Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
27. She's not running for president
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 01:25 AM
Jan 2016

and if she was, would she be asked to sell it?

Are any of the candidates being asked to sell their homes, expensive or not?

and Jane Sanders has off shore accounts DURHAM D Jan 2016 #1
Do you have evidence of that assertion? n/t JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #3
What was that about two wrongs? chapdrum Jan 2016 #4
I suspect not -- the only google hits refer back here and involve conspiracies about Israeli ties. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #8
I think you have Jane mixed up with Hill2016. nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #18
LOL! Good one! Hill2016 is middle class right? JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #20
Yep and have money hidden overseas, apparently. nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #23
And Colonel Sanders is more visible in PR China than Chairman Mao. mwooldri Jan 2016 #50
Do tell, won't you? bvf Jan 2016 #53
See that is that fact adverse thingy we are talking about. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #70
Made up shit. cali Jan 2016 #92
Her whole angle on the ACA smacks of Burkean conservative incrementalism. I think the centrist Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #2
Ed, you're on to something chapdrum Jan 2016 #9
What are you going to do if she wins the nomination? LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #5
What a strange question. What relevance does that have to the present discussion? JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #7
Okay. As this is GD: Primaries, for the sake of discussion, LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #11
Why should I or the OP answer your question when you can't answer how it is relevant to the OP? JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #12
The OP presents a few adorned facts that may or not be relevant to the primary. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #14
Wait, what the actual FUCK? JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #16
+10,000 And well said! nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #19
I'm not trying to get anyone TOS'd. We are discussing the primary. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #21
What effect does a hypothetical scenario where she won the primary have on our choices when voting.. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #24
The OP stated: Some HRC supporters are fact aversive RobertEarl Jan 2016 #48
You can "wait" all you want. senz Jan 2016 #29
Hijack? You are the third person to repond to me. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #34
Requesting personal information is not "disputing facts." senz Jan 2016 #41
The OP would impugn the fact-averse Hillary supporters and their choices. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #44
That's gobbledygook. senz Jan 2016 #49
Nobody is obligated to say whom they would vote for before an election passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #58
I'm not brow-beating anyone. I posed the question once to the OP. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #69
Yes you are. You have been told no over and over again yet you won't let up. passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #75
You are like the sixth person to initiate a discussion with me in this thread. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #80
In various ways you've asked the question or demanded an answer nine times in this thread passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #82
Harassment? I am responding to questions posed and restating my position in response to LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #85
keep on playing passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #87
What are you saying? JackRiddler Jan 2016 #10
There are a lot of facts about Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #15
Still irrelevant. JackRiddler Jan 2016 #22
Are we not discussing this in the context of the primary election? LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #28
You are avoiding the issues of the OP. Why? JackRiddler Jan 2016 #38
What are the issues of the OP? LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #43
.... woooowwww nt retrowire Jan 2016 #46
State the issues... LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #52
....t-they're in the OP. nt retrowire Jan 2016 #55
Which states that some Hillary supporters are as fact aversive as Republicans. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #77
Give up, man. Unknown Beatle Jan 2016 #94
It's fine if the OP does not want to answer. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #109
you're changing the subject of the op retrowire Jan 2016 #99
There are a lot of people here not disputing the facts. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #108
the purpose is to dispute the facts lol retrowire Jan 2016 #110
The purpose of the OP is to impugn Hillary and her supporters using a set of facts. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #112
as the op requested... retrowire Jan 2016 #113
The person you are stalking here is not the OP passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #63
What do you care what the OP will do? senz Jan 2016 #31
see my response #44 LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #45
Not your business at all. 840high Jan 2016 #33
The OP states that some Hillary supporters are as aversive to facts as are Republicans. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #37
I get what you are asking RobertEarl Jan 2016 #54
I'll several steps further than the OP does regarding Hillary's supporters. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #62
Yes RobertEarl Jan 2016 #65
Thanks for drilling down to the crux eom Arazi Jan 2016 #74
As I said, there are a lot of facts about Hillary. We can dispute LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #84
That's just it, don't you get it? Unknown Beatle Jan 2016 #95
Your last paragraph, for example, contains no facts. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #111
Silly me! Unknown Beatle Jan 2016 #118
ah 2 of the 3 D's of Hillsbara distract and divert I guess distort isn't really possible here azurnoir Jan 2016 #56
Hillsbara? Don't know about that. LuvLoogie Jan 2016 #90
How dare you post such negativity about The Inevitable One! reformist2 Jan 2016 #6
I support Clinton and O'Malley ecstatic Jan 2016 #13
Thanks for responding. chapdrum Jan 2016 #17
What's found about Peterson Foundation chapdrum Jan 2016 #36
What is Chelsea's connection to the Peterson Foundation? hedda_foil Jan 2016 #25
thanks Hedda chapdrum Jan 2016 #30
That doesn't answer my question about the Chelsea/Peterson connection you posit. hedda_foil Jan 2016 #32
I didn't notice your question chapdrum Jan 2016 #40
OK, now I see it chapdrum Jan 2016 #42
What do we do with Elizabeth Warren's $5.3 Million mansion? R B Garr Jan 2016 #26
She's not running for president chapdrum Jan 2016 #27
She was the Berniebros obsession before he announced, which R B Garr Jan 2016 #57
200,000 is not a golden parachute for a retiring president of a college. lol nt retrowire Jan 2016 #60
Yes, it was from her struggling former employer. R B Garr Jan 2016 #64
sure i do. a quick Google of retrowire Jan 2016 #67
LOL, how many of those worked for small, struggling R B Garr Jan 2016 #71
Yes, they used to be called pensions and a few of us are still lucky to get something at all. Fearless Jan 2016 #81
"SIZEABLE severance package" is a R B Garr Jan 2016 #83
Who are you even replying to?? Fearless Jan 2016 #117
point stands retrowire Jan 2016 #101
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #103
Nice edit there. You must be afraid that your R B Garr Jan 2016 #78
??? ooookay. lol try harder nt retrowire Jan 2016 #100
Yeah, same to you. Try harder yourself. R B Garr Jan 2016 #105
its clearly not the same but whatever. retrowire Jan 2016 #106
$200,000 is one speech for Hill. lob1 Jan 2016 #93
"Berniebros"? Z_California Jan 2016 #114
whoa uponit7771 Jan 2016 #88
aversive enid602 Jan 2016 #35
Yes. chapdrum Jan 2016 #39
K&R. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #47
FDR came from wealth and had tons of connections to wealth. OhZone Jan 2016 #51
FDR was born to his wealth. He was not paid by powerful lobbyists to speak to their meetings Ford_Prefect Jan 2016 #61
Giving a speech for money, which is super common - OhZone Jan 2016 #66
I assume that the people who pay her $200,000 and more per speech are investing in her future Ford_Prefect Jan 2016 #72
Damn good question that chapdrum Jan 2016 #79
HRC makes 15 million a year, 200,000 is a drop in the bucket for her... she's underpaid uponit7771 Jan 2016 #91
Seriously - OhZone Jan 2016 #96
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2016 #97
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2016 #89
The same can be said about Sanders' supporters. JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #59
At least he's raising the issues chapdrum Jan 2016 #76
Link to promises to pull rabbits out of hats and magic wands please Z_California Jan 2016 #115
I can't believe I'm replying to this... JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #119
The false narrative is yours Z_California Jan 2016 #120
If Bernie can't do those things... JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #122
A Reason Hillary Is Best Friends With The Bushes billhicks76 Jan 2016 #68
Right you are chapdrum Jan 2016 #73
Exactly billhicks76 Jan 2016 #121
Bush even called her his sister-in-law. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #102
So what!? tia uponit7771 Jan 2016 #86
Most importantly, she's the best candidate for president. DanTex Jan 2016 #98
These are facts that should alert peoples logic olddots Jan 2016 #104
You know HC gave a cautionary speech about the Iraq vote pandr32 Jan 2016 #107
note to "ecstatic" chapdrum Jan 2016 #116
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Some HRC supporters are a...»Reply #27