Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,174 posts)
30. Priorities USA is saving most of its funds for the general, according to this article.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 08:05 AM
Jan 2016

The OP is about SPENT funds, not saved funds.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Candidates are not in control of super pacs, as you know. Vinca Jan 2016 #1
Now you're saying Bernie can't do stuff? I thought you guys are the ones stevenleser Jan 2016 #2
What does Hillary bring to the table madokie Jan 2016 #9
No moving the goalposts. Respond to my point. Nt stevenleser Jan 2016 #11
What is your point, exactly? Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #13
Anti-Sanders attack ad isn’t quite what it seems to be Gothmog Jan 2016 #49
This is a non issue. We all agree (or should) that super PACs shouldn't exist. Bubzer Jan 2016 #89
Super pacs aren't supposed to be in direct communication with the candidates. A Simple Game Jan 2016 #33
Lamest straw man ever. morningfog Jan 2016 #44
it's like dealing w/Freepers, isn't it? Roland99 Jan 2016 #91
hmmmm Perogie Jan 2016 #68
Now you're saying Bernie can't do stuff? AlbertCat Jan 2016 #83
re: "Which is it? Either the guy can do magic and accomplish everything he wants or he can't." thesquanderer Jan 2016 #85
oh good grief Roland99 Jan 2016 #88
Is this what you'd be saying if Hillary had had the most spent on her? pnwmom Jan 2016 #3
I'd vote for Hillary if nurses supported her with a super pac. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #40
One candidate does control her PAC: Hillary. morningfog Jan 2016 #37
You should present your evidence directly to the FEC. JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #84
Her campaign relies on a "loophole" in the law. morningfog Jan 2016 #90
Mr. Brock Lage Nom Ai Jan 2016 #98
Somehow spending $600,000 in attack ads against Bernie is helping him, but when they Dustlawyer Jan 2016 #64
What a brain-dead attack. John Poet Jan 2016 #71
Except when I read a post about how David Brock is.... JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #80
I think their analysis is grossly misleading and wrong Jarqui Jan 2016 #4
Yeah, I'm having difficulty believing a nurses' union has outspent Corrupt the Record. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #5
Corrupt the Record spent $333,000 Jarqui Jan 2016 #7
Priorities USA is saving money for the General Election campaign. pnwmom Jan 2016 #17
Too bad they will be forced to either 1) return the money or 2) spend it on Bernie. Health Wagon Jan 2016 #114
Why would it be too bad if they spent it on another Democratic nominee? pnwmom Jan 2016 #115
Then they shall spend it for Bernie. Health Wagon Jan 2016 #116
This report is on money SPENT and it is quite possible that they've collected money pnwmom Jan 2016 #8
I am talking about money spent. Jarqui Jan 2016 #20
Do you have links for all that? Maybe you should report it to the FEC. pnwmom Jan 2016 #24
I have posted them before. May not have time to find them all Jarqui Jan 2016 #28
And your big claim that Super-Pacs gave her $15 million pnwmom Jan 2016 #42
All I can do is repost it: Jarqui Jan 2016 #55
"Outside groups" doesn't equal "Super pacs." And Super pacs pnwmom Jan 2016 #61
When opensecrets goes to the trouble of adding Jarqui Jan 2016 #93
No coordinating with SuperPACs, unless you are Hillary morningfog Jan 2016 #41
She isn't. There isn't a bit of truth to the idea that she has SuperPac pnwmom Jan 2016 #43
She coordinates with Brock and correct the record. morningfog Jan 2016 #45
Saved for the General. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #36
Then those SuperPacs can donate their funds to Bernie. pnwmom Jan 2016 #46
Sweet! n/t tazkcmo Jan 2016 #48
Clinton Camp: GOP Attacks On Hillary Show They'd Rather Face Bernie In Fall Gothmog Jan 2016 #52
The GOP would like to see them bash each others brains out and Jarqui Jan 2016 #57
Oh noes!! Karl Rove! frylock Jan 2016 #110
Looks like someone had similar issues with the article Jarqui Jan 2016 #94
This screaming Hey look over there isn't working madokie Jan 2016 #6
Your attempt at distraction from the FEC report fails. As all your attempts pnwmom Jan 2016 #10
That's what you get whenever you raise a point unfavorable to Bernie stevenleser Jan 2016 #12
What does Hillary bring to the table madokie Jan 2016 #25
Again, moving the goalposts instead of addressing the criticism of Bernie. nt stevenleser Jan 2016 #75
I've heard the criticism of Bernie and it's been proven to be bunk madokie Jan 2016 #95
It's easier to hide the question. NurseJackie Jan 2016 #26
It’s fucking tiresome dorkzilla Jan 2016 #63
You know the thing is madokie Jan 2016 #73
I knew it! Those goddamn nurses have created Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #14
What is worse about Super-pacs funded by the League of Conservation Voters pnwmom Jan 2016 #19
Those fucking nurses are going to be the end of Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #29
Priorities USA is saving most of its funds for the general, according to this article. pnwmom Jan 2016 #30
I'm sure you think that is an argument of some sort. Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #31
Me, too Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #32
For that matter Plucketeer Jan 2016 #100
Typical HRC supporter math--counting Republican superpacs as actual Sanders supporters n/t eridani Jan 2016 #15
You misread the piece. The nurses union has spent more on Bernie pnwmom Jan 2016 #21
Only in a Clinton World tazkcmo Jan 2016 #51
Only in Bernie world is Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation Voters pnwmom Jan 2016 #53
Only in Bernie world is Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation Voters AlbertCat Jan 2016 #92
No, I didn't make it up. That is the term used by the Bernie campaign, pnwmom Jan 2016 #117
There are organizations that bother to poll their members before endorsing, and those that don't eridani Jan 2016 #121
Note to self Uponthegears Jan 2016 #16
What is worse about Super-pacs funded by the League of Conservation Voters pnwmom Jan 2016 #18
Because LCV and PP are part of the "establishment"! Pay attention! DanTex Jan 2016 #23
The short answer Uponthegears Jan 2016 #34
Hillary's spent SuperPac money, according to this report, is mostly from Planned Parenthood pnwmom Jan 2016 #50
Is it even possible Uponthegears Jan 2016 #81
This. navarth Jan 2016 #96
I don't understand where you got that Skidmore Jan 2016 #27
As usual, the facts here aren't going down too well with Bernie fans. DanTex Jan 2016 #22
Good for Bernie! tazkcmo Jan 2016 #35
Cracks in Bernie's shining armor? One day his supporters will realize livetohike Jan 2016 #38
he is a career politician, and one who is learning to play the game. AlbertCat Jan 2016 #97
This is his first national race. The "game" is indeed a game. There are rules and these errors the livetohike Jan 2016 #102
Oh please! AlbertCat Jan 2016 #103
VT is a small state. Can't even accept that fact? livetohike Jan 2016 #105
VT is a small state. AlbertCat Jan 2016 #106
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jan 2016 #39
Republicans Take Their Sanders Advocacy to the Next Level Gothmog Jan 2016 #47
I'm A Pediatric Hospice Nurse Proud to Support Bernie! mucifer Jan 2016 #54
How very Third Way of you hueymahl Jan 2016 #56
The Republicans went after the teachers. SamKnause Jan 2016 #58
Conservatives are always at the root.. frylock Jan 2016 #111
K&R mcar Jan 2016 #59
OK, so it's David Brock versus gordyfl Jan 2016 #60
No, its Nurses vs. Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation Voters. nt pnwmom Jan 2016 #62
That's a sloppy and distorted article Armstead Jan 2016 #65
'New York Times Gets it Wrong: Bernie Sanders Not Top Beneficiary of Outside Money' Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #66
And the real nail in the coffin n2doc Jan 2016 #70
^ This! ^ SoapBox Jan 2016 #72
New disclosures which they’ll under-report dorkzilla Jan 2016 #82
It didn't get it wrong. The article specifically focused on independent funds pnwmom Jan 2016 #76
Correct the Record raising soft money & letting the Clinton campaign control spending is worse. NT Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #78
Shocking! frylock Jan 2016 #112
Awesome! the one person who will work to end Super PAC spending gets the most! fbc Jan 2016 #67
Oh my god, you're right! Not Sure Jan 2016 #69
The nurses are coming! The NURSES are coming! bread_and_roses Jan 2016 #74
The nurses spent the money on him; Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation pnwmom Jan 2016 #113
the excuses ought to be good joeybee12 Jan 2016 #77
Thanks for pointing out his hypocrisy and gimmicks. R B Garr Jan 2016 #79
re: "lift Mr. Sanders, whom conservatives believe will be easier to defeat in a general election" thesquanderer Jan 2016 #86
"be careful what you wish for" AlbertCat Jan 2016 #101
This message was self-deleted by its author Bubzer Jan 2016 #87
It takes very clever parsing of words to make this happen karynnj Jan 2016 #99
The same people recommending this SheenaR Jan 2016 #104
Projection AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #107
Bwahahaha! MoonRiver Jan 2016 #108
Bernie Sanders-the canditate who harps daily against the eveils of Super Pacs Wins. whow!!!!!!!!!!! riversedge Jan 2016 #109
Thank you for this, pnwmom! Cha Jan 2016 #118
Wonderful news!! RobertEarl Jan 2016 #119
Kick & very highly recommended! William769 Jan 2016 #120
Trying to pretend that union money is the same as bankster money is why I cannot support Hillary. w4rma Jan 2016 #122
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie wins the Super-Pac...»Reply #30