Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Live and Learn (Reply #6)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lol. cali Feb 2016 #1
Tailor made to his strengths, still lost. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #2
LOL you 'won' Iowa by .2% or cheating and you brag about it? You are too funny. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #6
Didnt Bernie camp steal campaign data? JaneyVee Feb 2016 #8
Nope. But Hillary did vote for the IWR. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #13
Yup. And Bernie voted for the Afghan War. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #14
Not exactly, he voted to fund the soldiers that were already stuck there thanks to Hillary Live and Learn Feb 2016 #17
Uh no, he voted YES on fighting Afghan War. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #21
Comprehension is everything. Try it. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #22
Do you not see the difference between Iraq and Afghanistan anyway? Live and Learn Feb 2016 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #29
LOL. I am not surprised the NYT is spinning on all 8 cylinders for their candidate. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #3
You should be. The Times is famous for slamming Hortensis Feb 2016 #11
Except they endorsed her. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #18
NY Times Editorial Board endorsed her THREE TIMES, Hortensis Feb 2016 #23
Oh please, what a joke.. Live and Learn Feb 2016 #4
They have no meaningful insight into the way politics works. Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #5
Nate Cohn? The NY Times? Hortensis Feb 2016 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #7
Oh dear. longship Feb 2016 #9
It should give the Hillary team some confidence going into the more diverse states.. DCBob Feb 2016 #10
Exactly. She went from coming in third in 2008 to winning in 2016. SunSeeker Feb 2016 #16
She wins. She loses. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #19
Well, a virtual tie is certainly better than a clear loss John Poet Feb 2016 #12
I don't think so Kalidurga Feb 2016 #24
Because they were going to replace her if she lost? 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #25
Clinton spent $13,000,000 to win 5 delegates EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #26
What Do You Expect The Establishment To Say When.... global1 Feb 2016 #27
yes poor guy can't get an interview dsc Feb 2016 #30
I Also Heard Them Say This Virtual Tie Will Energize Her Base.... global1 Feb 2016 #28
Iowa was a must win for Sanders Gothmog Feb 2016 #31
Obviously. Bernie needed a win. There aren't many states as white and liberal as Iowa. DanTex Feb 2016 #32
Iowa was Bernie's to lose ... and he did. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #33
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why ‘Virtual Tie’ in Iowa...»Reply #29