Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
30. One of the mental blocks on this website is black/white thinking
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:47 AM
Jan 2016
Black and White Thinking doesn't Work in a Gray World

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/byron-williams/black-and-white-thinking-_b_30747.html

To see the world in black and white is to live within the contours of extremism. This outlook neatly divides the world into right versus wrong, good versus evil, and yes versus no. This thinking is dependent upon such words as always and never. Especially in times of crisis, the black and white worldview is looked upon as strength and courage to the casual observer...Though appearing to be the best choice in the short term, black and white thinking can bring about long-term negative consequences.

The problem with black and white thinking is that it usually does battle in a world that is nuanced and gray.

Cognitive analysis begins in black and white terms, this is how children learn to use words and organize their thoughts. How many parents have provided their seven-year-old with a rule, only to later alter the decree ever so slightly and have the child retort with: "But you said?" In the world of Developmental Psychology this is called primitive thinking. As adults, we are prone to primitive thinking during moments of crisis and stress. Mark Sichel, author and psychotherapist, writes, "When the adult starts relying on the words "always" or "never," and seeing the world in black and white terms, they are slipping back to the way they saw the world as a child."

In the world of black and white we can become overwhelmed with the desire to find "the" answer. This is why church attendance grew across the country immediately following 9/11--folks looking for an answer, trying to understand the "why" question...For all of the obvious short- term reasons to embrace black and white thinking, there is definite a downside. Not only does black and white thinking show little appreciation for the world of gray it has even less for the concept of self-reflection. To self-reflect, especially after a decision has been made, could open one to the possibility of being wrong--which defeats the purpose of black and white thinking. Many psychologists maintain that black and white thinking actually exasperates mental health issues like depression and anxiety.

Black and white thinking is also flawed because it inherently assumes a static world. It is dependent upon everything and everyone maintaining the role that such thinking has already preordained...Failure becomes harder to confront because one tends to place an inordinate amount of energy being right. It is an unfortunate default against the complexities of the world.

Our political leadership has been at its best when those leaders have dared to enter into the world of gray. Imagine how America would be different had Washington, Lincoln, or Roosevelt maintained black and white thinking throughout their respective wars. Their greatness today is not measured simply by the end result but also by their ability to adapt in lieu of unsuspected challenges--some by their own making.

It requires far less courage to live in the black and white than it does to live in the gray. The world of gray requires that we show up and be present. It does not afford us the luxury of putting life on automatic pilot. Moreover, black and white thinking, though it may provide momentary comfort, is simply unrealistic to sustain. After all, even black and white photos come with their own varying shades of gray.
Ed Rogers, an opinion writer for the Washington Post, offering commentary from a conservative still_one Jan 2016 #1
Shocked and outraged, eh??? catnhatnh Jan 2016 #43
Anyone who uses opinions from the Lee Atwater school, speaks volumes. Just a few days ago I saw still_one Jan 2016 #46
Maestro, if you please: Proserpina Jan 2016 #2
Why are you applauding for a Rethug writer who worked for Reagan and Bush? n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #14
I'm merely acknowledging the obvious Proserpina Jan 2016 #15
Bernie's campaign just asked his supporters to treat Hillary with respect, pnwmom Jan 2016 #17
Truth is not hate. I'm really sorry if you can't handle truth with dignity and grace, Proserpina Jan 2016 #19
The article is full of mudslinging and lies. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #22
We will know in 6 weeks or so Proserpina Jan 2016 #23
The election won't prove anything about this article. It's full of Rethug mudslinging, pnwmom Jan 2016 #24
I personally wouldn't waste my breath. Ironically they think this kind of garbage helps their still_one Jan 2016 #47
A more effective argumentation technique would be to point out and refute the lies Fumesucker Jan 2016 #35
why don't we just cut out the middleman bigtree Jan 2016 #36
Along with Stormfront too, yes? Fumesucker Jan 2016 #51
Please stop making up stuff about Senator Sanders. You're embarrassing yourself. merrily Jan 2016 #27
This writer who was mentored by Lee Atwater. Really pathetic still_one Jan 2016 #37
not just mentored, he was Lee Atwater's senior deputy bigtree Jan 2016 #39
Yup, as bad as it gets still_one Jan 2016 #41
HILLARYOUS! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #34
isn't that Bush's crony? bigtree Jan 2016 #3
The one and the same. riversedge Jan 2016 #5
the post is highlighted on the front page bigtree Jan 2016 #6
And this happens immediately after Sanders' spokesperson asks supporters pnwmom Jan 2016 #11
it's their raison d'être bigtree Jan 2016 #12
Truth hurts, sometimes. And sometimes, even the GOP has a portion of the truth Proserpina Jan 2016 #16
It's just Rethug PR, eagerly lapped up by some Bernie supporters. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #18
did you know Rogers was the senior deputy to the master of wedge politics, Lee Atwater? bigtree Jan 2016 #38
reality bigtree Jan 2016 #20
It takes an amazing amount of willful blindness to insist that this man's observations Proserpina Jan 2016 #21
it takes even more gall to bring this right-wing tripe here bigtree Jan 2016 #25
Seems you can't resist trying to make Sanders your assistant poster. merrily Jan 2016 #28
I wish I could say I was surprised at yet another right-wing source posted in order to bash HRC. DanTex Jan 2016 #4
Why not? We get a lot of right wing spin against Sanders...From Democrats Armstead Jan 2016 #42
Ed Rogers is a prominent RETHUG. Why not post Trump's opinion of Hillary's pnwmom Jan 2016 #7
I love the way supporters are still reccing the tripe bigtree Jan 2016 #8
Not one of them is smart enough to read to the bottom of the article pnwmom Jan 2016 #9
the content should have clued them in bigtree Jan 2016 #10
Lol! zappaman Jan 2016 #13
But its ok when right wing commentators trash Bernie Sanders you are the first to congradulate them INdemo Jan 2016 #26
She should have hired a saltpoint Jan 2016 #29
One of the mental blocks on this website is black/white thinking Proserpina Jan 2016 #30
Black and white thinkers are always fighting the previous battle. FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #50
Ed Rogers. LOL... SidDithers Jan 2016 #31
Why do posters attribute an editorial to the paper it's written in and not the person who wrote it? DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #32
The WaPo paid for it, did they not? Proserpina Jan 2016 #33
It is the opinion of Ed Rogers and not the Washington Post. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #40
The entire group protesting this op-ed catnhatnh Jan 2016 #44
Oh my. Ed Rogers In_The_Wind Jan 2016 #45
Washington Post is busy attacking our candidates--HRC "sinking" and Bernie's plans full of fiction" book_worm Jan 2016 #48
Lordy... one_voice Jan 2016 #49
I doubt it. She wins Iowa and for me, she's probably won the nomination LittleBlue Jan 2016 #52
Lies and propaganda workinclasszero Jan 2016 #53
For the life of me, I can't see what's untrue about this summation... libdem4life Jan 2016 #54
Obamacare is a "calamity" according to the same Republican source saynotoplutocrats Jan 2016 #55
The fact that you tried to piggy-back on WP's reputation, and disguise the fact that DanTex Jan 2016 #56
Note that I made NO COMMENTS pro or con about this article Lorien Jan 2016 #57
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WaPo: Hillary Clinton’s d...»Reply #30