Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

DanTex

(20,709 posts)

11. No, it's the plain truth. It's laughable that you think that the Intercept is a trusted source to

Reply to cali (Reply #8)

Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:41 PM

Feb 2016

comment on Sanders and Clinton.

The reality is that the differential is even more heavily tilted in Sanders' favor if you also include all the right-wing SuperPAC money running ads on his behalf. The NYT article counted "express support", which is also fine with me. The intercept wants to count some additional spending on Hillary's behalf, but ignore the additional spending on Bernie's behalf.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How many SuperPacs does Hillary have? A lot. [View all] cali Feb 2016 OP

And yet in the primary, Bernie has gotten more SuperPAC support than Hillary. DanTex Feb 2016 #1

Prove Your Assertion - Otherwise - Stop Spreading Myths cantbeserious Feb 2016 #3

NYT: Bernie Sanders Tops His Rivals in Use of Outside Money DanTex Feb 2016 #4

Hit Peice By NYT - False Equivalency - That Is Not A Bernie SuperPac - That Is A Union SuperPac cantbeserious Feb 2016 #7

It's a lie based on a technicality. But you know that cali Feb 2016 #8

No, it's the plain truth. It's laughable that you think that the Intercept is a trusted source to DanTex Feb 2016 #11

That is so lame, I almost pity you cali Feb 2016 #5

Pity or not, it's the truth. DanTex Feb 2016 #6

No cali Feb 2016 #9

Money Corrupts Absolutely - HRC - Patron Saint Of The 1% cantbeserious Feb 2016 #2

Don't forget EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #10