2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Official Hillary Clinton releasing transcripts COUNTDOWN CLOCK! [View all]MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)What's the difference between THAT and changing the subject?
The subject surrounds the issues you've managed to steer away from ...
The enormous speaking fees DIRECTLY link to a corrupt campaign finance system that has only worsened. By the total count, $21M in speaking fees correlate with how much Wall Street becomes a special interests for HRC, and she isn't sharing what could be an obvious proof that there is NO correlation.
Can you find any countdown clock that has asked Bernie Sanders for transcripts of his speeches? No... HRC, in response to asking for hers, asked that EVERYONE share there transcripts before she thinks about it some more.
What's to hide? Would seeing them correlate HRC's Wall Street special interest?
I think enough people have responded to the issue of Wall Street and K Street owning candidates to support a WIDE interest in HRC's showing what her support of Wall Street's business as usual was. We already heard from a participant who said HRC's speech was GLOWING about Wall Street.
But, you keep changing the subject by asking more questions of whoever questions you. So, your real answer is, "Nobody wants to know". Who is this "nobody"? And, how do you know?
Given that the same issues meets with a HUGE response from the HUGE crowds at Sander's, I'd say thousands and thousands of persons in one venue alone with not agree with you. In fact, they'd boo you right off the stage, the same way they did after HRC's low blows were met with booing.
Can you HANDLE the question without asking another question.?