Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's why I support Bernie. He's not an asshole. AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #1
Now there's a campaign slogan! cali Feb 2016 #6
an increasingly rare commodity in politics nowadays it seems AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #16
That's exactly what I was thinking. Enthusiast Feb 2016 #134
+1 mmonk Feb 2016 #181
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #33
Yep MissDeeds Feb 2016 #35
Perfect. 840high Feb 2016 #50
... LittleBlue Feb 2016 #66
Succinct malthaussen Feb 2016 #183
Papoon for president DBoon Feb 2016 #195
This!^^^^^^10000! 2banon Feb 2016 #199
Not only is he not an asshole madokie Feb 2016 #209
Times like this EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #2
The Clinton camp is so desperate - they look really stupid! Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #151
Might not have been HRC camp, plausible deniability and all. Octafish Feb 2016 #197
Gives both rats and fucking a bad name Fumesucker Feb 2016 #3
It can no longer be tolerated. Volaris Feb 2016 #180
Glad you turned this into its own thread mainer Feb 2016 #4
+1 dreamnightwind Feb 2016 #12
+1 Email Kittycat Feb 2016 #85
Hear hear dorkzilla Feb 2016 #92
Sally Cook... ksc Feb 2016 #193
"So what made it so important to her that she felt she needed to change the caption ?" TubbersUK Feb 2016 #5
Was the archive label actually changed? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #11
I believe so. TubbersUK Feb 2016 #17
That's some premeditated actions there Lordquinton Feb 2016 #18
Yep. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #87
It's all Hillary. Unknown Beatle Feb 2016 #107
Now I'm reading that it doesn't matter either way Lordquinton Feb 2016 #123
Or Stalinism. cprise Feb 2016 #109
The vanishing Commissars. Lordquinton Feb 2016 #125
Didn't he airbrush Trotsky out of photos? white_wolf Feb 2016 #169
He airbrushed many people out of photographs. malthaussen Feb 2016 #185
Funny you said that because this reminds me of the Dan Rather thing marlakay Feb 2016 #113
Remember how Rove spent millions in his crossroads pac? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #127
It's all about trust UglyGreed Feb 2016 #7
It's already backfiring, chervilant Feb 2016 #13
Yep, it was coordinated by the Clinton campaign. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #8
Not only are they crooked and creepy they're plain stupid.. Fumesucker Feb 2016 #21
and she wants us to let her decide about going to war? geesh questionseverything Feb 2016 #78
They are incredibly short-sighted, too. Arugula Latte Feb 2016 #83
A symptom of Republicanism. -none Feb 2016 #189
The ineptitude astonishes me. malthaussen Feb 2016 #187
This^^^^^ LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #79
Awesome and on point analysis! Bravo! wavesofeuphoria Feb 2016 #120
Thanks!! LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #147
They're just wildly throwing crap at the walls now to see what sticks Lorien Feb 2016 #174
Well Said! 2banon Feb 2016 #201
Mind-boggling, isn't it? Punkingal Feb 2016 #9
It is super odd, isn't it? How all the pieces came magically together during oppo-research time, TwilightGardener Feb 2016 #10
Part of me wants Bernie to take off the kid gloves farleftlib Feb 2016 #14
If I was the candidate I'd let social media take off the kid gloves while I remained serene. Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #25
I like it farleftlib Feb 2016 #49
Thoughts Glamrock Feb 2016 #167
K&R! Katashi_itto Feb 2016 #15
Isn't everyone sick of the dirty tricks kind of politics? dragonfly301 Feb 2016 #19
Two Rats copulating FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #20
Someone needs to send Capehart a photo of Hillary opposing his right to marry that handsome Italian Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #22
LOL. nt mhatrw Feb 2016 #28
OH, THAT is good. That is really good. pangaia Feb 2016 #62
Blammo. hifiguy Feb 2016 #63
Oh damn! frylock Feb 2016 #65
Oh snap! farleftlib Feb 2016 #67
K/R!!! LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #73
. MerryBlooms Feb 2016 #76
for some reason Gay Men seem to be her biggest defenders and most passionate in it also JI7 Feb 2016 #96
I don't get it either. My lesbian friends all love Bernie, without exception Lorien Feb 2016 #98
That's nothing new. The ones that are all Tiger Beat-squealy about Hillary really can't Gene Debs Feb 2016 #170
I keep asking them for specifics. They give me a handful of easily debunked Lorien Feb 2016 #175
'Tiger Beat-squealy' LOL navarth Feb 2016 #207
Ouch! SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #110
*SNORT* klook Feb 2016 #133
You think the Clinton campaign is really worried... brooklynite Feb 2016 #23
I think it's about attacking his integrity bbmykel Feb 2016 #32
^Bingo^ nt SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #52
What ewe sed ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #72
The issue is not the photo. The issue is the ratfucking. mhatrw Feb 2016 #36
Thank you for changing "hero" to "activist" nt Empowerer Feb 2016 #41
Not to mention the extremes they went to, even having the photo caption tblue37 Feb 2016 #155
Yes, Mr Insider, I do believe the Clinton campaign is worried... mak3cats Feb 2016 #38
If she isn't, why is her campaign attacking his integrity about it? OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #58
Her "campaign" hasn't. Time did. Amimnoch Feb 2016 #116
Don't insult our intelligence. Who do you think handed Time's Clinton pool reporter this ratfucking? mhatrw Feb 2016 #131
... OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #135
I suppose you have never heard of politicians and officeholders practicing "deniability." nt tblue37 Feb 2016 #156
sweep it under the rug, eh? paleotn Feb 2016 #61
Yes, when the stink gets flung back on their candidate JimDandy Feb 2016 #115
I think you're scared your candidate is losing. You have every right to be scared. Fearless Feb 2016 #90
It's about smearing and attacking the integrity of a man's reputation and life's work. myrna minx Feb 2016 #91
Of course HRC supporters aren't worried. Ned Flanders Feb 2016 #104
NOT "might". Matariki Feb 2016 #220
This Sounds Like The Work of.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #24
...! Recommend for those who didn't know and those who need to be refreshed KoKo Feb 2016 #203
Jonathan Capehart is doing some checking apparently TubbersUK Feb 2016 #26
If the WaPo had an ounce of integrity, he would already be fired for his active participation mhatrw Feb 2016 #29
He's Probably.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #30
This is the WaPo we're talking about. He'll get a promotion and a bonus. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #44
He failed in the most important aspect of journalism... TTUBatfan2008 Feb 2016 #45
The post is still up, no corrections. OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #59
I expected the sink, I didn't expect it to be full of shit. Warren Stupidity Feb 2016 #27
I did me b zola Feb 2016 #51
Given the staggering amount of money at stake for the oligarchy - this is no surprise GeoWilliam750 Feb 2016 #69
this act has now made me a JEB! guy Botany Feb 2016 #31
They Threw Shit At The Bus.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #37
Just last night I met a friend who used to be republican and he is now for Bernie .... Botany Feb 2016 #53
Utter Pieces of Shit jberryhill Feb 2016 #34
Alerters are gonna alert: Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #124
I feel as though I missed out on the beginning of all of this renate Feb 2016 #39
I think this is the gist of it with the added ms liberty Feb 2016 #81
The photo wasn't from Time. jeff47 Feb 2016 #84
thank you! (and thanks to msliberty, too!) renate Feb 2016 #88
It is not immaterial. Bernie apparently had the photo on his website. JimDandy Feb 2016 #128
you're right. "immaterial" wasn't the right word renate Feb 2016 #158
Even if she thought it was not Sanders, what in the world motivated her to petition mhatrw Feb 2016 #129
center piece from Time's article was a direct quote from a Sanders spokesperson. Amimnoch Feb 2016 #118
Nobody is 100% of anything. mhatrw Feb 2016 #130
I agree with what you said at the end there, except the "happily" part corkhead Feb 2016 #192
Contact the Ombudsman! Iggy Knorr Feb 2016 #40
Despicable and Rovian EndElectoral Feb 2016 #42
Brockian jfern Feb 2016 #111
That anybody would diminish the lifelong activism of another me b zola Feb 2016 #43
From what I know so far, SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #57
The timing of it all, combined with the Lewis comments and what's directly ahead says everything. nt polly7 Feb 2016 #190
+1000 Mabus Feb 2016 #212
Disappointing. If you don't have much to run on, except fear, then you've got to tear down. highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #46
The sleaze-o-meter now reads a Mega-Nixon. nt hifiguy Feb 2016 #47
+1 OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #60
Clinton ratfucking it is. More Clinton dirty tricks. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #48
She and her bosses and minions are amoral. elehhhhna Feb 2016 #54
disgusting. she has no principles at all. those who still support her are just as Doctor_J Feb 2016 #55
NO MORE CLINTONS! SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #114
Those details are incredibly slimy. PufPuf23 Feb 2016 #56
Hillary's dirty tricks she'll use to explain how sending your job to Asia is actually going to whereisjustice Feb 2016 #64
This shit is what David Brock used to do for the right wing. CanonRay Feb 2016 #68
Spot on nashville_brook Feb 2016 #191
K&R valerief Feb 2016 #70
excellent review of the situation grasswire Feb 2016 #71
Do Hillary supporters here have no shame? libtodeath Feb 2016 #74
Are there polar bears in Antartica? hifiguy Feb 2016 #89
I characterize this as "sleazy politics". Duval Feb 2016 #75
Lack of judgment Carolina Feb 2016 #102
OK I usually don't post a lot but... StoneCarver Feb 2016 #77
Thats how I feel sad to see black leaders doing this type of stuff marlakay Feb 2016 #119
Fuck Capehart... SoapBox Feb 2016 #80
Never realized til today, but check out his twitter stream Iggy Knorr Feb 2016 #105
"Ratfuckery" is the nonsense you just wrote. Beacool Feb 2016 #82
And John Lewis... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #93
I don't know. People should ask Rep. Lewis those questions. Beacool Feb 2016 #94
Maybe Lewis.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #95
Pot meet Kettle Perogie Feb 2016 #100
Why was one of Sanders' surrogates even being asked such a demeaning question? mhatrw Feb 2016 #121
Jeff Weaver.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #86
Please make this an OP (if someone hasn't already) Autumn Colors Feb 2016 #99
Will do!!! LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #101
The Post Is Up.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #106
Hillary is doing a great job Pakid Feb 2016 #97
Her political instincts are crap Lorien Feb 2016 #103
She seems to think she is more clever than she actually is. These things blow back on her a lot. GoneFishin Feb 2016 #145
The poster children for the Dunning-Kruger effect Lorien Feb 2016 #148
I had to Wiki it. Very interesting. GoneFishin Feb 2016 #182
Not only that, but one of her most consistent attributes is her staggering inability to Gene Debs Feb 2016 #171
So true. That's another reason why the prospect of her in the White House Lorien Feb 2016 #173
the stupid, forgetful, and easy-to-manipulate voting block... tomp Feb 2016 #178
Psychologist Jonathan Haidt importantly notes: If you really want to believe in something, then you Akamai Feb 2016 #108
or believe in NOTHING and mask that little detail with lots of screaming and mudslinging MisterP Feb 2016 #202
good points! Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #217
lol Dem2 Feb 2016 #112
LOL. So it is fragile to fight back? mhatrw Feb 2016 #126
Your enemies aren't here Dem2 Feb 2016 #132
My enemies are indeed here. They are the paid political operatives. mhatrw Feb 2016 #136
Uhm, OK then Dem2 Feb 2016 #140
No effect at all. Full ratfucking ahead. nt mhatrw Feb 2016 #142
ratfucking is the hot word of the day on DU Dem2 Feb 2016 #144
Name them. n/t NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #141
I don't know their names. mhatrw Feb 2016 #143
You know their user names. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #150
That's an absurd demand, because you know directly accusing a specific DUer would get him tblue37 Feb 2016 #159
Yes, it was an absurd demand ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #164
This is the definition of trolling Z_California Feb 2016 #161
Are Hillary supporters fragile when they defend Hillary? liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #166
Excellent OP, while raising some most astute questions. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #117
LOL! Well put. jalan48 Feb 2016 #122
They're getting desperate blondie58 Feb 2016 #137
K&R! This post received hundreds of recommendations! Yay! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #138
The opposition tried to smear him Aerows Feb 2016 #139
what a strain MFM008 Feb 2016 #146
Please educate us to the mechanism concreteblue Feb 2016 #149
are you voting for the nominee? MFM008 Feb 2016 #213
Probably concreteblue Feb 2016 #218
Its a damning sequence of events Fairgo Feb 2016 #152
Step away slow like.... Horus T Light Feb 2016 #153
Yes, it was all my beers that resulted in the Clinton campaign ratfucking the Sanders campaign. mhatrw Feb 2016 #157
Ratfuck, gaslight, repeat Wig Master Feb 2016 #204
Kick historylovr Feb 2016 #154
Wow, Clinton's power truly is awesome. BainsBane Feb 2016 #160
So, can you tell us concreteblue Feb 2016 #162
Why is it that no Clinton supporters have attempted to answer a single question asked in the OP? mhatrw Feb 2016 #163
You nailed them mhatrw Lorien Feb 2016 #176
Two words, Smear Monger, would be future Global Propagandist to replace Murdoch, DAVID BROCK! sabrina 1 Feb 2016 #165
It`s about the coronation. democrank Feb 2016 #168
the original photo caption should be restored. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #172
After the shit she pulled in 2008, this doesn't surprise me at all davidpdx Feb 2016 #177
Oh horseshit! leftofcool Feb 2016 #179
And I do agree that this whole mess is horseshit. But it's what's to be expected from rhett o rick Feb 2016 #186
It's this kind of hyperbolic screeching that ensures that Sanders supporters on DU... randome Feb 2016 #184
Who did the deed? What was the motivation of each individual actor? mhatrw Feb 2016 #194
Jesus, DU hangs Cornell around Bernie's neck as if Cornell was a human turd. Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #215
K&R Red Oak Feb 2016 #188
TIME magazine and WaPo were part of a conspiracy? Octafish Feb 2016 #196
What the hell then are the Clinton going to pull off an October Surprise? avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #198
We have front row seats for how well accountability worls in the media Babel_17 Feb 2016 #200
And who the hell is Sally Cook? Merryland Feb 2016 #205
The is no place for integrity or honesty in the Clinton campaign. 99Forever Feb 2016 #206
Archives Corrected on University of Chicago site ksc Feb 2016 #208
Shame on you for such language ... depths of depravity NotHardly Feb 2016 #210
Attempting to censor the expression of others is just more ratfuckery. Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #214
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Feb 2016 #211
good post-- truly despicable stuff Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #216
. mhatrw Feb 2016 #219
Why would an entire campaign risk so much for something so easily debunked down the line? blm Feb 2016 #221
They are, if you'll pardon the expression, sucking fumes Fumesucker Feb 2016 #222
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The depths of Hillary's P...»Reply #216