Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Hold on Rachel [View all]

Uncle Joe

(58,362 posts)
34. More Republicans voted in New Hampshire than Democrats and I've posted this before but I will post
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:47 AM
Feb 2016

it again.

You can thank Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the corporate media conglomerates for that in

trying their best to stifle Bernie's message from reaching the people.



CAMPAIGN 2016 COVERAGE: ANNUAL TOTALS FOR 2015 1. During 2015, Campaign 2016 logged more than 17 hours of coverage on the broadcast networks' weekday nightly newscasts (ABC, CBS and NBC combined).

2. The annual total of 1031 minutes is higher than any other penultimate year of the last seven Presidential campaigns, except for 2007 (1991 = 146; 1995 = 294; 1999 = 339; 2003 = 167; 2007 = 1072; 2011 = 790).

(snip)

4. The Republican race is more than twice as newsworthy than the Democratic race (701 mins vs 248 -- with 82 mins of coverage with no partisan focus). Besides the fact that there are many more Republican candidates than Democratic ones, the GOP debates have made much more news than the Democrats' (123 mins vs 25).

5. Donald Trump is by far the most newsworthy storyline of Campaign 2016, alone accounting for almost a third of all coverage (327 mins or 32%), more than the entire Democratic contest combined. The other GOP candidates, in order of prominence, were Jeb Bush (57 mins), Ben Carson (57), Marco Rubio (22).

6. Hillary Rodham Clinton has been the second most newsworthy candidate (121 mins), with an additional 88 mins devoted to the controversy over her e-mails as Secretary of State and 29 mins to the investigations into the Benghazi Consulate attack. The second most newsworthy Democrat was a non-candidate: 73 mins on Joe Biden's decision not to run.

7. Noticeably under-covered have been the current second-placed candidate in each party's national opinion polls: Ted Cruz has attracted only 21 mins, Bernie Sanders only 20 mins.


http://tyndallreport.com/





WASHINGTON – Sen. Bernie Sanders has made big gains in Iowa, leads most New Hampshire polls and fares better than Hillary Clinton in general election matchups against Donald Trump and other Republican White House hopefuls.

But the insurgent campaign that has drawn the biggest crowds on the presidential campaign trail has been all but ignored on the flagship television network newscasts, according to Tyndall Report, which tracks nightly news coverage by NBC, CBS and ABC.

“The corporately-owned media may not like Bernie’s anti-establishment views but for the sake of American democracy they must allow for a fair debate in this presidential campaign,” said Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ campaign manager. “Bernie must receive the same level of coverage on the nightly news as other leading candidates.”

ABC’s “World News Tonight” has devoted 81 minutes to Donald Trump’s campaign so far this year compared to a mere 20 seconds on Sanders through the end of November. NBC’s “Nightly News” afforded 2.9 minutes of coverage to Sanders since January. The “CBS Evening News” provided viewers 6.4 minutes of coverage on the Vermont senator.

“The network newscasts are wildly overplaying Trump, who regularly attracts between 20-30 percent of primary voter support, while at the same time wildly underplaying Sanders, who regularly attracts between 20-30 percent of primary voter support,” according to a report Friday by the journalism watchdog group Media Matters for America analyzing the Tyndall report data.

Media Matters called the lack of coverage of Sanders a “rather stunning revelation.”

https://berniesanders.com/press-release/why-the-bernie-blackout-on-corporate-network-news/



Bernie's biggest challenge has been name recognition, Schultz and the corporate media conglomerates knew this.



There is still a wide gap between the two in name recognition nationally. Nearly a quarter of Democrats and two-fifths of Independents say they are still not that familiar with Sanders. In comparison, Clinton has almost total name recognition among voters.


http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-presidential-hopefuls-sanders-clinton-dead-heat-reuters-133828882.html



Schultz only added debates at the last minute after realizing that Bernie was becoming competitive in Iowa, leading by double digits in New Hampshire and beginning to attract more minority support.

In the meantime, the Republicans with their superior number of debates ruled the airwaves and were allowed to set the frame.

Bernie has done remarkably well despite this blackout and mismanagement of the Democratic debates.

I believe that Bernie decidedly winning in New Hampshire and finally having more Democratic Debates will only improve excitement nationwide as his message reaches the people and more people come to know him.

Thanks for the thread, angrychair.
Hold on Rachel [View all] angrychair Feb 2016 OP
Not Bernies fault that... Armymedic88 Feb 2016 #1
exactly....he did his part virtualobserver Feb 2016 #2
Yup..hee. nt artislife Feb 2016 #23
The drop in turnout was solely because Hillary failed to turn out the vote for herself. Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #3
True. Rachel will NOT say that though, she's not allowed. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #4
She sold her soul. Done watching as of two days ago. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #6
Hillary interview? Yes, me too. n/t Avalux Feb 2016 #7
Yes, the second one in four days. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #9
+1 berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #26
same here 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #41
Rachel turned the corner awhile back I could see it coming when glinda Feb 2016 #5
Same here MissDeeds Feb 2016 #16
Oddly, what turned me off to Rachel Joe Shlabotnik Feb 2016 #20
Rachel is so in the tank for Hillary INdemo Feb 2016 #8
She didn't win because she is a terrible candidate. TPTB nominate her at all of our risk eon mikehiggins Feb 2016 #11
And David slew Goliath with a sling and a stone... John Poet Feb 2016 #15
I'm sure it was orders from the MSNBC, chiefs or MAYBE the NBC chiefs. napi21 Feb 2016 #17
And that's the power of money. Gregorian Feb 2016 #10
that is not what rachel is saying mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #12
What??? angrychair Feb 2016 #13
you are not from NH are you? ;) mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #14
um. amborin Feb 2016 #21
Please Explain In Detail How You Came To That Conclusion.....nt global1 Feb 2016 #18
that you are not from nh? mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #19
That you are a Clinton supporter? Zorra Feb 2016 #24
Women are bad at math. Kurovski Feb 2016 #22
She likes the millions she's paid and needs to rationalize toeing the corp line. Skwmom Feb 2016 #25
She's a Comcaster. nt valerief Feb 2016 #27
+10 nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #30
And Rachel Is Almost As Good As They Get Corporate Wise scottie55 Feb 2016 #28
Rachel on AAR was fucking awesome! Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #29
I hope you send that to her. It's an important point. Armstead Feb 2016 #31
I was puzzling over that Rachael segment myself 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #32
She's not lying. world wide wally Feb 2016 #33
A Lot Of It Is The Anti Obama Vote scottie55 Feb 2016 #35
I get the math angrychair Feb 2016 #36
That's a good post, angrychair. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #39
More Republicans voted in New Hampshire than Democrats and I've posted this before but I will post Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #34
I don't disagree at all angrychair Feb 2016 #37
I agree, it wasn't a record breaking turnout but it was in the top tier as for overall numbers, Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #38
Bernie got more votes than any candidate ever! Bernblu Feb 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hold on Rachel»Reply #34