Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
30. I missed this. Took a break from mopping..
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:21 PM
Jan 2016

the floors. Good read for the break!

Thanks for posting.

K&R

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree. Beyond the infomercial provided by CNN. 3-5% support in MD. Skwmom Jan 2016 #1
Republicans are not anti big government, government spending goes up under Republicans Fumesucker Jan 2016 #2
Right, they just talk a good game. elleng Jan 2016 #3
So the analysis in the article is flawed from the get go Fumesucker Jan 2016 #4
What EXACTLY about the article's ANALYSIS would affect what the author says, elleng Jan 2016 #5
The author thinks Republicans are for smaller government Fumesucker Jan 2016 #6
Has NOTHING to do with the factual discussion of O'Malley's accomplishments and plans, elleng Jan 2016 #7
Explain how such an educated woman can make such a basic mistake then Fumesucker Jan 2016 #8
She said that republicans "worry" about big govt, she didn't say they were anti-big govt. FSogol Jan 2016 #10
They don't worry about big government, if they did we wouldn't have DHS, ICE and the Iraq War Fumesucker Jan 2016 #12
They "claim" to care about big govt. They don't do anything to prevent big govt. FSogol Jan 2016 #14
As you pointed out the person said the Republican "worry" about big government Fumesucker Jan 2016 #16
I understood what the writer meant. Good luck with your hair splitting today! FSogol Jan 2016 #17
Just ask the people of Flint Michigan who have had to deal with a republican who Peacetrain Jan 2016 #18
I just wanted to say that I wasn't trying to hurt O'Malley here Fumesucker Jan 2016 #9
K & R. n/t FSogol Jan 2016 #11
great article! bigtree Jan 2016 #13
+1 n/t FSogol Jan 2016 #15
Excellent article!! thank you! Peacetrain Jan 2016 #19
Unfortunately, Sanders supporters immediately jumped on board using him as "anti-Hiillary" KittyWampus Jan 2016 #20
You have to admit that the Drake Mock caucus was encouraging. FSogol Jan 2016 #22
Sure was! elleng Jan 2016 #23
You do realize that DU has rules regarding copyrights? n/t demmiblue Jan 2016 #21
I think its too late for MOM this go around. aikoaiko Jan 2016 #24
No one's voted yet anywhere, elleng Jan 2016 #25
Sure, I agree that polls today are not what they will be in the future. aikoaiko Jan 2016 #32
and of course there is NO 'national democratic primary,' elleng Jan 2016 #33
It is my humble opinion DaGimpster Jan 2016 #26
I have, and he is number 2 on my list of primary candidates. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #27
Ok. I've taken a serious look. FBaggins Jan 2016 #28
Right now he's my second choice. Hell Hath No Fury Jan 2016 #29
I missed this. Took a break from mopping.. one_voice Jan 2016 #30
VERY good 'break' read! elleng Jan 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It’s time to take a serio...»Reply #30