Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

secondwind

(16,903 posts) Sun Oct 7, 2012, 11:05 AM Oct 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]

This message was self-deleted by its author (secondwind) on Sun Oct 7, 2012, 03:03 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] secondwind Oct 2012 OP

That suggests they lose all credibility fugop Oct 2012 #1

HUH??? what numbers taken pre debate would just come out tomorrow? Are we talking a state poll? jezebel Oct 2012 #2

Makes zero sense, the debate was last Wednesday BeyondGeography Oct 2012 #3

OMG Bunny is all over this Cirque du So-What Oct 2012 #4

Why would there be bad poll numbers for Obama PRE Debate? TroyD Oct 2012 #5

Why would they say their are bad numbers and not just show the numbers? Silent3 Oct 2012 #8

Latino enthusiasm was 77% in 2008, today it is 52% .things like that. HOWEVER, this secondwind Oct 2012 #6

Ah... fugop Oct 2012 #11

+++1 There is a need to explain the whole polling paradigm & how knowledge is affected by patrice Oct 2012 #34

Did they mention Latino Decisions says Obama is polling higher than in 2008? TroyD Oct 2012 #12

Obviously, your characterization of that as "CRUSHING" is something we don't agree with. speedoo Oct 2012 #15

I'm watching and I did not hear anything like that. speedoo Oct 2012 #7

Me Neither Godless in Seattle Oct 2012 #13

Me Neither DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #14

I'm smelling some wind alright.. but it's not Second wind, it's fecund wind. progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #19

They were plus 3 9/26 - 9/30. Jennicut Oct 2012 #9

Why would they release Pre-Debate polls? TroyD Oct 2012 #10

makes no sense BelieveMe3 Oct 2012 #16

Where's The Hemlock? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #17

I watched MTP this morning helpisontheway Oct 2012 #18

of course, that's ridiculous, because the Dems have been dominating early voting. progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #20

I'm not an alarmist.. I don't even post regularly... it just stunned me, that's all. secondwind Oct 2012 #36

That's All There Was DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #21

So we should all be really scared, right? Give it a break, secondwindbag. MjolnirTime Oct 2012 #22

That Was A Bit Harsh But I Propose A New Forum DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #23

I am soooo there. mucifer Oct 2012 #27

gosh, I hardly post here.. I was concerned... and that is that. secondwind Oct 2012 #37

who says so?? grasswire Oct 2012 #24

can we alert on posts that are obviously disinformation? nt grasswire Oct 2012 #25

Yes of course you can. This is a trollish fear uncertainty and doubt post. Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #32

I don't like messed-with crap like this either & would prefer not to have it here, but . . . patrice Oct 2012 #35

You must have been listening to Chucky Todd. liberal N proud Oct 2012 #26

How would anyone know those poll numbers today??? graham4anything Oct 2012 #28

DO YOU MEAN POST-DEBATE? Why the hell do I care for PRE-DEBATE POLL NUMBERS? WI_DEM Oct 2012 #29

Was that Chuck Todd who said on Friday morning the Unemployment number will not be good? itsrobert Oct 2012 #30

Why don't we just wait until tomorrow when they are released and decide for ourselves WI_DEM Oct 2012 #31

OP was totally wrong. speedoo Oct 2012 #33

I'd be so embarassed about posting this I do believe I would delete it. Good god. n/t K Gardner Oct 2012 #38