2016 Postmortem

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

5. There has been one released, guess you missed it.

Reply to Joe the Revelator (Original post)

Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:55 PM

Feb 2016

It was talking about businesses owned by women and Goldman Sachs had a program to assist them to help grow their businesses.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

103 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

48 hours later:Has Hillary Released the Goldman Sacs Transcripts Yet? [View all] Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 OP

must be still looking Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #1

They're being edited, that takes a little time. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #2

She's "looking into it". johnnyrocket Feb 2016 #3

No. She's not falling into any anti Hillary trap. oasis Feb 2016 #4

Sorry-too late.... catnhatnh Feb 2016 #6

You forgot the second part of #3... Agschmid Feb 2016 #7

No catnhatnh Feb 2016 #13

Nah... I think I nailed it the first time. Agschmid Feb 2016 #14

Just to be clear, you're good with no transparency? Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #12

So you want Senator Sanders to release details of his retreat conversations with Goldman Sachs, JP MADem Feb 2016 #18

You do see a difference between.... Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #22

One person is badgered to report what she said for money as a private citizen, while the public MADem Feb 2016 #37

So, you agree that Hillary should release her transcripts? Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #39

You might want to check the link at post 68.... MADem Feb 2016 #73

I'm good with Hillary avoiding any manufactured bullshit. oasis Feb 2016 #90

If she has nothing to hide Lorien Feb 2016 #31

How can she "produce" them .... if none were made? MADem Feb 2016 #38

Did you know that Chuck Todd stated they have knowledge there are transcripts? JRLeft Feb 2016 #45

Mmmm. Chuck TAWD--I don't put much stock in what he has to say but sure, whatever. MADem Feb 2016 #49

Even Rachel acknowledged just that. JRLeft Feb 2016 #56

You sure about that? Or are you "interpreting" what you thought she said. MADem Feb 2016 #70

If you don't put much stock in Chuck how about the Intercept? aesop55 Feb 2016 #102

Do you really believe that speech was extemporaneous, that she didn't even have crib notes? hobbit709 Feb 2016 #93

Have you ever seen her at a town hall? Apparently not. MADem Feb 2016 #100

"You have nothing to fear ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #76

There has been one released, guess you missed it. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #5

That was a Clinton Foundation speech - not one that paid her directly $250K RiverLover Feb 2016 #8

Must have been worth it, she gave more than one, I doubt they Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #15

I'm sure it will be worth it if she's elected. frylock Feb 2016 #29

that was a public speech........it was not her private speech to Goldman Sachs virtualobserver Feb 2016 #9

Then maybe we could get Sanders fund raisers with Goldman Sachs. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #10

why do you think that Goldman Sachs just handing cash to Hillary for her personal use..... virtualobserver Feb 2016 #19

Maybe I want to know what he said in a fund raiser verses what Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #23

Bernie was fundraising for the DSCC, not for himself. virtualobserver Feb 2016 #32

Crickets....... libdem4life Feb 2016 #36

She has also donated to charities, so glad to know Sanders has donated money to charities, Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #43

bernie never cashes in, and hillary cashes in like no one I've ever seen virtualobserver Feb 2016 #44

Establishment, going to Goldman Sachs to get funds, isn't this what Sanders said made establishment? Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #46

you have no idea who Bernie talked to at these fundraisers virtualobserver Feb 2016 #48

Yes, we do. He gave "speeches" at those fundraisers. MADem Feb 2016 #52

"one of the Big Money Donors said he didn't say anything that was disturbing to the banking set." virtualobserver Feb 2016 #59

His "crime" (that's your embarrassing word, not mine) was telling his supporters that he doesn't MADem Feb 2016 #63

DSCC donations are from many sources,did they specifically direct the dirty wall st money to Bernie? virtualobserver Feb 2016 #66

Gee, sixty grand of that Wall Street money went to one of his Senate campaigns.... MADem Feb 2016 #50

please stop embarrassing yourself virtualobserver Feb 2016 #60

Why don't you take your own advice, there, sport? How many times are you going to repeat MADem Feb 2016 #65

so the Democratic donors are exclusively wall streeters? virtualobserver Feb 2016 #67

No, of course not. They are Big Pharma moguls, like Dena Minning, and MIC types from MADem Feb 2016 #69

so you are saying that the Democratic Party is funded exclusively by Big Business. virtualobserver Feb 2016 #72

Are you going to continue with the "So you are blah blah" line of questioning? MADem Feb 2016 #74

it is what you are saying....I am trying to force you to accept the implications of your assertion virtualobserver Feb 2016 #77

No, I'm not. I am creating a very real comparison between someone who gives a speech MADem Feb 2016 #81

"wall st money" "laundered by the DSCC" that is the smear and not even an artful one virtualobserver Feb 2016 #85

Stow the drama--please. MADem Feb 2016 #87

Actually, nobody buys any of this, unless they have an H with an arrow burned into their brain cells virtualobserver Feb 2016 #95

You keep calling me a liar. That's incredibly uncivil conduct. MADem Feb 2016 #98

I have no idea if you believe what you are saying or not. virtualobserver Feb 2016 #99

IOKIYABS, apparently. He doesn't have to reveal what HE said, while collecting a government MADem Feb 2016 #21

Probably is not the same line he is peddling now, huh. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #24

I've seen pics of him w/Dena Minning. MADem Feb 2016 #55

Interesting the times he is in the company of lobbyists and Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #91

Too bad that is not one of the three Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #35

Lame try. 840high Feb 2016 #61

I expect to see the transcripts Aerows Feb 2016 #11

Hey ma! Look! OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #16

I'll bet there aren't any, unless the people who issued the invitation either recorded the speech or MADem Feb 2016 #17

If we are going to be fair, its important to know how a person running for president line their.... Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #20

No, at the time Sanders was doing this he was an elected official, Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #26

Wow, that's a twister!! MADem Feb 2016 #28

I have no idea what your overly long acronym says.... Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #30

Sure you do. MADem Feb 2016 #33

Lets cut to the chase, do you think both Bernie and Hillary should release whatever transcripts are Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #34

Simple answer--I don't think there ARE any "transcripts" -- as I told you upthread. MADem Feb 2016 #42

Another gotcha moment for the Non compos mentis HRC supporters!! Iggy Knorr Feb 2016 #41

Just FYI chervilant Feb 2016 #79

But we already know. She gave speeches, for which she was paid. Like Jimmy Carter gets paid. MADem Feb 2016 #62

It was in her contract that there be transcripts and that she would alone take possession of them Dragonfli Feb 2016 #54

So what? Because Chuck Tawd says this, it "must be true?" nt MADem Feb 2016 #57

Her contract said it also, and more the transcript fee of $1,250 must be paid by the event /nt Dragonfli Feb 2016 #58

I think you're going to have to cough up the specific contract before I believe you or the shoddy MADem Feb 2016 #68

No problem it is a boierplate one that she uses with specific conditions to be met Dragonfli Feb 2016 #71

Unnnnh, no, that's not "proof." There's no evidence that she uses the same contract at every venue MADem Feb 2016 #78

What is she looking into if nothing exists and can you prove the producers of the debate Dragonfli Feb 2016 #82

"You always cut your own throat with Occam's razor on these fabrications of yours" MADem Feb 2016 #84

You think he would lie about that during a televised debate where he could easily be caught Dragonfli Feb 2016 #75

I don't care what's in the 'transcripts' she now may provide. I just count the money paid to her. ViseGrip Feb 2016 #25

tick-tock frylock Feb 2016 #27

Looking is hard. Maybe too hard. She probably 'Can't Do' it. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #40

No, there is even a clock website to see how long it takes to look into it Dragonfli Feb 2016 #47

Oh my - love it! 840high Feb 2016 #64

That is Hillarious! jillan Feb 2016 #86

Bookmarked. LOL. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #94

Nope. Not yet. Still waiting. Fearless Feb 2016 #51

Probably on the dining room side table, next to the Rose Law Firm billing records. Nt HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #53

Yes, the whole world is waiting. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #80

And I am waiting, as are others, of how the Hillary campaign got our information (names, emails) jillan Feb 2016 #88

Why is it ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #89

Lol, you get sillier by the week. Nt Logical Feb 2016 #101

And so it goes here at BU ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #103

Nope. n/t warrprayer Feb 2016 #83

They will be srubbed if they appear. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #92

Let me check if UglyGreed Feb 2016 #96

I think, if they ever see the light of day, they'll be boring as hell. Buns_of_Fire Feb 2016 #97