Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
11. "...until somebody finally called the question--whose side are you on?"
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:43 PM
Jan 2016


One thing's clear, Bernie doesn't come across as a limousine liberal, and he's absolutely no one's idea of an elitist. Equally significant, he doesn't flinch at being called liberal. Instead of running he digs in, breaking through the labels and going for the substance. After decades of Democrats twisting themselves into knots avoiding being called leftist, Bernie Sanders lays out his “leftist agenda” and says, “What's wrong with that?” And then he turns the tables on right wing propaganda and exposes real class warfare in America, except that it isn't the poor stealing from the middle class, it's the super rich stealing from virtually all of us. What Bernie says rings true to folks because, unlike Reagan’s 1980's fantasy, it's not Morning in America, and this time everybody knows it.

The vaulted supposedly impregnable Republican line of defense spanning decades now could be called 100 shades of red baiting. It is their hardened battle ready position, it is their Maginot Line; so formidable, so unyielding, so entrenched - and so built on lessons learned during previous eras of combat. Like concrete embedded cannons, it is obsolete. It's been trending that way for years, obscured by conventional wisdom, until somebody finally called the question; Whose side are you on?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #1
Bookmarked daleanime Jan 2016 #2
me too. definitely a keeper. nt restorefreedom Jan 2016 #18
. tk2kewl Jan 2016 #3
I love that graphic. Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #4
you'd get a lot of 'em tk2kewl Jan 2016 #5
Thank you. n/t Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #8
There are 34 Senate seats and All 435 House seats up for reelection in 2016 Matariki Jan 2016 #6
No he might not Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #7
Your OP is great Matariki Jan 2016 #9
Oh I knew we agreed. My focus on the possibiity of a Republican Congress... Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #12
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #10
You are very welcome, as always n/t Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #15
"...until somebody finally called the question--whose side are you on?" KoKo Jan 2016 #11
Excellent! K&R Z_California Jan 2016 #13
Astute analysis Armstead Jan 2016 #14
K&R Mbrow Jan 2016 #16
One kick for weekenders. n/t Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #17
K & R Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #19
Great piece, Tom. The irony of Bernie is that it may take a socialist Ron Green Jan 2016 #20
It's interesting how coventional wisdom is rarely critically questioned... Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»President Sanders and a R...»Reply #11