2016 Postmortem

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)

69. then there will be a mainstream source

Reply to Bubzer (Reply #61)

Mon Feb 8, 2016, 10:25 AM

Feb 2016

video can be edited, so as not to show the whole picture.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We need not honor Republicans by posting their garbage. [View all] rbrnmw Feb 2016 OP

Little problem with this plea. jeff47 Feb 2016 #1

Like what? OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #3

As a very recent example is the push-back against the actual quote jeff47 Feb 2016 #4

I'm not following. OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #5

Which is part of the problem - deliberately ignoring the facts jeff47 Feb 2016 #10

Cake and eat it too rules always apply with that crowd, they get to both say it and not say it. Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #25

What crowd? OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #28

This one? Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #45

A fictional TV show crowd? OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #46

Some admire their school of thought. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #47

I see. OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #51

I like the movie "My Fellow Americans" myself.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #54

Context is critical, of course. OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #26

So you're claiming the listeners should not put together three adjacent sentences jeff47 Feb 2016 #29

Listeners are welcome to do as they please. OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #30

Jejj47 I suggest ONLY honest facts be imported. Hortensis Feb 2016 #70

No "import" required. I supplied an accurate quote. jeff47 Feb 2016 #71

The Ostritch manuver is not wise Plucketeer Feb 2016 #49

Just for clarification, since this wasn't directed at me... OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #52

I was talking about the REPUBLICANS Plucketeer Feb 2016 #55

Okay, thanks. (n/t) OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #58

Did I say everything is a RW smear? rbrnmw Feb 2016 #6

Did I say everything is a RW smear? jeff47 Feb 2016 #15

OK we are cool then rbrnmw Feb 2016 #27

I think readers can tell the difference. cyberswede Feb 2016 #7

Not seeing much evidence of that from many individuals. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #14

I genrally agree... but I think there are also those who will be intellectually dishonest about it. Bubzer Feb 2016 #57

Not on DU they can't. JTFrog Feb 2016 #72

Lay out the facts, then, and not the snotty Repub rhetoric that usually accompanies them. ancianita Feb 2016 #8

Just look above for how that works. jeff47 Feb 2016 #12

Agreed Gothmog Feb 2016 #2

If its the TRUTH, I don't care whether the RW is running w/ it or not. Corruption should be stopped RiverLover Feb 2016 #9

If it's the truth then you should be able to find a non RW source rbrnmw Feb 2016 #17

Most of the shit on Clinton has passed into common knowledge. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #32

The problem I have with this is the notion that dems have a corner on truth. Bubzer Feb 2016 #60

So Clinton praising Kissinger is out now? Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #11

I said neither side should help them rbrnmw Feb 2016 #13

So Kissinger's accolades of Clinton are kool now? Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author Paulie Feb 2016 #23

As long as the source isn't originated from a RW source rbrnmw Feb 2016 #24

Should not be allowed. eom MoonRiver Feb 2016 #16

exactly rbrnmw Feb 2016 #20

And thanks for bringing up the subject! Needs to be talked about a lot more. MoonRiver Feb 2016 #22

What are you talking about - can you be specific? demwing Feb 2016 #18

anything against Bernie or Hillary rbrnmw Feb 2016 #21

And who is the judge, you? Yesterday I was in a thread attacking Bernie using the Chicago Tribune Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #31

I agree with that I don't think attacks against Bernie are fair either. rbrnmw Feb 2016 #37

So no posting of Hillary Clinton's actual record? fbc Feb 2016 #33

then find a main stream source rbrnmw Feb 2016 #34

What if its a video of actual events posted by a RW source? Bubzer Feb 2016 #61

then there will be a mainstream source rbrnmw Feb 2016 #69

Scrolling through the thread, I'm not surprised to see Sanders supporters arguing with the OP. Metric System Feb 2016 #35

+1...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #68

Should we send our posts to you for prior approval before posting them? 99Forever Feb 2016 #36

nope didn't say that at all rbrnmw Feb 2016 #38

Actually you did, just not in so many words. 99Forever Feb 2016 #40

Kick & very highly recommended! William769 Feb 2016 #39

Thank you for posting this swilton Feb 2016 #41

WAIT...this idea smacks of...censorship? maddiemom Feb 2016 #42

It smacks of following the rules on a private discussion board. OilemFirchen Feb 2016 #48

Did you flag it and go through the process? (Just catching up with the week). maddiemom Feb 2016 #74

RW smears about Moslems Bad Dog Feb 2016 #56

K & R Iliyah Feb 2016 #43

True that, because between Hillary and Bernie we have the two best choices. marble falls Feb 2016 #44

we sure do and I don't rbrnmw Feb 2016 #50

Hear hear. I have not seen "gotcha" politics practiced to this extreme betw Dems before - makes me Kashkakat v.2.0 Feb 2016 #53

K&R and a big thank you to the OP! LW1977 Feb 2016 #59

+100000 mcar Feb 2016 #62

K&R! Lisa D Feb 2016 #63

Thanksd for this rbrnmw, I cringe when I see the conservative attacks posted here if they Todays_Illusion Feb 2016 #64

Case in point Bobbie Jo Feb 2016 #65

I have obtained great joy olddots Feb 2016 #66

DU rec...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #67

kicking for exposure rbrnmw Feb 2016 #73