2016 Postmortem

pnwmom

(110,286 posts)

55. He said she would win and she did, 23 to 21 delegates. nt

Reply to Flying Phoenix (Reply #19)

Wed Feb 3, 2016, 11:25 PM

Feb 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders gets national polling bump from Iowa; Hillary flat [View all] morningfog Feb 2016 OP

He is the one, who accomplished so much with none of the help Hillary had. GO BERNIE! ViseGrip Feb 2016 #1

Exactly right cali Feb 2016 #3

Go Bernie IS RIGHT!!! InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #27

I so hope that is our ticket this year Politicalboi Feb 2016 #32

Now if he can only have people who can count tally the votes. LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #37

Looks like a long term trend taking shape gyroscope Feb 2016 #2

Is it any wonder? Anyone who listens to Bernie knows he's for the "little guy" on Main Street... InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #4

Ding! And IF this gets reported on tonight, please post it here. Thx. ViseGrip Feb 2016 #6

By an online pollster who isn't listed on Nate Silver's site pnwmom Feb 2016 #17

Nate missed his mark on the caucus Flying Phoenix Feb 2016 #19

Next?...try this "CORRECTION...we made a mistake" pkdu Feb 2016 #36

Wow... I didn't realize he had broken above 30%. Yay!! Go Bernie Go! JimDandy Feb 2016 #53

He said she would win and she did, 23 to 21 delegates. nt pnwmom Feb 2016 #55

22-22. The vote was too tight for Clinton to get the 23rd. She didn't even get 50%. (nt) w4rma Feb 2016 #56

Wrong. She officially got 23, because of the way they distribute delegates in the pnwmom Feb 2016 #57

No. It's 22-22: Precinct delegate weighting is calculated into the state delegate equivalent counts. w4rma Feb 2016 #59

The Associated Press explained why it was 23 to 21 and many others reported it. pnwmom Feb 2016 #60

I stand corrected. I'd been looking for that information for a while now. Thanks. (nt) w4rma Feb 2016 #61

Sour grapes, as usual. pangaia Feb 2016 #45

Anymore when I read Nate Silvers name madokie Feb 2016 #46

4% is a pretty astronomical number when you put it that way. frylock Feb 2016 #33

except it wasnt... pkdu Feb 2016 #34

Still pretty large in comparison to .3% frylock Feb 2016 #35

Given that in the same poll Clinton also went up 1% mythology Feb 2016 #39

It would.. speaktruthtopower Feb 2016 #5

I thought that Sanders Supporters didn't believe the polls CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #7

Lol. It's you Hillaryites who say Bernie supporters don't believe polls cali Feb 2016 #9

Maybe you should quit laughing and read some of your Bernie brothers' posts CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #12

I love how people at this site all love Bernie and his positions and his beliefs before Feeling the Bern Feb 2016 #23

Lol. Glad your saving your later posts. morningfog Feb 2016 #10

He doesn't have "a few month" CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #14

I'm happy where we are. morningfog Feb 2016 #21

When people begin to realize that Hillary's poll numbers are inflated by dirty Wall Street money & other questionable sources... InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #30

This whole "I thought that..." shtick is really past it's shelf life.. frylock Feb 2016 #38

In Iowa, Bernie did slightly better than the polls. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #51

HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Feb 2016 #8

The polls are shit and underreporting Bernie support musiclawyer Feb 2016 #11

for Sanders and his campaign, there are no states to be written off MisterP Feb 2016 #15

Yea, like the minorities in Nevada and South Carolina care... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #18

laugh now. everyone Laffed @ iowa roguevalley Feb 2016 #26

lily white? Lazy Daisy Feb 2016 #40

Clinton Cares Nothing About Black People billhicks76 Feb 2016 #41

"Lily white?" pangaia Feb 2016 #48

And Hillary spent a lot of time in Iowa and lost 30% of her support, next. n/t A Simple Game Feb 2016 #52

An online poll conducted by an outfit called "Morning consult"? pnwmom Feb 2016 #13

Ah, so you discredit yourself. Flying Phoenix Feb 2016 #22

It's an online poll and not listed with 538. I don't care who it favored before or now. pnwmom Feb 2016 #31

And neither should you if this is is an example of their work.. pkdu Feb 2016 #43

Damn. I never realized she was that far ahead. Holy Shit! nt arely staircase Feb 2016 #16

Careful, on a steep hill one misstep will send you tumbling down CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #20

+1 NurseJackie Feb 2016 #44

Bernie gets a "bump", Hillary is "flat"? whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #24

Lol billhicks76 Feb 2016 #42

Big K&R!! Duval Feb 2016 #25

This message was self-deleted by its author George II Feb 2016 #28

That's all she needs. SansACause Feb 2016 #47

Good news. The momentum is building for Sanders. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #49

I was phone banking South Carolina this evening for about an hour... MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #50

What are you talking about? Those numbers don't match what's on Huffpo's site - both increased. Dem2 Feb 2016 #54

k&r amborin Feb 2016 #58

. LiberalElite Feb 2016 #62