Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie wins the Super-Pac spending contest! According to the Federal Election Commission, [View all]Gothmog
(174,257 posts)47. Republicans Take Their Sanders Advocacy to the Next Level
This ad was designed to support Sanders just as McCaskill's ads against Todd Akin were designed to do http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-01-28/republicans-take-their-sanders-advocacy-to-the-next-level
Add Republican operatives to the list of strong Bernie Sanders supporters in the Democratic primary, along with progressive activists and young voters.
A super-PAC founded by Republican billionaire Joe Ricketts is making its first foray into the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, spending $600,000 on a television ad in Iowa calling Sanders "too liberal," according to The New York Times.
The ad then spotlights two of the policies that have helped fuel his rise in the Democratic primaryhis calls for "completely free" college education and more taxes on Wall Street and the "super-rich."
"It's exactly the same thing we did with Todd Akin," said Caitlin Legacki, who served as communications director to Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill's during her successful campaign in 2012. "They're clearly trying to use the exact same playbook."
Four years ago, McCaskill spent nearly $1 million in TV ads calling Akin "too conservative" in an effort to promote him, rather than his two opponents. He won the primary, then McCaskill trounced him on Election Day.
"More than anything that should be a concern for Democrats, because you don't make those kinds of investments in support of a candidate from another party unless you believe there's a good reason for it," Legacki added.
A super-PAC founded by Republican billionaire Joe Ricketts is making its first foray into the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, spending $600,000 on a television ad in Iowa calling Sanders "too liberal," according to The New York Times.
The ad then spotlights two of the policies that have helped fuel his rise in the Democratic primaryhis calls for "completely free" college education and more taxes on Wall Street and the "super-rich."
"It's exactly the same thing we did with Todd Akin," said Caitlin Legacki, who served as communications director to Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill's during her successful campaign in 2012. "They're clearly trying to use the exact same playbook."
Four years ago, McCaskill spent nearly $1 million in TV ads calling Akin "too conservative" in an effort to promote him, rather than his two opponents. He won the primary, then McCaskill trounced him on Election Day.
"More than anything that should be a concern for Democrats, because you don't make those kinds of investments in support of a candidate from another party unless you believe there's a good reason for it," Legacki added.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie wins the Super-Pac spending contest! According to the Federal Election Commission, [View all]
pnwmom
Jan 2016
OP
Super pacs aren't supposed to be in direct communication with the candidates.
A Simple Game
Jan 2016
#33
re: "Which is it? Either the guy can do magic and accomplish everything he wants or he can't."
thesquanderer
Jan 2016
#85
Somehow spending $600,000 in attack ads against Bernie is helping him, but when they
Dustlawyer
Jan 2016
#64
Yeah, I'm having difficulty believing a nurses' union has outspent Corrupt the Record. n/t
winter is coming
Jan 2016
#5
Too bad they will be forced to either 1) return the money or 2) spend it on Bernie.
Health Wagon
Jan 2016
#114
This report is on money SPENT and it is quite possible that they've collected money
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#8
Again, moving the goalposts instead of addressing the criticism of Bernie. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2016
#75
Priorities USA is saving most of its funds for the general, according to this article.
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#30
Typical HRC supporter math--counting Republican superpacs as actual Sanders supporters n/t
eridani
Jan 2016
#15
Only in Bernie world is Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation Voters
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#53
Only in Bernie world is Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation Voters
AlbertCat
Jan 2016
#92
There are organizations that bother to poll their members before endorsing, and those that don't
eridani
Jan 2016
#121
Hillary's spent SuperPac money, according to this report, is mostly from Planned Parenthood
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#50
This is his first national race. The "game" is indeed a game. There are rules and these errors the
livetohike
Jan 2016
#102
'New York Times Gets it Wrong: Bernie Sanders Not Top Beneficiary of Outside Money'
Eric J in MN
Jan 2016
#66
Correct the Record raising soft money & letting the Clinton campaign control spending is worse. NT
Eric J in MN
Jan 2016
#78
The nurses spent the money on him; Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#113
re: "lift Mr. Sanders, whom conservatives believe will be easier to defeat in a general election"
thesquanderer
Jan 2016
#86
Bernie Sanders-the canditate who harps daily against the eveils of Super Pacs Wins. whow!!!!!!!!!!!
riversedge
Jan 2016
#109