner was introduced by name ecstatic Jan 2016 #25

Yep. That's how I look at it too. n/t Contrary1 Jan 2016 #77

Caught that as well. Sadly, we knew there would be plants and softballs for HRC. Jackilope Jan 2016 #26

Cause your brother said you were really a great athelete.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #33

That was a trap. This was canned. There's a difference berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #37

Yeah....cause the question about her being called dishonest.... FrenchieCat Jan 2016 #49

If she knew they were coming they were. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #51

That was a set up to talk about his age. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #94

What did the moderator say at the beginning? toshiba783 Jan 2016 #29

The person acted as if it was not his question. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #34

The person also adressed her as Senator Sanders... toshiba783 Jan 2016 #52

Yes, the questionners were introduced by name and school. --FOR ALL 3 CANDIIDATES. NO riversedge Jan 2016 #40

There is a story somewhere on DU, I read it earlier today about a girl being onecaliberal Jan 2016 #38

all 3 CANDIDATES QUESTIONS FOR AUDIANCE WERE INTRODUCED BY NAME AND SCHOOL riversedge Jan 2016 #43

I actually missed the opening. Rilgin Jan 2016 #48

I think the question we should be asking is... draa Jan 2016 #44

My guess? Chris Cuomo. Townhalls are a frickin farce these days -- it is all just optics. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #82

I caught this as well Rilgin Jan 2016 #45

Does anyone think... quickesst Jan 2016 #46

Could be... MrMickeysMom Jan 2016 #50

Maybe he meant the question to be for Bernie not Hillary and they had him switch oberliner Jan 2016 #53

Why would they have him switch? Maybe my clock is wrong but one thing I noticed on that last Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #56

CNN's post show discussion played Hillary up & ended with her. senz Jan 2016 #57

yeah the post show was all about Hillary. retrowire Jan 2016 #72

What do you think he meant by his remark? oberliner Jan 2016 #88

On the face of it this sounds like someone other than him selected the question, although Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #95

That might be. On the other hand one could say her answer was well prepared Matariki Jan 2016 #61

One other thing I noticed. Rilgin Jan 2016 #54

Good point. Very observant. senz Jan 2016 #58

OMGGGGOO>>>>>>>>>>>Another fricking Make up piece of crap by a Sanders fan that is bound to riversedge Jan 2016 #87

so busted Matariki Jan 2016 #59

I can understand why CNN would have varied questions lovemydog Jan 2016 #60

Damn,...nothing on but reruns. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #73

K & R AzDar Jan 2016 #75

Another stupid conspiracy theory debunked. Anyone think people will ever wise up? Hoyt Jan 2016 #78

Chuckle. 53 RECs. Sad for DU riversedge Jan 2016 #84

+1, LOL n/t FSogol Jan 2016 #86

Right, so they decided to have that question go to HRC oberliner Jan 2016 #89

They did not "write the question for him." That's implication. Clinton had a 1 out of 3 chance to Hoyt Jan 2016 #102

Agreed oberliner Jan 2016 #113

Who said it was a conspiracy? I stand by my observation. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #91

I predict a dozen more OPs about this mcar Jan 2016 #98

That does not debunk it. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #100

it's such a dumb fucking question-- no real person cares about that shit Fast Walker 52 Jan 2016 #90

Agreed. berni_mccoy Jan 2016 #92

Yep. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #104

Seems glaringly obvious. 99Forever Jan 2016 #96

Looked to me like the young man was a Sanders supporter... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #97

At least it wasn't "Boxers or Briefs?". Buns_of_Fire Jan 2016 #99

I loved her answer CajunBlazer Jan 2016 #109