Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Should Hillary be proud of a 0.35% win? [View all]stonecutter357
(13,060 posts)32. Iowa did not fill the Bern .
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
if this was actually a meaningful vote such numbers would trigger an automatic recount
azurnoir
Feb 2016
#4
Skinner did an OP explaining those "coins" didn't go into determining Hillary's win.
KittyWampus
Feb 2016
#50
But in primaries we always know what the actual vote count is. So we know, for example,
pnwmom
Feb 2016
#49
Yes, because a win is a win. If she lost by the same margin, people would be crowing like hell.
ProudToBeLiberal
Feb 2016
#11
She "won" 6 coin tosses to "win". If I were her campaign I'd be pretty worried eom
Arazi
Feb 2016
#20
a margin so slim that if this vote had any real meaning where election results are concerned
azurnoir
Feb 2016
#23
Uhhhh...NO.....it's on the graphic too 50-50 - A TIE. Clinton lost by not winning. Period.
in_cog_ni_to
Feb 2016
#34
Sanders lost by that margin but his supporters are trying to spin that into a win
Empowerer
Feb 2016
#47
The winners get to crow all they want. Sanders can do the same next week if he wants.
randome
Feb 2016
#57
Anything that doesn't change the dynamic of this race is a win for her.
Bleacher Creature
Feb 2016
#65