Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Discussion: Biggest loser "Not Hillary" Party -- appropriate or not? [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)14. You're kidding, right?
I don't think anyone has said that Sanders supporters are not 'true Democrats'
The graphic in the OP literally throws Sanders supporters into the "Not Hillary" party. How on Earth is that not saying they are not 'true Democrats'?
but there are many here who have proclaimed they will not vote for the nominee if it's not someone they approve of.
How DARE those evil people think they have a choice in their vote!!!!!
Either remaining candidate is going to have to win over the supporters of the other candidate. Taking any voters for granted is how we lost 2014, 2010, 2004, 2002 and 2000.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Discussion: Biggest loser "Not Hillary" Party -- appropriate or not? [View all]
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
OP
They don't get that. I got same stuff from Ohio this morning. If you point it out? You're negative!
ViseGrip
Feb 2016
#3
blow it off like I did with the 'berners are being groomed to be psychos' and
roguevalley
Feb 2016
#29
Oh they want the votes of the Not Hillary" Party. As long as we shut up and sit down
Autumn
Feb 2016
#5
Yup. It is my duty as a citizen to help to elect the best government possible. Country before
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2016
#31
This was a tie. Bernie came back from 30 points down to tie the so-called "inevitable"
ViseGrip
Feb 2016
#7
Clinton got 23 delegates (29 when you toss in Super Delegates, Sanders 21. Not a tie.
George II
Feb 2016
#26
Supers haven't been awarded yet so maybe you could not count your chickens before they hatch,
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2016
#32
for some reason, I was wtching MSNBC and they were covering a Sanders rally for a change,
hollysmom
Feb 2016
#11
Do you condemn the image for denying our status as members of the Democratic party?
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#12
Discussing issues is fine but the vitriol leveled at Clinton is in amazingly bad taste.
randome
Feb 2016
#13
Don't forget O'Malley supporters, who really lost badly last night and this stings them even more.nt
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#15
Maybe. Maybe not. I don't know. Even if she won big though, this image would be just as insulting.
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#20
Already did. Vitriol leveled at one group of supporters 'inspires' more vitriol.
randome
Feb 2016
#24
It immediately brought to my mind the ABC (anybody but Clinton and Anybody but Carter)
karynnj
Feb 2016
#51
I raise the point because it will continue to be the meme until her likely nomination
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#35