Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Capehart removes the picture of "Not Bernie" from his twitter page, replaces it with lawn sign [View all]Iggy Knorr
(247 posts)14. He's an biased, trolling asshole who should be fired
"Spent the day doing my job. Reporting. Getting the facts. Thinking before writing. New Bernie photo piece coming soon. Not so cut and dry."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Capehart removes the picture of "Not Bernie" from his twitter page, replaces it with lawn sign [View all]
Electric Monk
Feb 2016
OP
Less than a year since Capehart was forced by public outrage to apologize for his Ferguson piece
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#62
He's clickbait backbiting, not even clickbait journalism. He did not even pick up the phone to ask
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#71
If that's the standard, there are an awful lot of DUers who never bothered to admit
mythology
Feb 2016
#72
Fact is the standard for 'journalist doing journalism' is much higher than for random idiots on the
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#73
I don't expect an apology. "It's confusing as to who to believe" will be the extent
valerief
Feb 2016
#76
It's kinda cute actually. Instead of "not Bernie" he's admitting with the sign that "it's Bernie".
JimDandy
Feb 2016
#59
He may come up with more insightful pieces if he is high. As it is, his column is garbage.
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#37
Skinner started a thread yesterday. I think that's part of the reason it's been such a big deal here
Electric Monk
Feb 2016
#46
It's still got the headline "this is not Bernie Sanders" so it seems he's trying to be coy.
cui bono
Feb 2016
#11
Coy is a good word for it. I agree that this seems like a non-apology apology.
Electric Monk
Feb 2016
#12
He should have done his job and gotten the facts before blabbing all over the MSM and
Luminous Animal
Feb 2016
#19
He had a deadline, Clinton's needed the script today, to coordinated with Lewis and Brock.
HooptieWagon
Feb 2016
#32
Exactly. Not to mention defense against the recent endorsements and the Erica Garner ad.
arcane1
Feb 2016
#49
i don't either. It is now 9 hours since he interviewed the photographer.
Luminous Animal
Feb 2016
#25
What's wrong with the intercept? I feel I am not understanding this conversation.
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#41
the opinion pieces don't promote a "pro billionare" stance despite the ownership.
m-lekktor
Feb 2016
#65
I'm going with editor in chief. That is the journalistic standard. You have a problem with
Luminous Animal
Feb 2016
#53
So many people called him a "hack" that he's going to be another Armstrong Williams.
Spitfire of ATJ
Feb 2016
#52
I hope Jon does not do everything backwards like he reports first and researches second....
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#63
"Where the youthful Civil-Rights activism of Bernie Sanders and Bruce Rappaport collide."
Ino
Feb 2016
#68