Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
3. Also, the overhead for Medicare for All would be much less than with insurers...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

And that's because there would be no stockholder dividends and executive pay.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders’ Medicare for All...»Reply #3