Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vinca

(53,240 posts)
7. About as close to a tie that has ever been seen in Iowa.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:58 AM
Feb 2016

Pretty impressive considering Bernie started out in single digits.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

All Iowa Precincts Reporting [View all] JaneyVee Feb 2016 OP
Doesn't look like a tie to me either. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #1
Even my old tired eyes are seeing 28-21. :-) Alfresco Feb 2016 #11
28 includes supers which she had in her pocket. So she declared victory before the popular vote leveymg Feb 2016 #18
Yep. Anyone posting "28-21!" without clarification is basically trying to mislead. reformist2 Feb 2016 #20
... Alfresco Feb 2016 #29
Some of Hillary's supporters do tend to follow her lead. Broward Feb 2016 #41
Precinct 42 hasn't reported and Sanders won there. kristopher Feb 2016 #43
And obfuscate. Stick a fork in Hillary. She's done. - nt KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #57
The Socialist is still in the running? RobertEarl Feb 2016 #22
Which is funny because even if they say they're voting for her Fearless Feb 2016 #32
Looks Like Clinton Won by a Touchdown and Extra Point Stallion Feb 2016 #23
Looks like she won by a fraction of one percent. 4 votes out of 1400. A pyrrhic victory, at best. leveymg Feb 2016 #28
Superdelegates vote at the convention, this is a dishonest Fearless Feb 2016 #33
MSNBC is showing 30-21 on their live tv graphics. :-) Alfresco Feb 2016 #38
Looks Like Clinton Added a Safety in Overtime Stallion Feb 2016 #63
Well it wasn't a blow out Autumn Feb 2016 #2
Nobody expected it would. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #5
Oh a few here expected it. nt Autumn Feb 2016 #8
Not the realistic ones. Agschmid Feb 2016 #12
Not everyone here on DU is realistic, and a couple posters here expected a huge Hillary win . Autumn Feb 2016 #17
On the Bernie side, yes. DanTex Feb 2016 #24
Comments on a blog saying that Bernie could come in first. It was close. Autumn Feb 2016 #42
Funny how the word "will" gets changed into "could", isn't it? DanTex Feb 2016 #44
Depends on the meaning of the word is doesn't it Dan. Autumn Feb 2016 #47
Well, they do have different meanings. That's why you decided to replace one with the other. DanTex Feb 2016 #48
Ya got me Dan, ya got me. You hillary supporters are some of the most graceful Autumn Feb 2016 #50
That final delegate count will almost certainly change MineralMan Feb 2016 #3
True, barely a blip on total delegate count. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #9
"Who" jham123 Feb 2016 #4
No one really "voted" welcome to land of crazy caucuses. Agschmid Feb 2016 #13
Still seems to be something going on to finalize numbers ... Jarqui Feb 2016 #6
Seems like a huge mess jkbRN Feb 2016 #25
About as close to a tie that has ever been seen in Iowa. Vinca Feb 2016 #7
Yes, because as you guys said ad nauseum, he didn't have "name recognition." MoonRiver Feb 2016 #14
You fail to mention that jkbRN Feb 2016 #30
We can interpret the facts in a number of ways, but Iowa was not an easy state for Hillary to win. MoonRiver Feb 2016 #46
The new goal post moving meme. Fearless Feb 2016 #34
He can in a very close second, a virtual tie in a satate where Autumn Feb 2016 #45
Apparently he lost because of some coin tosses. I wouldn't crow too much. LOL. Vinca Feb 2016 #59
That has been debunked about 20 times today. MoonRiver Feb 2016 #60
Actually, I don't. All I'm saying is Hillary's win was by a hair. Vinca Feb 2016 #62
Um, that is counting superdelegates rather disingenuously. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #10
Delegates can switch at the next level too 4dsc Feb 2016 #36
Only after the first ballot. jeff47 Feb 2016 #37
Superdelegates are not bound to a candidate. jeff47 Feb 2016 #15
It's a lie is what it is. Fearless Feb 2016 #35
Hear, hear! John Poet Feb 2016 #61
Really a solid night. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #16
She spent a pile of money and damaged her future primary results for a tie. jeff47 Feb 2016 #21
Nicely stated! jkbRN Feb 2016 #27
I don't think she damaged anything down the road. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #40
She pulled money and staff from super Tuesday states. jeff47 Feb 2016 #49
What Is the delegate count out of Iowa? NCTraveler Feb 2016 #52
At the moment, 22-21, 1 unawarded. jeff47 Feb 2016 #54
So, 20ish has brought you to the bold comment... NCTraveler Feb 2016 #56
Do you really think one delegate is going to decide the nomination? jeff47 Feb 2016 #58
49 total delegates? Neat trick... gcomeau Feb 2016 #19
Your numbers include Super Delegates hoosierlib Feb 2016 #26
This map is based on "Clinton trails, Clinton leads" ummmmm jkbRN Feb 2016 #31
MSNBC is showing 30-21 on their live tv graphics. :-) Alfresco Feb 2016 #39
Surprise... Kentonio Feb 2016 #55
excellent arguments for iowa to end their caucus 'system' rurallib Feb 2016 #51
Clinton the clear winner. Maybe by a hair, but still a win. I would concede though, Lil Missy Feb 2016 #53
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»All Iowa Precincts Report...»Reply #7