Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Capehart removes the picture of "Not Bernie" from his twitter page, replaces it with lawn sign [View all]Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)34. Who runs it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Capehart removes the picture of "Not Bernie" from his twitter page, replaces it with lawn sign [View all]
Electric Monk
Feb 2016
OP
Less than a year since Capehart was forced by public outrage to apologize for his Ferguson piece
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#62
He's clickbait backbiting, not even clickbait journalism. He did not even pick up the phone to ask
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#71
If that's the standard, there are an awful lot of DUers who never bothered to admit
mythology
Feb 2016
#72
Fact is the standard for 'journalist doing journalism' is much higher than for random idiots on the
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#73
I don't expect an apology. "It's confusing as to who to believe" will be the extent
valerief
Feb 2016
#76
It's kinda cute actually. Instead of "not Bernie" he's admitting with the sign that "it's Bernie".
JimDandy
Feb 2016
#59
He may come up with more insightful pieces if he is high. As it is, his column is garbage.
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#37
Skinner started a thread yesterday. I think that's part of the reason it's been such a big deal here
Electric Monk
Feb 2016
#46
It's still got the headline "this is not Bernie Sanders" so it seems he's trying to be coy.
cui bono
Feb 2016
#11
Coy is a good word for it. I agree that this seems like a non-apology apology.
Electric Monk
Feb 2016
#12
He should have done his job and gotten the facts before blabbing all over the MSM and
Luminous Animal
Feb 2016
#19
He had a deadline, Clinton's needed the script today, to coordinated with Lewis and Brock.
HooptieWagon
Feb 2016
#32
Exactly. Not to mention defense against the recent endorsements and the Erica Garner ad.
arcane1
Feb 2016
#49
i don't either. It is now 9 hours since he interviewed the photographer.
Luminous Animal
Feb 2016
#25
What's wrong with the intercept? I feel I am not understanding this conversation.
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#41
the opinion pieces don't promote a "pro billionare" stance despite the ownership.
m-lekktor
Feb 2016
#65
I'm going with editor in chief. That is the journalistic standard. You have a problem with
Luminous Animal
Feb 2016
#53
So many people called him a "hack" that he's going to be another Armstrong Williams.
Spitfire of ATJ
Feb 2016
#52
I hope Jon does not do everything backwards like he reports first and researches second....
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#63
"Where the youthful Civil-Rights activism of Bernie Sanders and Bruce Rappaport collide."
Ino
Feb 2016
#68