Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie wins the Super-Pac spending contest! According to the Federal Election Commission, [View all]Gothmog
(174,200 posts)49. Anti-Sanders attack ad isn’t quite what it seems to be
Here is a great example of the GOP and conservatives supporting Sanders. This so-called attack ad is really an ad designed to help Sanders. The fact that the Sanders supporters think that this is an attack ad and do not realize that the purpose of this ad is to help Sanders is amusing http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/anti-sanders-attack-ad-isnt-quite-what-it-seems-be
Republicans have made no secret of the fact that theyd prefer to run against Bernie Sanders in the general election. Whether or not their assumptions are correct is a separate question, but GOP officials, convinced that the senator would be easy to defeat, have gone out of their way to help Sanders in the Democratic race.....
At first blush, the move may seem encouraging to Sanders supporters. After all, if Republicans have gone from defending Sanders to attacking him, maybe it means GOP insiders are getting scared of the Vermont independent?
Its a nice idea, but thats not whats going on here. In fact, far from an attack ad, this commercial, backed by a prominent Republican mega-donor, is the latest evidence of the GOP trying to help Sanders, not hurt him.
Indeed, in this case, its hardly even subtle. This commercial touts Sanders support for tuition-free college, single-payer health care, and higher taxes on the super-rich. It concludes that the senator is too liberal, which isnt much of an insult in an ad directed towards liberal voters in Iowa.
In other words, were talking about a Republican mega-donor investing in a faux attack ad to help Sanders win because he sees Sanders as easy to beat in November.
Its the mirror image of the tactic Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) used in the 2012 U.S. Senate race in Missouri, when she invested in ads intended to boost then-Rep. Todd Akin (R) in his primary race, with commercials touting his far-right positions and calling him too conservative. The point was to make Akin look better in the eyes of Missouri Republicans so hed win the primary, making it easier for the incumbent Democrat to defeat him on Election Day.
At first blush, the move may seem encouraging to Sanders supporters. After all, if Republicans have gone from defending Sanders to attacking him, maybe it means GOP insiders are getting scared of the Vermont independent?
Its a nice idea, but thats not whats going on here. In fact, far from an attack ad, this commercial, backed by a prominent Republican mega-donor, is the latest evidence of the GOP trying to help Sanders, not hurt him.
Indeed, in this case, its hardly even subtle. This commercial touts Sanders support for tuition-free college, single-payer health care, and higher taxes on the super-rich. It concludes that the senator is too liberal, which isnt much of an insult in an ad directed towards liberal voters in Iowa.
In other words, were talking about a Republican mega-donor investing in a faux attack ad to help Sanders win because he sees Sanders as easy to beat in November.
Its the mirror image of the tactic Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) used in the 2012 U.S. Senate race in Missouri, when she invested in ads intended to boost then-Rep. Todd Akin (R) in his primary race, with commercials touting his far-right positions and calling him too conservative. The point was to make Akin look better in the eyes of Missouri Republicans so hed win the primary, making it easier for the incumbent Democrat to defeat him on Election Day.
This ad is just another example of the GOP trying to help Sanders become the nominee because the GOP knows that Sanders is the weaker candidate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie wins the Super-Pac spending contest! According to the Federal Election Commission, [View all]
pnwmom
Jan 2016
OP
Super pacs aren't supposed to be in direct communication with the candidates.
A Simple Game
Jan 2016
#33
re: "Which is it? Either the guy can do magic and accomplish everything he wants or he can't."
thesquanderer
Jan 2016
#85
Somehow spending $600,000 in attack ads against Bernie is helping him, but when they
Dustlawyer
Jan 2016
#64
Yeah, I'm having difficulty believing a nurses' union has outspent Corrupt the Record. n/t
winter is coming
Jan 2016
#5
Too bad they will be forced to either 1) return the money or 2) spend it on Bernie.
Health Wagon
Jan 2016
#114
This report is on money SPENT and it is quite possible that they've collected money
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#8
Again, moving the goalposts instead of addressing the criticism of Bernie. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2016
#75
Priorities USA is saving most of its funds for the general, according to this article.
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#30
Typical HRC supporter math--counting Republican superpacs as actual Sanders supporters n/t
eridani
Jan 2016
#15
Only in Bernie world is Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation Voters
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#53
Only in Bernie world is Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation Voters
AlbertCat
Jan 2016
#92
There are organizations that bother to poll their members before endorsing, and those that don't
eridani
Jan 2016
#121
Hillary's spent SuperPac money, according to this report, is mostly from Planned Parenthood
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#50
This is his first national race. The "game" is indeed a game. There are rules and these errors the
livetohike
Jan 2016
#102
'New York Times Gets it Wrong: Bernie Sanders Not Top Beneficiary of Outside Money'
Eric J in MN
Jan 2016
#66
Correct the Record raising soft money & letting the Clinton campaign control spending is worse. NT
Eric J in MN
Jan 2016
#78
The nurses spent the money on him; Planned Parenthood and the League of Conservation
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#113
re: "lift Mr. Sanders, whom conservatives believe will be easier to defeat in a general election"
thesquanderer
Jan 2016
#86
Bernie Sanders-the canditate who harps daily against the eveils of Super Pacs Wins. whow!!!!!!!!!!!
riversedge
Jan 2016
#109