2016 Postmortem

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)

13. Well, you kind of twisted what he said, but that seems to be the Clinton tactic these days.

Tue Feb 16, 2016, 11:45 AM

Feb 2016

He didn't say she couldn't be trusted to appoint someone in general, but only someone who might rule against her handlers on Wall Street. Even Hillary won't bite the hand that writes million-dollar checks for her slush funds.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

141 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nasty Hit: Top Sanders Advisor Questions Hillary's Capacity to Appoint Scalia Replacement [View all] Cary Feb 2016 OP

"Democrats do not question other Democrats� fitness to appoint Supreme Court justices. Period." AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #1

it's a low blow, and unsupported by the facts bigtree Feb 2016 #2

"The Sanders campaign needs to focus on promoting their candidate ..." Cary Feb 2016 #6

No reason in particular Cary Feb 2016 #3

So Democrats are fallible? AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #7

Do you have a relevant point to make? Cary Feb 2016 #8

Yes, and that point is: AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #29

So you advocate a scorched earth approach to the Democratic nomination Cary Feb 2016 #32

So any critique whatsoever is scorched earth? AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #37

As I said below I can draw the line between character assissination and constructive debate Cary Feb 2016 #43

lol@ "Constructive debate" AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #46

Not surprised that you take that as a joke. Cary Feb 2016 #64

Uh....maybe you shouldn't get into the topic of character assassination... pangaia Feb 2016 #128

i shouldn't? Cary Feb 2016 #130

I still question if BS is a Democrat at all liberal N proud Feb 2016 #76

You say that like it's a bad thing. beedle Feb 2016 #79

Bashing someone then expecting them to let you into their group is a BAD THING! liberal N proud Feb 2016 #83

That's why no one is asking anymore ... beedle Feb 2016 #99

So you're saying BS LIED to get into the Democratic Party at the last minute? Wow, just wow. Hekate Feb 2016 #124

Define "lied" when you're talking about politics. beedle Feb 2016 #141

Do you understand the differences between, Democrat, Democrat, democrat and democrat? pangaia Feb 2016 #131

I am sure you can enlighten the world liberal N proud Feb 2016 #140

Really fucking shady on their part. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #4

It was petty and un-called for. Sanders camp demonstrates a passive-aggressive riversedge Feb 2016 #5

That's all they got these days uponit7771 Feb 2016 #9

That's a hit? LOL! If that is too nasty for Hillary than she has no business running for President. jillan Feb 2016 #10

Great point!!! Cary Feb 2016 #15

The point is SO WHAT if someone questioned her. It's not a hit, it's a question. jillan Feb 2016 #27

He didn't "question" her, he made a flat out statement statement CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #33

Why are those who attack Sanders the most, also the most thin skinned AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #38

Why is it that such a nice guy like Sanders has attracted so many people... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #48

Case in point AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #51

Excellent question Cary Feb 2016 #59

So you see no distinction between character assassination and discussing issues Cary Feb 2016 #40

If you think this is a hit - you guys better toughen up. jillan Feb 2016 #49

"You guys?" Cary Feb 2016 #53

real rich Robbins Feb 2016 #11

Excuse me while I interrupt your red herring... Cary Feb 2016 #12

Ever hear of the "Horseshoe Principal" of political science CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #36

Well, you kind of twisted what he said, but that seems to be the Clinton tactic these days. nichomachus Feb 2016 #13

Look at the source. zalinda Feb 2016 #14

You left off your refutation of the substance. Cary Feb 2016 #20

David Brock's media outlet. Imagine that... newthinking Feb 2016 #21

Yep, Hillary's own propaganda outlet. Not to mention we don't trust Hillary. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #88

Re-post Kittycat Feb 2016 #16

Oh, goodie. Another whining Brock hit piece for R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #17

A candidate beholden to Big Money can't be fully trusted to regulate Big Money. Orsino Feb 2016 #18

That's the smell of desperation and fear. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #19

I question Hillary's democratic party loyalty based NowSam Feb 2016 #22

Godwin shenmue Feb 2016 #100

I just call it like I see it. NowSam Feb 2016 #122

It is a totally acceptable comment and question Red Oak Feb 2016 #23

Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer bigtree Feb 2016 #24

Oh, I missed when Hillary appointed them. How'd she do that? Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #26

Larry Summers and Alan Greenspan Red Oak Feb 2016 #31

I've heard that Greenspan. PyaarRevolution Feb 2016 #73

Telling the truth is "nasty"? No, a legitimate concern was voiced. IdaBriggs Feb 2016 #25

weak. Why can't he campaign on supreme court appointments? n/t yodermon Feb 2016 #28

She will appoint a corporatist judge. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #30

Obama will appoint Scalia replacement Catbird Feb 2016 #34

Don't hold your breath CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #39

Correct Cary Feb 2016 #66

One cannot fix a problem with the same mentality that created it in the first place. libdem4life Feb 2016 #35

Blah blah Cary Feb 2016 #41

Starting at the "blah blah", have no idea what you're trying to say. Feel free to try again. libdem4life Feb 2016 #44

I'm sure you don't have any idea. Cary Feb 2016 #50

Great. I just couldn't tell...thanks for clearing it up. libdem4life Feb 2016 #54

I share Bernies concern. I do not see Bernie or Hillary supporters as trolls, Autumn Feb 2016 #42

"I do Bernie would chose someone that would take the correct stand on that important issue." Cary Feb 2016 #45

I left out the word "think". I have edited my post. Thank you for your deep concern. Autumn Feb 2016 #55

Anyone who has critical thinking skills... Cary Feb 2016 #56

RBG may need to be replaced within the next 4-8 years though Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #58

Sanders' Advisor Questions Hillary's Capacity to Appoint SC Justice who will take the issue of GreatGazoo Feb 2016 #47

+1 Go Vols Feb 2016 #84

Quick! Call the whaaambulance! If Hillary can't stand the heat . . . - nt KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #52

I truly wonder what you think you accomplish with a comment like that. Cary Feb 2016 #60

You're the one who alleged that Sanders is waging a 'war of personal destruction against KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #71

One of the main problems I have with Bernie Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #57

I don't have a problem with Bernie Cary Feb 2016 #61

Sorry, do you mind linking this story from a non-trash site? JackRiddler Feb 2016 #62

Is it okay with you that I don't buy your assumptions? Cary Feb 2016 #67

I'm not a paid liar, for starters. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #72

^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #89

Wrong Cary Feb 2016 #92

Beautifully said! Puglover Feb 2016 #101

It's true, she can't be trusted on this issue. She is violating the current campaign finance laws morningfog Feb 2016 #63

"...benefiting from Citizen's United." Cary Feb 2016 #65

No, even worse is that she violates the spirit of the law as well. morningfog Feb 2016 #69

I see Cary Feb 2016 #70

Are you saying it is not illegal for a campaign to coordinate directly with a SuperPAC? morningfog Feb 2016 #77

oh? GuardianOne Feb 2016 #68

I agree completely and have been saying so for months. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #74

Brock thinks that's unacceptable? The guy who called Anita Hill "slutty"? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #75

Hilarious! Cary Feb 2016 #80

What do you expect when you post a hit piece by a misogynist who helped destroy a victim? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #82

What do I expect when I post logic and reason here? Cary Feb 2016 #85

Brock the sleazy lying former right wing attack dog = logic and reason? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #87

I'm so happy for you. Cary Feb 2016 #90

About Brock? Nope, I'm all done. Sorry the truth hurts but you'll get over it. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #93

IOW you don't have anything relevant to say. Cary Feb 2016 #98

.+10 840high Feb 2016 #109

The truth hurts Android3.14 Feb 2016 #78

Is that supposed to be directed at me? Cary Feb 2016 #86

Who is the candidate accepting corporate funding? Android3.14 Feb 2016 #91

You think "it is the fundamental weakness..." Cary Feb 2016 #95

With that post, you illustrate a fundamental flaw, not just a weakness Android3.14 Feb 2016 #104

I haven't insulted anyone. Cary Feb 2016 #106

The fundamental flaw in your argument is the assumption Android3.14 Feb 2016 #110

I have not insulted you. Period. Cary Feb 2016 #113

What a bizarre response Android3.14 Feb 2016 #114

I thought you said you were not going to insult me? Cary Feb 2016 #117

Noting something is bizarre is only an insult if you take it as one Android3.14 Feb 2016 #125

^^^THIS TOO^^^ beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #96

Explain to me why they should care about you? Cary Feb 2016 #97

Or you can answer the question. Cary Feb 2016 #107

K&R asuhornets Feb 2016 #81

Where's the "nasty" part? He's questioning her capacity to do more than act liberal occasionally. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #94

What's so horrible about the idea that we have 2 excellent candidates? Cary Feb 2016 #105

I don't see 2 excellent candidates. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #111

So if you don't get what you want when you want it you take your ball and you go home Cary Feb 2016 #112

No. I always vote. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #116

So if you don't get your way you will vote for Trump, Cruz, Rubio, ... Cary Feb 2016 #119

Fortunately, my ballot comes with more than two choices if that's what happens. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #121

Yes, yes, .... Cary Feb 2016 #123

Why should I be satisfied? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #129

Isn't this the same Tad BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #102

Pretty shady. Bernie's great. However Tad Devine is a shit-head IMHO emulatorloo Feb 2016 #103

Why shouldn't Democrats 840high Feb 2016 #108

No one said Democrats shouldn't question other Democrats Cary Feb 2016 #115

A Real Dem party does not have 840high Feb 2016 #118

Nonsense Cary Feb 2016 #120

Yes, a nasty low blow. n/t DesertRat Feb 2016 #126

I certainly question her ability to appoint someone re: campaign finance reform. basselope Feb 2016 #127

They love to use the "trust" word all the time. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2016 #132

No no no Cary Feb 2016 #133

It's all moot ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2016 #135

Poor, poor Hillary. The victim who would be President. frylock Feb 2016 #134

What nonsense. Classic straw man argument. thesquanderer Feb 2016 #136

Yep--Top Sanders Advisor Should Be Fired By Sanders, IMO! MADem Feb 2016 #137

Bernie doesn't have a legal background. ecstatic Feb 2016 #138

AND 4 good reason, since she willing to give away a woman's right to choose, god know who she'd pick krawhitham Feb 2016 #139