Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The end of the Clinton Era RiverLover Feb 2016 #1
I thought 2008 was the end of that. Apparently not. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #24
....but....but....but.... bvar22 Feb 2016 #99
Are you trying to get labeled a Bernie Bro? passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #107
Then the Hillary Campaign and supporters should STFU about it. bvar22 Feb 2016 #111
I call out Hillary supporters all the time for ugly stuff they say passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #112
well if a female uses it PatrynXX Feb 2016 #113
I hope. bigwillq Feb 2016 #134
I watched that interview. tazkcmo Feb 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author CobaltBlue Feb 2016 #9
Not so much what year but tazkcmo Feb 2016 #12
Yes hibbing Feb 2016 #57
They really need to differentiate the amount by city/area. cui bono Feb 2016 #87
Depends on what parts of those cities one is living in Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #125
But even there the rent is going to be much higher than the equivalent in a small town. cui bono Feb 2016 #127
Just like the party thought we would never elect Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #17
Joe Scarborough thought it was 1930s Bolivia jakeXT Feb 2016 #63
Yeah, me too. freedom fighter jh Feb 2016 #11
He could be referring to the sort of apparatchiks that typically populate the WH tblue37 Feb 2016 #70
Excellent Essay Rilgin Feb 2016 #71
This is also an excellent analysis. Honestly, though, I am surprised when anyone actually tblue37 Feb 2016 #72
I never know either. I tend to be long winded as well. Rilgin Feb 2016 #73
Thank you for sharing this with us. Bohunk68 Feb 2016 #77
Thank you. Makes sense. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #86
I think it's much simpler than that. Unknown Beatle Feb 2016 #116
noteworthy essay, tblue37 hopemountain Feb 2016 #128
Mine also. I am solidly behind that "wacky socialist". SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #28
Exactly. jwirr Feb 2016 #43
They didn't LOSE their soul, they SOLD it to the highest bidder. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #3
^^That right there is the entire problem^^ onecaliberal Feb 2016 #26
Indeed....she sold out after Bill, and Chelsea in training has been hard to watch. ViseGrip Feb 2016 #52
I wish them well, and I wish them to just go away. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #54
Willing at that. SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #30
But the Clintons were dead broke and in debt after leaving the White House. Ikonoklast Feb 2016 #88
They didn't have one to lose cali Feb 2016 #4
BINGO! in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #13
Exactly where my mind went. Glad I didn't have to say it. Bubzer Feb 2016 #34
Hillary has all of Bills liabilities, none of his political skills, and the charm of a rattlesnake.. Indepatriot Feb 2016 #5
i have to disagree.... restorefreedom Feb 2016 #20
100% accurate. hifiguy Feb 2016 #44
That sure sums her up farleftlib Feb 2016 #49
..+1 840high Feb 2016 #85
You hit the nail Carolina Feb 2016 #114
more like a scorpion hopemountain Feb 2016 #129
Way to help the Republicans HelenWheels Feb 2016 #132
Thanks for your concern. I am a 54 year-old who hasn't missed an election since 1980. Indepatriot Feb 2016 #138
They revealed their soul Fumesucker Feb 2016 #6
Read between the lines... demwing Feb 2016 #7
Because they're afraid she'll lose the GE. Many of us have the same fear. SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #32
Yup that's my point exactly nt demwing Feb 2016 #48
That is what I have always thought. malokvale77 Feb 2016 #69
Exactly. If she wins, we lose the general. backscatter712 Feb 2016 #133
They do not do strategy, only tactics / FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #8
It does seem like they're reacting, not acting. malthaussen Feb 2016 #61
Panic! Helen Borg Feb 2016 #10
Political mortality they fear the most, IMO. Maybe just short of political irrelevance. libdem4life Feb 2016 #31
You know, I think you have articulated something I've been feeling Nay Feb 2016 #47
I know, ive been thinking cilla4progress Feb 2016 #50
I totally agree with you. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #93
Did it actually have one to begin with? GoneOffShore Feb 2016 #14
That's what I was wondering n/t MissDeeds Feb 2016 #51
^ Yup, this ^ Myrina Feb 2016 #55
The Coronation Express has no wheels. 99Forever Feb 2016 #15
Hillary Clinton has the campaign instincts of Michael Dukakis Larkspur Feb 2016 #16
she's 'nixon' in a dress roguevalley Feb 2016 #36
I've been saying that for years hifiguy Feb 2016 #42
Nixon was elected President twice. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #78
That made him no less of a criminal, sleazy, hifiguy Feb 2016 #95
Nailed it! eom Ligyron Feb 2016 #59
Do you mean a pantsuit? begin_within Feb 2016 #106
:D roguevalley Feb 2016 #108
That's ridiculous. She's Nixon in a pantsuit. hedda_foil Feb 2016 #121
Lotta silly hyperbole in that OP... Orsino Feb 2016 #18
The campaign can't turn to substance Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #84
I dunno. Americans seem to like the idea of modest reform... Orsino Feb 2016 #137
She was done after Iowa and nobody told her. Now she's burned to a crisp and KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #19
ouch. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #21
Sanders campaign's revolutionaries are losing their cool bigtree Feb 2016 #22
Yipes. You really should read the piece in its entiety on Kos. It is a damning KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #23
oh, bullhockey bigtree Feb 2016 #25
Now there's a rational,logical, well thought reply which adds to the discourse. dixiegrrrrl Feb 2016 #29
Wasn't though. SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #37
the article lumped in all of the little campaign nonsense together bigtree Feb 2016 #41
I think "There's a special place in Hell..." malthaussen Feb 2016 #62
Albright said that bigtree Feb 2016 #64
Oh, now you're just being disengenuous. malthaussen Feb 2016 #65
whatever bigtree Feb 2016 #68
And yet in your previous comments above you said this pinebox Feb 2016 #80
Yes she did Go Vols Feb 2016 #102
Well she showed extremely poor judgement by making such Karma13612 Feb 2016 #110
No, Hillary is playing dirty politics just as she did in 2008. cui bono Feb 2016 #90
remember, Obama chose her for one of his top cabinet positions bigtree Feb 2016 #96
How does that change her current behavior being identical to the 2008 campaign? cui bono Feb 2016 #97
first of all, that's your own narrative to defend bigtree Feb 2016 #98
So why did you bring up Obama appointing her? cui bono Feb 2016 #105
After he stripped it of its most important duties. ieoeja Feb 2016 #104
as a community organizer from hopemountain Feb 2016 #130
Speaking FACTUALLY about Sanders isn't "muck" no matter how Sanders supporters swarm the internet. KittyWampus Feb 2016 #35
that sword cuts both ways and be and hrc roguevalley Feb 2016 #39
But speaking FACTUALLY about Clinton is? Only to be expected from the Clintonistas. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #56
You really want to go down that road because Hillary is a pro mud bogger pinebox Feb 2016 #81
When will she start speaking factually about Sanders? Because she's not so far. n/t cui bono Feb 2016 #91
LOL, getting scared too i see!!!! Logical Feb 2016 #136
As I Have Been Saying All Along scottie55 Feb 2016 #27
She has been appointed (assumes annointment) for two of her three political positions. libdem4life Feb 2016 #38
This^^^^^Indeed.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #122
Just felt shady...ditto to 2nd paragraph...and she did not Accomplish Anything, so they say. n/t libdem4life Feb 2016 #139
^^^ This ^^^ cantbeserious Feb 2016 #46
2nd time around & she can't manage her campaign successfully again & you want to hand her Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #33
Exactly right MissDeeds Feb 2016 #53
the campaign was PERFECT! it's not her fault the voters didn't respond! MisterP Feb 2016 #124
It's what the Clintons are. hifiguy Feb 2016 #40
The Establishment Is Apoplectic About Bernie - No Tactic Is Too Low Or Malicious cantbeserious Feb 2016 #45
Rocky Balboa november3rd Feb 2016 #58
Bernie's Strategy is speaking truth to power NowSam Feb 2016 #60
They'll end up paying a price... raindaddy Feb 2016 #66
agree Go Vols Feb 2016 #103
I hate to say it... WiffenPoof Feb 2016 #67
That “artful smear” line was obviously rehearsed as she had no followup.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #74
They kept Big Dog zentrum Feb 2016 #75
I remember watching that part of the debate TheFarseer Feb 2016 #76
Now, you’ve got a situation with these transcripts a little like Richard Nixon and his tapes... AlbertCat Feb 2016 #79
All the Nixon references are hilarious! I get why Bernstein does it, but am astounded bettyellen Feb 2016 #89
Perhaps its because Hillary is referencing Kissinger. Rilgin Feb 2016 #118
OMG- she IS Nixon!! LOL. bettyellen Feb 2016 #119
Can't lose what you don't have. I believe it was sold to the oligarchy so that... Ivan Kaputski Feb 2016 #82
The Clinton's have been doing an excellent job. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #83
I see what you did there. GreatGazoo Feb 2016 #92
Reading the DailyKos is to the Left what reading Free Republic is to the Right. Beacool Feb 2016 #94
Is this a joke? noiretextatique Feb 2016 #126
Everytime I hear someone refer to Sanders or his campaign as the extreme left... white_wolf Feb 2016 #131
What caught my eye was "she could blow the Democrats’ chance for the White House…" robbob Feb 2016 #100
PheWWW! And I was about to blame it on a Labrador retriever. Eleanors38 Feb 2016 #101
OMG...Nixon! SoapBox Feb 2016 #109
Expect it to get much worse before it dies off and goes away Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #115
Sorry....but, it was an "artful TRUTH"..... mudstump Feb 2016 #117
Their hubris was their downfall. They took the win for granted for too long. rhett o rick Feb 2016 #120
I'm sure, when the speeches are released ... nikto Feb 2016 #123
would that the S'mores recipe that uses burnt peeps? azurnoir Feb 2016 #135
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"...The Clinton campaign,...»Reply #92