Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Some HRC supporters are as fact aversive [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)47. K&R.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I suspect not -- the only google hits refer back here and involve conspiracies about Israeli ties.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#8
Her whole angle on the ACA smacks of Burkean conservative incrementalism. I think the centrist
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2016
#2
What a strange question. What relevance does that have to the present discussion?
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#7
Why should I or the OP answer your question when you can't answer how it is relevant to the OP?
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#12
The OP presents a few adorned facts that may or not be relevant to the primary.
LuvLoogie
Jan 2016
#14
What effect does a hypothetical scenario where she won the primary have on our choices when voting..
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#24
Nobody is obligated to say whom they would vote for before an election
passiveporcupine
Jan 2016
#58
Yes you are. You have been told no over and over again yet you won't let up.
passiveporcupine
Jan 2016
#75
You are like the sixth person to initiate a discussion with me in this thread.
LuvLoogie
Jan 2016
#80
In various ways you've asked the question or demanded an answer nine times in this thread
passiveporcupine
Jan 2016
#82
Harassment? I am responding to questions posed and restating my position in response to
LuvLoogie
Jan 2016
#85
Which states that some Hillary supporters are as fact aversive as Republicans.
LuvLoogie
Jan 2016
#77
The purpose of the OP is to impugn Hillary and her supporters using a set of facts.
LuvLoogie
Jan 2016
#112
The OP states that some Hillary supporters are as aversive to facts as are Republicans.
LuvLoogie
Jan 2016
#37
ah 2 of the 3 D's of Hillsbara distract and divert I guess distort isn't really possible here
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#56
That doesn't answer my question about the Chelsea/Peterson connection you posit.
hedda_foil
Jan 2016
#32
200,000 is not a golden parachute for a retiring president of a college. lol nt
retrowire
Jan 2016
#60
Yes, they used to be called pensions and a few of us are still lucky to get something at all.
Fearless
Jan 2016
#81
FDR was born to his wealth. He was not paid by powerful lobbyists to speak to their meetings
Ford_Prefect
Jan 2016
#61
I assume that the people who pay her $200,000 and more per speech are investing in her future
Ford_Prefect
Jan 2016
#72
HRC makes 15 million a year, 200,000 is a drop in the bucket for her... she's underpaid
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#91