Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
7. This comment to the OP link captures our disillusion with the Clintons
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:31 PM
Feb 2016

"eb 24 · 11:59:49 AM
Well Clinton being good on these issues was one of the delusions I had left.

It's not even in trying to find dirt on Clintons that I find things that startle and sadden me about what went on then that I was blissfully unaware of, it's just researching issues.

For instance fights over labeling rBGH in dairy products caught my interest and the Clinton administration's part in the rBGH/Monsanto scam came as a shock...but the pages I went to had other old news that made it all worse. I saved some. For instance from '94:


Last week, the Clinton administration released its proposal for
reforming two of the nation's laws that govern pesticide residues in
food. The proposal would allow a certain amount of pesticide
residues in food products if "a reasonable certainty of no harm"
exists. The proposal covers both raw and processed foods.

The Clinton plan would scrap the Delaney Clause of the 1958 Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act. Delaney said that no known carcinogens
would be allowed in processed foods. The proposal also amends the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).

Neither industry nor public interest groups like the Clinton plan.


"There were so many things like that catching me by surprise a decade later.

But OK so he pushed all these bad things and OK industry matters more than what we put in our bodies...but still thought he was good when it came to pollution and environmental protection. Now POOF goes that.

I was wondering how so many of us had all these fond, warm memories of those years, barring a few major exceptions. I think some of it is what the media covers and the fact that the internet was not what it has become today.

I know about many of bush's really bad moves on the environment or workers protection and so on because of the internet. I made a point of following him from the start to see if I could overcome my aversion to him and grew increasingly horrified by so many of his early actions that never made the news.

If we'd had all this in 1992 we might have had a different view of the Clinton years.

Still I wish my warm fuzzy memories were true. Sometimes reality bites."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

IMO, all Flint is to Hillary is a photo-op and a sound bite. n/t djean111 Feb 2016 #1
Yep.... n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #4
Of course it is! I agree. nt m-lekktor Feb 2016 #5
..+1 840high Feb 2016 #9
Yep. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #12
Correct ! Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #20
Link's actual headline:"Clinton takes a big stinkin' dump on Ohio" Divernan Feb 2016 #2
And here are the details of Hillary's direct involvement in this horror. Divernan Feb 2016 #3
How anyone can defend this is beyond me. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #6
because, outside of the innuendo without any evidence at all bigtree Feb 2016 #15
Not ZERO Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #24
that's pretty goddamn weak bigtree Feb 2016 #25
It was said in Ohio in 2000 that it sunk Gores chances there. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #11
This comment to the OP link captures our disillusion with the Clintons Divernan Feb 2016 #7
The internet... TeeYiYi Feb 2016 #27
Disgusting and typical cali Feb 2016 #8
K & R AzDar Feb 2016 #10
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #13
Bill Clinton bigtree Feb 2016 #14
But they are members of the same club and share the same mindset Armstead Feb 2016 #18
There are at least two inaccuracies in this story dsc Feb 2016 #16
Clinton said it would never be allowed to operate. He lied. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #21
And ... Cluster Bombs Are Not Good for Children, Hillary slipslidingaway Feb 2016 #17
But Albright thinks women who don't support Hillary will have a "special place in hell." Skwmom Feb 2016 #19
And the women in Iraq have less freedom after our invasion ... slipslidingaway Feb 2016 #22
Stunning Fairgo Feb 2016 #23
All East Liverpool's Black residents live near the incinerator. Words fail as to snagglepuss Feb 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A blast from the Clintons...»Reply #7