Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm shocked. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #1
Was the Brotherhood of Electrical Workers involved? Hekate Feb 2016 #81
I like both Bernie and Hillary. If anyone wanted me to speak, I would be collecting fees too. RKP5637 Feb 2016 #2
I'm just curious... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #3
Not a big fan, although Summers sometimes says reasonable things (but other times not). DanTex Feb 2016 #8
LOL... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #12
Oh, their policies. I think that the Clinton deregulation in the 90s was bad and set the stage DanTex Feb 2016 #17
Bad ideas though, wouldn't you agree? TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #18
The 90s deregulation, yes. But on policy, Obama has been (mostly) good. DanTex Feb 2016 #24
Both Hillary and Bernie will do what they can to overturn riversedge Feb 2016 #19
I really hope so... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #21
I doubt it. earthside Feb 2016 #65
What conspiracy? They were offered pay to perform. They accepted. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #4
And as the old southern saying goes, bvf Feb 2016 #73
Molly Ivins... RIP. libdem4life Feb 2016 #82
Yep! bvf Feb 2016 #97
The Green Building Council? THE HORROR KittyWampus Feb 2016 #5
Hahaha! You out-astuted me Wampus. Well done! elias49 Feb 2016 #27
LOOK AWAY LOOK AWAY THE CAMPERS KittyWampus Feb 2016 #124
It's a legitimate concern, not a conspiracy theory farleftlib Feb 2016 #6
She has not refused to release the transcripts. Hekate Feb 2016 #85
she basically did Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #105
No conspiracy, no artful smear. Just Hillary cashing in Dems to Win Feb 2016 #7
Campaign contributions TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #15
No, we've not forgotten about campaign contributions Dems to Win Feb 2016 #26
This, in addition to your disappointment that Bernie's supporters are not switching to Hillary djean111 Feb 2016 #9
This is new to me: TubbersUK Feb 2016 #10
me too questionseverything Feb 2016 #30
Clinton = Shady libdem4life Feb 2016 #83
interesting Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #106
Thanks. 840high Feb 2016 #108
yeah...and let's not even talk about the CGI hoosierlib Feb 2016 #11
Do you have the slightest clue what the CGI does with its time and money? Hekate Feb 2016 #87
Yes...and do you know who works for it? hoosierlib Feb 2016 #95
Where is Emily Litella when you need her? NurseJackie Feb 2016 #13
Plus 10000 JustAnotherGen Feb 2016 #34
You called? Contrary1 Feb 2016 #63
"It's always something" Hekate Feb 2016 #88
I'm very disappointed that ANYONE can't see the problem. cali Feb 2016 #14
Exactly farleftlib Feb 2016 #20
+1 JudyM Feb 2016 #33
oh. Hill is nothing but a shrill for the ---US Green Building Council riversedge Feb 2016 #16
Well you're right. She is elias49 Feb 2016 #28
a SHRILL? wtf....I think you meant shill but SHRILL is kinda cute coming from a supporter or hers! m-lekktor Feb 2016 #47
Me, I'm a little disappointed with the speaking fees themselves. 'Nuff said. mak3cats Feb 2016 #22
I'd have asked for more. How about you? Also I would have checked to see what men were getting. Hekate Feb 2016 #90
I love this post! treestar Feb 2016 #23
Attar of Roses is what it is Hekate Feb 2016 #91
Uh, there is one common thread here...in case you missed it..they are all National and Establishment libdem4life Feb 2016 #25
You pay Hillary Clinton to speak for exactly one reason Recursion Feb 2016 #69
I agree..she's the master of nuance and they already know what she'll do. But IDK if she loses the libdem4life Feb 2016 #74
Recursion: I think you hit the nail on the head. Hekate Feb 2016 #92
A Board of Directors has to authorize a speaking fee. Are you trying to tell me that these Boards libdem4life Feb 2016 #103
Yes Recursion Feb 2016 #104
They are chosen for accountability...usually don't get paid. Stockholders care a great deal, thus libdem4life Feb 2016 #107
Cherry picking the noncontroversial speeches out of the list doesn't make the controversial ones think Feb 2016 #29
Hey, the more conspiracies the better. Honestly I think that anyone who's every been paid DanTex Feb 2016 #31
These are facts Dan. She was paid by corporations that have dubious histories & benefit from US govt think Feb 2016 #41
Are there any corporations that it's OK to be paid by, in your view? DanTex Feb 2016 #45
Please feel free to try & defend Goldman Sachs all you want. GE benefits big time from Hillary: think Feb 2016 #50
Oooo, let us know if the goalposts get moved in the Superbowl too. Hekate Feb 2016 #93
Whatever. Hope you had a nice day. think Feb 2016 #121
You can talk about goalposts. I'll try to discuss the historical background of GS and GTCR. think Feb 2016 #122
give us a break EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #32
Thanks for bringing the Clinton foundation into this. If I have time, I'll make DanTex Feb 2016 #37
Against the advice of pretty much everyone? Kaleva Feb 2016 #38
Thank you for this. If Hillary becomes president she's going to make us all go camping, isn't she. betsuni Feb 2016 #35
DU rec...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #36
So your argument is essentially 7.7 million is nothing when compared to all the other money she took Bjorn Against Feb 2016 #39
More or less. Even if it was only the 7.7, knowing what actually happens at corporate events, DanTex Feb 2016 #43
Not everyone who has worked in the private sector gets paid 200k to give a speech Bjorn Against Feb 2016 #49
No, but if you're vote most admired woman in America 15 years running, then you do. DanTex Feb 2016 #52
If Michael Moore or Noam Chomsky were running for President that might be an issue Bjorn Against Feb 2016 #57
But if they did, we could count on you to object that their speaking fees have corrupted them. DanTex Feb 2016 #58
You might have a point if I had said that all speaking fees are bad, but I did not say that. Bjorn Against Feb 2016 #62
:) Lucinda Feb 2016 #40
Do tell? Fumesucker Feb 2016 #42
He is entertaining, isn't he? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #44
It's one of the silliest criticism I've seen by Democrats of another Democrat in my life. stevenleser Feb 2016 #46
Get real. It's the number of zeros that is, uh, suspect. Future benefits of an inevitable President libdem4life Feb 2016 #79
Lol, nope, sorry, it's still a silly joke. Nt stevenleser Feb 2016 #94
6 figure fees are not a joke. They are purchased influence. Not silly, either. There is intent. libdem4life Feb 2016 #98
n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #48
Who would of thunk it , Are you in the Used Car business ? orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #51
153 million is obscene NowSam Feb 2016 #53
The speaking fees don't bother me. Chemisse Feb 2016 #54
You damn well KNOW she's beholden to Big Camping!!! Metric System Feb 2016 #55
Hillary is a pawn. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #56
They have nothing else..eom asuhornets Feb 2016 #59
Imagine, if you will, Hillary standing in front of the banksters and Vinca Feb 2016 #60
I'll start with your first example. malokvale77 Feb 2016 #61
If I was a Hillary Clinton supporter Aerows Feb 2016 #64
"...with the outrage and conspiracies..." Wilms Feb 2016 #66
If she was so smart, where was her judgment zalinda Feb 2016 #67
Unless your name is Clinton. They have appeared to be improper for years and have mastered libdem4life Feb 2016 #89
Not conspiracy, but oligarchy. wouldsman Feb 2016 #68
Sanders has changed the race, and many people are still struggling with that concept. LS_Editor Feb 2016 #70
Release the transcripts. Problem solved. Deflect or dodge, doesn't add up to what she has said. highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #71
well of course you are....... LOL bowens43 Feb 2016 #72
Earning a few hundred thousand wouldn't be an issue.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #75
$250 k an hour for a speaking engagement.. And they only made 7.7 million from the banks. raindaddy Feb 2016 #76
The same stuff she told the National Camping Association. DanTex Feb 2016 #78
If she telling the Wall Street banks the same thing she telling the NCA raindaddy Feb 2016 #99
It's kind of like Obama and releasing the birth certificate. Is that really going to matter to DanTex Feb 2016 #100
It's nothing like Obama releasing his birth certificate.... raindaddy Feb 2016 #101
Depends where you stand. The people who really really thought Obama was DanTex Feb 2016 #102
Lame.. The were also people who thought the world was really really flat... raindaddy Feb 2016 #111
Yes, there were. Good point. There were also people who thought that Hillary had DanTex Feb 2016 #113
There are also people that think Wall Street Bank execs paid the Clinton's $7.5 million to ......... raindaddy Feb 2016 #115
You left out the Camping Association. Those are the guys you really need to look out for! DanTex Feb 2016 #116
Not worried about the camping association... raindaddy Feb 2016 #118
Maybe you should be. Those campers can be a crafty bunch! DanTex Feb 2016 #119
No worries, Hillary will march right into their s'more roast and tell em to, "cut it out!!!" raindaddy Feb 2016 #120
I wonder if she talked to Goldman Sachs about..... wolfie001 Feb 2016 #77
The Fragrance Foundation conspiracies just write themselves. The odor of sanctity.... Hekate Feb 2016 #80
I don't like the smell of this... DanTex Feb 2016 #84
lolz Hekate Feb 2016 #86
The National Camping Association was supposed to ensure a tent big enough for the whole Dem Party... Hekate Feb 2016 #96
Dan, with all due respects Glamrock Feb 2016 #109
We can also argue about what "the majority of the population" thinks all day long. DanTex Feb 2016 #110
True, we can Glamrock Feb 2016 #112
Favorability is far from the only category people use to decide on a president. DanTex Feb 2016 #114
Any other year, I'd be in full agreement Dan Glamrock Feb 2016 #117
Its a conspiracy by Big Timeout Iggy Knorr Feb 2016 #123
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm a little disappointed...»Reply #84