Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I'm a little disappointed with the outrage and conspiracies surround the speaking fees. [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)84. I don't like the smell of this...
Sorry. Wow, that was a horrible joke.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm a little disappointed with the outrage and conspiracies surround the speaking fees. [View all]
DanTex
Feb 2016
OP
I like both Bernie and Hillary. If anyone wanted me to speak, I would be collecting fees too.
RKP5637
Feb 2016
#2
Not a big fan, although Summers sometimes says reasonable things (but other times not).
DanTex
Feb 2016
#8
Oh, their policies. I think that the Clinton deregulation in the 90s was bad and set the stage
DanTex
Feb 2016
#17
This, in addition to your disappointment that Bernie's supporters are not switching to Hillary
djean111
Feb 2016
#9
a SHRILL? wtf....I think you meant shill but SHRILL is kinda cute coming from a supporter or hers!
m-lekktor
Feb 2016
#47
I'd have asked for more. How about you? Also I would have checked to see what men were getting.
Hekate
Feb 2016
#90
Uh, there is one common thread here...in case you missed it..they are all National and Establishment
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#25
I agree..she's the master of nuance and they already know what she'll do. But IDK if she loses the
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#74
A Board of Directors has to authorize a speaking fee. Are you trying to tell me that these Boards
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#103
They are chosen for accountability...usually don't get paid. Stockholders care a great deal, thus
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#107
Cherry picking the noncontroversial speeches out of the list doesn't make the controversial ones
think
Feb 2016
#29
Hey, the more conspiracies the better. Honestly I think that anyone who's every been paid
DanTex
Feb 2016
#31
These are facts Dan. She was paid by corporations that have dubious histories & benefit from US govt
think
Feb 2016
#41
Please feel free to try & defend Goldman Sachs all you want. GE benefits big time from Hillary:
think
Feb 2016
#50
You can talk about goalposts. I'll try to discuss the historical background of GS and GTCR.
think
Feb 2016
#122
Thank you for this. If Hillary becomes president she's going to make us all go camping, isn't she.
betsuni
Feb 2016
#35
So your argument is essentially 7.7 million is nothing when compared to all the other money she took
Bjorn Against
Feb 2016
#39
More or less. Even if it was only the 7.7, knowing what actually happens at corporate events,
DanTex
Feb 2016
#43
Not everyone who has worked in the private sector gets paid 200k to give a speech
Bjorn Against
Feb 2016
#49
No, but if you're vote most admired woman in America 15 years running, then you do.
DanTex
Feb 2016
#52
If Michael Moore or Noam Chomsky were running for President that might be an issue
Bjorn Against
Feb 2016
#57
But if they did, we could count on you to object that their speaking fees have corrupted them.
DanTex
Feb 2016
#58
You might have a point if I had said that all speaking fees are bad, but I did not say that.
Bjorn Against
Feb 2016
#62
It's one of the silliest criticism I've seen by Democrats of another Democrat in my life.
stevenleser
Feb 2016
#46
Get real. It's the number of zeros that is, uh, suspect. Future benefits of an inevitable President
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#79
6 figure fees are not a joke. They are purchased influence. Not silly, either. There is intent.
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#98
Unless your name is Clinton. They have appeared to be improper for years and have mastered
libdem4life
Feb 2016
#89
Sanders has changed the race, and many people are still struggling with that concept.
LS_Editor
Feb 2016
#70
Release the transcripts. Problem solved. Deflect or dodge, doesn't add up to what she has said.
highprincipleswork
Feb 2016
#71
$250 k an hour for a speaking engagement.. And they only made 7.7 million from the banks.
raindaddy
Feb 2016
#76
It's kind of like Obama and releasing the birth certificate. Is that really going to matter to
DanTex
Feb 2016
#100
Yes, there were. Good point. There were also people who thought that Hillary had
DanTex
Feb 2016
#113
There are also people that think Wall Street Bank execs paid the Clinton's $7.5 million to .........
raindaddy
Feb 2016
#115
You left out the Camping Association. Those are the guys you really need to look out for!
DanTex
Feb 2016
#116
No worries, Hillary will march right into their s'more roast and tell em to, "cut it out!!!"
raindaddy
Feb 2016
#120
The Fragrance Foundation conspiracies just write themselves. The odor of sanctity....
Hekate
Feb 2016
#80
The National Camping Association was supposed to ensure a tent big enough for the whole Dem Party...
Hekate
Feb 2016
#96
We can also argue about what "the majority of the population" thinks all day long.
DanTex
Feb 2016
#110
Favorability is far from the only category people use to decide on a president.
DanTex
Feb 2016
#114