2016 Postmortem

polly7

(20,582 posts)

55. Major Nevada union, Sanders campaign resolve dispute

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:52 PM

Jan 2016

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141329633

Snip: "Culinary has long been at the center of the Nevada caucuses. The union endorsed Barack Obama in 2008, a race where Clinton campaign staffers were accused of trying to infiltrate various casinos and resorts in Las Vegas."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

139 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"How many times does Bernie Sanders have to get caught cheating before we admit there�s a problem?" [View all] BainsBane Jan 2016 OP

Another dishonest hit piece from Hillary shill Bill Palmer, what a shock. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #1

"How many times do conservadems need to try to smear Bernie's integrity before it sticks?" tk2kewl Jan 2016 #9

"smear" BainsBane Jan 2016 #16

rationalize... another nice word tk2kewl Jan 2016 #23

The health care plan isn't based on solid math mythology Jan 2016 #75

I refer you to this excellent op tk2kewl Jan 2016 #77

All you have to do is look at similar systems in other countries AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #90

Hello There... EFFING NONSENSE... BULLSHIT DISTRACTION.. 100% BS! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #89

Where is the influence? BainsBane Jan 2016 #94

Bravo!!! lunamagica Jan 2016 #109

Excellent analysis and discussion. Thank you very much for the huge dose of reality. George II Jan 2016 #110

A must read pandr32 Jan 2016 #112

more proof they are simply anti-Hillary treestar Jan 2016 #113

Excellent points. okasha Jan 2016 #117

Holy cow! That was epic! Excellent post Bains. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #118

BOOM! Squinch Jan 2016 #119

Holy Shit ismnotwasm Jan 2016 #120

If I had ten thumbs, BB.. NastyRiffraff Jan 2016 #126

What's hilarious is that it's coming from supporters of one of the most dishonest campaigners ever. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #22

the tactic might work on uniformed people, but that isn't how this campaign is going down tk2kewl Jan 2016 #25

Her 3am call commercial, refusal to state that Obama wasn't a muslim, the gun mailer... beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #27

It clearly IS working on uninformed people. frylock Jan 2016 #61

Not sure they're uniformed. Likely pushing misinformation on behalf of their preferred candidate. tk2kewl Jan 2016 #63

They're not uniformed Matariki Jan 2016 #69

Feel free to refute BainsBane Jan 2016 #131

Refute what? frylock Jan 2016 #132

All the false claims you insist BainsBane Jan 2016 #133

I'm supposed to prove that Bernie isn't cheating without any evidence being provided that he is? frylock Jan 2016 #134

Everything above has been covered in the press, and the BainsBane Jan 2016 #138

I haven't seen ANY proof that an AARP logo was misappropriated.. frylock Jan 2016 #139

A candidate with a history of sleazy campaigning is trying make Bernie look sleazy. winter is coming Jan 2016 #37

Yep, they've got master Ratfucker Brock doing their dirty work. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #41

The Democrat's Turd Blossom. frylock Jan 2016 #62

exactly... the irony hopemountain Jan 2016 #79

When they resort to red baiting and attacking Bernie on his strengths you know they're desperate. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #100

"Manufactured outrage" BainsBane Jan 2016 #82

She didn't run a racist campaign in 2008? Let's get in the Way Back Machine and have another look: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #97

Sounds like Bill Palmer is Hillary's H.A. Goodman (n/t) thesquanderer Jan 2016 #108

OH MY GOD! The Sanders' campaign tried to paint Sanders in a good light! mhatrw Jan 2016 #125

Let's shoot for.... daleanime Jan 2016 #2

Um, it's pretty clear that these actions were not sanctioned by Bernie, so calling it JudyM Jan 2016 #3

Mailers from his campaign? BainsBane Jan 2016 #6

Do you have a link to the mailers? bunnies Jan 2016 #12

I see, so that's the new tact is it? BainsBane Jan 2016 #24

asking a question is a "tact" now? bunnies Jan 2016 #36

"Tack." The reference is to a ship's tacking to turn its course toward the wind at an angle. tblue37 Jan 2016 #136

Here is the link you requested BainsBane Jan 2016 #48

The mailing accurately notes a fact, his 95% rating. It doesn't claim endorsement. JudyM Jan 2016 #50

Using an organization's logo implies a connection that in this case does not exist. Naughty naughty. Hekate Jan 2016 #51

Kind of like Hillary and DWS TheFarS1de Jan 2016 #85

Thank you. bunnies Jan 2016 #56

How were they delivered? winter is coming Jan 2016 #116

No control over a campaign can be a problem Bjornsdotter Jan 2016 #13

Looks like Newsweek had fewer scruples about those off-the-record tips. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #30

Let's not be gentle with the words: it's a lie, and the OP knows it's a lie n/t arcane1 Jan 2016 #46

Once. elias49 Jan 2016 #4

Cheating like using sock puppets? n/t whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #5

+1 AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #34

Oh, well-played! winter is coming Jan 2016 #39

I think some literall put the same weight behind the two. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #43

Just a little ethical irony n/t whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #45

It certainly discredits the OP, bvar22 Jan 2016 #49

. arcane1 Jan 2016 #47

Exactly. 99Forever Jan 2016 #99

THANK YOU!!! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #101

Well, no. Nothing like that, actually. Orrex Jan 2016 #115

Lying smears from the campaign of lying, cheating and calumny cali Jan 2016 #7

Cali, what there is a lie? BainsBane Jan 2016 #10

Not only did they piss off the union, but with their "union" buttons they accessed.... George II Jan 2016 #20

Major Nevada union, Sanders campaign resolve dispute polly7 Jan 2016 #55

The data breach was in no way his fault and it cali Jan 2016 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author NCTraveler Jan 2016 #44

We should demand answers... Orsino Jan 2016 #8

Once Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #11

ADD this---another deception from nytimes... riversedge Jan 2016 #14

The quote is accurate Bjornsdotter Jan 2016 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2016 #15

Posting this "for informational purposes only"...? closeupready Jan 2016 #17

I'm not so naive as to think information BainsBane Jan 2016 #18

They do matter, particularly facts of the matter as to voting record. closeupready Jan 2016 #33

Bernie has run the most honest and classy campaign I've ever witnessed. bobbobbins01 Jan 2016 #19

answer: more than HRH elehhhhna Jan 2016 #21

That's exactly what I was thinking. djean111 Jan 2016 #31

What a joke. Clinton operative smears Bernie... surprised?? Fearless Jan 2016 #29

Is this the mailer that doesn't have a recipient address? Scootaloo Jan 2016 #32

Exactly. When you blew up that image someone brought here there was polly7 Jan 2016 #54

I'm thinking the reason there's no room for a recipient address is because winter is coming Jan 2016 #123

By reading the envelope BainsBane Jan 2016 #66

Why would there be a postage-paid mark on the mailer, if it's in an envelope? Scootaloo Jan 2016 #70

Both organizations released statements about the mailers BainsBane Jan 2016 #83

That they did. Scootaloo Jan 2016 #88

You don't like LCV would have verified the mailer before issuing the statement? BainsBane Jan 2016 #92

I have no idea if they would or not. Scootaloo Jan 2016 #93

Bernie Sanders didn't do any of this. highprincipleswork Jan 2016 #35

Good piece. Thanks for posting it Bains. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #38

She also accused Obama of cheating in '08 which makes this redux effort twice as funny. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #40

Off the top of my head I would say... Once for every Top Secret email found to have passed... cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #42

Bill Palmer certainly puts it all out there, doesn't he? NurseJackie Jan 2016 #52

I think people have far more to fear nichomachus Jan 2016 #57

That's a very optimistic way of looking at things! :-) Hillary certainly is a fighter! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #58

"Many democrats and liberals..." Scootaloo Jan 2016 #73

Yawn. mhatrw Jan 2016 #53

Good question. yardwork Jan 2016 #59

Comedy gold! frylock Jan 2016 #60

Thank you for posting this, BB. Cha Jan 2016 #64

Oh, get my salts!!! elias49 Jan 2016 #98

Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #65

LOL, you guys are still talking about the non story with the Culinary union that got resolved? jfern Jan 2016 #67

Despicable IGNORE - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #68

I must say, as a life long David Bowie fan, heartbroken from his death, it's a gut punch myrna minx Jan 2016 #71

DU rec...nt SidDithers Jan 2016 #72

LOL liberalnarb Jan 2016 #74

These same accusations fell flat in 2008. Same playbook, different election --> same result. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #76

For some reason I reminded of the Benghazi attacks against Hillary. nt ohnoyoudidnt Jan 2016 #78

Oh, I'm at least gonna let him catch up to Hillary. I doubt he could ever live long enough. nt silvershadow Jan 2016 #80

There is a pattern Gothmog Jan 2016 #81

There they are. 37 of 'em. Ron Green Jan 2016 #84

I think a lot of them are busy doing GOTV in Iowa BainsBane Jan 2016 #87

THEYRE BUSIN' EM IN FROM A DIFFERENT STATE, I TELL YA! Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #95

Let's see...if all else fails, we could actually talk about the issues. jonestonesusa Jan 2016 #86

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAAAA Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #96

Some posters would rather go on about how awful Bernie's supporters are. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #102

K&R ismnotwasm Jan 2016 #91

More conservadem BS Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #103

What's the phrase that means attacking a candidate on his strengths? Swiftboating. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #104

yes. so feeble. hopemountain Jan 2016 #135

Once. Still waiting. nt elias49 Jan 2016 #105

Spreading Ever More FUD - So Predictable cantbeserious Jan 2016 #106

Oh please, spare me this crap. n/t CanonRay Jan 2016 #107

How many times will Hillary change her positions before her supporters admit there's a problem? hobbit709 Jan 2016 #111

His reps on TV are so lowbrow, he has to know R B Garr Jan 2016 #114

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Orrex Jan 2016 #121

Thanks! That is truly an unbelievable explanation R B Garr Jan 2016 #122

Seriously? Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #130

Thanks for your concern. GoneOffShore Jan 2016 #124

K&R Number23 Jan 2016 #127

The Daily News Bin? Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #128

Oh FFS are the Hillary fans getting silly. nt Logical Jan 2016 #129

Op and follow analysis was excellent!! Sheepshank Jan 2016 #137