Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 03:43 PM Sep 2012

Romney & the Republicans have fucked up with their debate expectations... [View all]

I don't quite get it, but whatever.

Romney's biggest mistake was putting a timeline on his campaign by suggesting he'd turn things around at the debate. That right there was dumb. No campaign would ever give out a definitive point they need to turn things around to win. It's absolutely devastating because if that point passes, and they're still in the same position, they've pretty much just conceded defeat - a month, now, before the election.

Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.

But even more stupid has been all these Republicans going on national television highlighting the importance of the debate and suggesting Romney is going to have some major zingers at his disposal. They're already inflating the expectations so much that it's going to be impossible for Romney to succeed. He just can't have a narrow win over Obama in the debates ... he can't even have a comfortable win. No, he's going to have to have a blowout win ... a knockout punch and that is just not likely.

If he doesn't get it, if we leave the first debate with the same narrative as we entered, well, he's just written the obituary on his campaign himself.

Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wouldn't that be the ultimate zinger? TheCowsCameHome Sep 2012 #1
Do you really expect him to change any of his failed etch-a-sketches now? lunatica Sep 2012 #2
They are setting up the "win" narrative. Warren Stupidity Sep 2012 #3
He already has the dimwit vote locked up anyway, though. n/t charlyvi Sep 2012 #7
I am pissed off. How dare Romney act like this is a freakin game to him. People are looking southernyankeebelle Sep 2012 #4
I don't really think he is a serious candidate dballance Sep 2012 #9
That's why I think he is Sarah Palin in a dress. southernyankeebelle Sep 2012 #21
I thought Liberalagogo Sep 2012 #23
Sometimes it's hard to tell who is on top of the ticket. southernyankeebelle Sep 2012 #29
After you have so much money it becomes a game of power. L0oniX Sep 2012 #24
Well I sure think the american people want facts and not zingers. southernyankeebelle Sep 2012 #28
What you call stupid I call brilliant. obxhead Sep 2012 #5
They act cin63 Sep 2012 #6
No, no, no. There will be no answers, just zingers. Live and Learn Sep 2012 #18
Silly ...Red Zinger is a tea. L0oniX Sep 2012 #25
Silly me. And all this time I thought a zinger was a pink twinkie. Live and Learn Sep 2012 #26
Since the GOP has been the architect of plunging this country into more debt after it created it Rosa Luxemburg Sep 2012 #8
Reboot.Reboot.Reboot. n/t Jeroen Sep 2012 #10
What hasn't Romney fucked up BootinUp Sep 2012 #11
And I, for one, will be totally persuaded truebluegreen Sep 2012 #12
Maybe they believe he has nothing to lose at this point. crim son Sep 2012 #13
Zingers? Really?! JohnLWilder Sep 2012 #14
Team Obama Ad on mitt's "Great Expectations".. Cha Sep 2012 #15
Love it! janx Sep 2012 #17
the heaven05 Sep 2012 #19
Excellent DNC Ad - We Better Be Weeping At Romney's Eloquence! TomCADem Sep 2012 #22
I cannot figure out how the Romney campaign has spent so very much money janx Sep 2012 #16
After this debate the media will play up foreign affairs as THE debate. I've seen it so many times. Zen Democrat Sep 2012 #20
If Rob-me says ONE sensible, meaningful, true thing, I will apologize for being so hard on him. judesedit Sep 2012 #27
How is Rmoney going to win a debate? Wouldn't that require having a position on an issue? D23MIURG23 Oct 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Romney & the Republic...»Reply #0