2016 Postmortem

arcane1

(38,613 posts)

126. Indeed! n/t

Reply to Le Taz Hot (Reply #87)

Sun Feb 14, 2016, 09:54 PM

Feb 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

135 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

so bernie does interview on a channel hillary is afraid to go on and is criticized? [View all] restorefreedom Feb 2016 OP

"Flame on".... Agschmid Feb 2016 #1

i am realistic about the dissatisfaction this opinion will cause to some. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #5

OKAY, what is THIS one about? Obviously something is Hortensis Feb 2016 #29

he was on fox news sunday with chris wallace restorefreedom Feb 2016 #36

a president doesn't have the luxury to act on their prejudices and write off a large portion roguevalley Feb 2016 #129

great point. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #134

K&R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #2

yes, and he has it big time. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #6

Yes, HE understands that criticism Hortensis Feb 2016 #33

he dared to speak with chris wallace of fox. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #38

Just read the transcript and Wallace is Hortensis Feb 2016 #50

i would guess that his goal was, as it always is, restorefreedom Feb 2016 #52

Agree, although getting his message out to Hortensis Feb 2016 #68

seems to be the case Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #3

i really can't imagine him being unwiling to engage someone with an idea. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #7

Except Henry Kissinger. boston bean Feb 2016 #17

Why would he want to engage with a war criminal? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #18

Is that what I said? boston bean Feb 2016 #19

You brought him up in the context of engagement. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #20

You think?? boston bean Feb 2016 #22

I'm asking what you think, should he consult a war criminal? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #23

My comment is pretty clear. boston bean Feb 2016 #24

Clear as mud but I understand why you're not willing to comment on Kissinger. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #25

LOL. boston bean Feb 2016 #27

I didn't really get it. polly7 Feb 2016 #35

Glad it's not just me! beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #37

me three grasswire Feb 2016 #74

Kissinger has an idea? polly7 Feb 2016 #31

lol. but my guess is he would listen to what he had to say. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #32

Sounds reasonable. Thanks for the response. boston bean Feb 2016 #69

namaste.. :) nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #70

He said he wouldn't look to Kissinger for advice. I bet he'd happily engage him. Jim Lane Feb 2016 #75

The Hillary camp is in full panic mode. TDale313 Feb 2016 #4

yes, distasteful and desperate at the same time nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #8

I admit to being torn about what our politicians should do in regards to FOX dsc Feb 2016 #9

there are actually people who watch fox that might surprise you restorefreedom Feb 2016 #10

Time fore Steve Lesser to go under the bus. He loves FOX /nt Dragonfli Feb 2016 #12

In real time I had some issue with him being on FOX dsc Feb 2016 #16

You don't break a bubble by hiding from it. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #14

THIS nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #41

Most of them seem to go on at some point. Obama did that Superbowl 2014 m-lekktor Feb 2016 #21

Yea deathrind Feb 2016 #44

Poor Steve lesser will be driven off the board, he consorts with fox pundits regularly Dragonfli Feb 2016 #11

well if they hire him, it will at least confirm his pov. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #13

I take it Lesser hasn't been mooching Sanders up Hortensis Feb 2016 #45

does lesser have a job or a program? restorefreedom Feb 2016 #48

I notice I misspelled Leser's name. I just know I don't follow any Hortensis Feb 2016 #66

oh, ok. i hadn't even noticed the speller :) nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #67

Under the bus because what? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #71

Also the confidence and gravitas to accept criticism without being defensive loyalsister Feb 2016 #15

I believe this photo is from 2008. bvar22 Feb 2016 #26

will be interesting to see if she follows suit this time. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #40

Well, Obama doesn't do fuax noise either anymore kydo Feb 2016 #28

Wasn't Obama interviewed by Bill O'Reilly on Fox? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #34

once back 2008 so was HRC kydo Feb 2016 #43

Then your statement was false. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #46

No my statement isn't false, he did it in 2008 and said never again kydo Feb 2016 #49

You: "Well, Obama doesn't do fuax noise either" beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #51

what ever ... thing is he doesn't do faux noise any more that make you feel better? kydo Feb 2016 #53

It's not about how I feel, it's about factual information. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #58

you left out the word "anymore"- just so you could claim it's a lie. Kinda sleazy edit. bettyellen Feb 2016 #84

The SLEAZY EDIT came from that poster, they put the word 'anymore' in after being called on it: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #86

Hello! Ready to apologize yet, bettyellen? I'm waiting. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #90

I don't see any edits on that post. And "doesn't do" is current tense, so they did not imply.... bettyellen Feb 2016 #95

I Iisted the edits and the post is right there for you to see. I'll take that apology. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #97

"so there for I would assume it is safe to say he don't do the fake news channel" AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #59

you understand there is a difference between don't and has not? Obama learned it's a trap. bettyellen Feb 2016 #99

How about that apology? You see the edits now, don't you? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #102

I think alerting over this shit is pathetic, so no. I do not see the edit, if so they clarified. bettyellen Feb 2016 #107

The edits are right there at the bottom, why can't you see them? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #108

They are not showing up. And this distracts from the fact that the edit did not change anything. bettyellen Feb 2016 #111

It changes everything since it was enough for you to accuse me of lying. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #114

Of editing to remove context, not lying. DOES NOT DO DOES NOT MEAN NEVER DID. bettyellen Feb 2016 #116

The POST WAS EDITED TO INCLUDE ANOTHER WORD WHICH CHANGED THE MEANING. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #118

Does not do = present tense= the truth. how you can accuse people to lying when they did not- bettyellen Feb 2016 #119

I never said they lied, quit trying to put words in my mouth. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #121

Sanders is untrappable AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #127

2010 Perogie Feb 2016 #104

Both President Obama and Hillary appeared on FNS during the 2008 primary. CentralMass Feb 2016 #39

the word "do"= parent tense. They learned the hard way. bettyellen Feb 2016 #101

Yes he does: bvar22 Feb 2016 #47

This message was self-deleted by its author 840high Feb 2016 #55

Nice edit, care to explain why you added the word 'anymore' after the fact? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #92

Was this post edited? I am wondering why I cannot see them- as I do for other posters? bettyellen Feb 2016 #100

Right there at the bottom of the screen: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #103

Strange it is not showing up- yet I test edited my own post and see that edit. Odd. bettyellen Feb 2016 #105

Thank you. If edited before a certain time the red text announcing it was edited won't show. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #106

Oh, interesting.... But I don't understand how you can see the edit and I cannot then? bettyellen Feb 2016 #110

The fact that they HAD to edit their post proves it was factually incorrect. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #112

No, it was a clarification and nothing more. And I am not certain about the edit. How you can see bettyellen Feb 2016 #115

I don't need to, the edits are there for all to see, once again you're wrong. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #122

How can you be the only one seeing the edit? You said it was edited to quickly to show- but you can bettyellen Feb 2016 #123

It's at the bottom of the page, quit pretending the information isn't there. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #124

Oh weird- when did they move out of the box down to the bottom of the page? I just did a test edit bettyellen Feb 2016 #125

I don't know, I didn't know it was ever anywhere else. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #128

believe they used to be inside the box years ago- and the tests I run show me my edit inside in red bettyellen Feb 2016 #131

Nope, we're good. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #132

I was worried it was ANOTHER funky thing my computer was doing this week. Glad it is not. bettyellen Feb 2016 #133

The Revolution is highly invested in anti-Hillary artillery from the Right. LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #30

Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #62

+1 MrWendel Feb 2016 #76

Ohhh yeah. n/t cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #42

Bernie went to a Black Forum in Minneapolis. Hillary chickened out too. thereismore Feb 2016 #54

and they played a clip of her in a debate Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #56

Afraid????? Beacool Feb 2016 #57

How about this year? Afraid 840high Feb 2016 #60

Oh, please..... Beacool Feb 2016 #64

She provides the material. 840high Feb 2016 #73

so did obama restorefreedom Feb 2016 #61

Fox is still the number one "news" channel as far as ratings are concerned dana_b Feb 2016 #63

yup. and any non interventionist, anti free traders who don't like trump or those struggling... restorefreedom Feb 2016 #65

Yes. Besides I like 840high Feb 2016 #72

Surprised a Fox newser would have Sanders on - their viewers rurallib Feb 2016 #77

they've been stewing in their own propaganda long enough they think that THEY'LL MisterP Feb 2016 #79

i know, he may just have converted a few....nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #81

was she asked to come on? one_voice Feb 2016 #78

every week since she announced. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #80

Well I don't look at any democratic candidate... one_voice Feb 2016 #109

we need to take every opportunity to get the message out restorefreedom Feb 2016 #113

They would attack and smear Hillary and would Bernie too IF he gets the nomination. bettyellen Feb 2016 #117

they are fools. they are going to lose anyway. but yes, no doubt they would ask tough questions nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #120

Hillary hasn't spoken to the media in over 2 weeks. Heard on cnn today that her traveling jillan Feb 2016 #82

i noticed that. i think the campaign is in major panic mode restorefreedom Feb 2016 #83

That's one of the reasons I support Bernie. It doesn't matter who he talks to.... jillan Feb 2016 #93

yup. a consistent and worthy message does not need to hide. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #96

Since when is a refusal to go on Fox news synonymous with a fear to do so? LonePirate Feb 2016 #85

every single week since the campaign began? restorefreedom Feb 2016 #88

Jumping to conclusions to fit a negative narrative benefits no one. LonePirate Feb 2016 #91

its an opinion based on facts restorefreedom Feb 2016 #94

There are no facts that indicate fear is the reason she refuses to go on Fox News. LonePirate Feb 2016 #98

And I GUARANTEE YOU Le Taz Hot Feb 2016 #87

no doubt in my mind :) nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #89

Indeed! n/t arcane1 Feb 2016 #126

Hillary was also afraid to attend the Black America Forum last week. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #130

sure seems like. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #135