2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bernie Sanders is NOT a Socialist, by ANY definition [View all]
Socialism is defined by the STATE owning the means of production.
That's not what he believes in
Here's what he believes in:
"support for a "universalist" welfare state aimed specifically at enhancing individual autonomy and promoting social mobility; a corporatist system involving a tripartite arrangement where representatives of labor and employers negotiate wages and labor market policy mediated by the government; and a commitment to widespread private ownership, free markets and free trade."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model
That's Bernie.
Socialism on the other hand is this:
"Socialism is a variety of social and economic systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production; as well as the political ideologies, theories, and movements that aim at their establishment. Social ownership may refer to forms of public, cooperative, or collective ownership; to citizen ownership of equity; or to any combination of these. Although there are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them, social ownership is the common element shared by its various forms."
Bernie DOESN'T believe in that.
Social ownership is NOT the same thing as universal healthcare or building roads.
This is from the Wiki page on Social Ownership:
Misuse of the term
See also: Socialized medicine
Particularly in the United States, the term "socialization" has been mistakenly used to refer to any state or government-operated industry or service (the proper term for such being either nationalization or municipalization). It has also been used to mean any tax-funded programs, whether privately run or government run. The term "socialized" is usually used in a pejorative sense, most commonly in reference to publicly funded health care programs.[43]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_ownership#Misuse_of_the_term