2016 Postmortem

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)

42. My post States the obvious.

Reply to Metric System (Reply #41)

Fri Jan 29, 2016, 06:51 PM

Jan 2016

You cannot counter it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US declares 22 Clinton emails �top secret� [View all] Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 OP

Nothing to see here. Move along. Bernie wore buttons! Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #1

I don't think there's any question she mishandled classified information. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #2

This is coming from the Whitehouse Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #5

I'm having a hard time believing they're going to do anything about it. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #8

It is awkward if one said that one would be best for the Commander in Chief job Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #10

BOOM. Excellent point. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #11

A commander in chief should be squeaky clean Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #12

I agree. Could the Admin setting it up to agree with her bogus "explanation" Skwmom Jan 2016 #21

The prima facie evidence is there, but it sounds like they are moving the goalposts. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #25

What do you think the deep government wants? HRC fighting the socialist tax-raiser, or HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #35

I will thanks. But I still think this is intended to help her play the victim of the Republicans Skwmom Jan 2016 #43

This is not about evidence. This is about manipulating public opinion for the Iowa vote. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #66

There must be an explanation Fairgo Jan 2016 #3

How can her supporters not see that this is toxic? cali Jan 2016 #4

We will have that answer shortly Fairgo Jan 2016 #6

no smoke without fire Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #18

Nurse Jackie to the ER, stat! Fumesucker Jan 2016 #19

There may be second degree Berns as well! Fairgo Jan 2016 #23

Yep. This is going to be a problem. progressoid Jan 2016 #14

Instead, they call Sanders a commie and say "But this is what repubs will do to him!" n/t arcane1 Jan 2016 #15

Can't see what you don't want to. frylock Jan 2016 #30

Hmmm... deathrind Jan 2016 #7

No doubt. That all came out of nowhere.. frylock Jan 2016 #31

Uh oh. Matariki Jan 2016 #9

This story has legs Jarqui Jan 2016 #13

LA LA LA LA LA LAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #16

Whoops! There goes the Buttongate scandal. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #17

! ejbr Jan 2016 #49

Is the Dept setting it up to agree with her bogus explanation Skwmom Jan 2016 #20

For the public good Hillary, say goodnight Dreadpirate Jan 2016 #22

Welcome farleftlib Jan 2016 #24

Never had a chance to welcome someone's first post. Welcome. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #32

Welcome to DU, Dreadpirate -arrrgghh! n/t ms liberty Jan 2016 #52

They weren't classified at the time they were sent, which is what we've heard all along. Metric System Jan 2016 #26

Dont intefere with the celbration here that the LEADING DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE is being randys1 Jan 2016 #28

They said it didn't matter if they were marked or not 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #33

Your concerns are noted, Sanders supporter. Metric System Jan 2016 #36

"Your concerns are noted" = we can't even try to deny that 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #40

Your post is full on conjecture. What is there to deny or counter? Metric System Jan 2016 #41

My post States the obvious. 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #42

Irrelevant. Classified info is classified even if not marked as such. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #44

Even if it's retroactively classified? Metric System Jan 2016 #45

Let's not insult one another. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #48

I guess you've never heard of it. Metric System Jan 2016 #50

I have and it's the sort of pointless parsing that doesn't make one iota of difference. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #51

That is what Clinton alleges catnhatnh Jan 2016 #57

Dont celebrate the destruction of the leading candidate for the Democratic Party just randys1 Jan 2016 #27

I don't see a problem, so long as no organizational logos had been misappropriated.. frylock Jan 2016 #29

Indeed, almost criminal. Autumn Jan 2016 #46

This is never going away, is it? jillan Jan 2016 #34

If she becomes president, this is a non-story. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #38

I have a sneaking suspicion Obama doesn't want to have to confront the unenviable task of Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #47

The story is getting traction. Renew Deal Jan 2016 #37

I'm going to bet the Impeachment group of Republicans has already had their first meeting. libdem4life Jan 2016 #39

Please, take a cold hard look. BellaKos Jan 2016 #53

Well said awake Jan 2016 #54

All true, but I don't see HRC suspending her campaign until there's an indictment. winter is coming Jan 2016 #63

Still a minor issue since none were marked as classified when they were sent/received. DCBob Jan 2016 #55

ALL 22 emails were also already sitting on the unclassified State Dept.email system.. SunSeeker Jan 2016 #56

Obviously, you have had no eperience in the Intel World. BellaKos Jan 2016 #58

None of this was marked classified at the time it was sent. SunSeeker Jan 2016 #59

Are you in a position to say that? Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #60

That is what the people who have actually seen these emails have said. SunSeeker Jan 2016 #61

I thought that you may work for the government? Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #62

Doesn't matter. BellaKos Jan 2016 #64

Nominating someone with too many issues felix_numinous Jan 2016 #65