Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why many Sanders supporters claim they won't vote for Hillary: [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)58. So glad to hear that Reagan had no effect on government.
Oh wait! He did. And radically shifted the country to the right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
222 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why many Sanders supporters claim they won't vote for Hillary: [View all]
Flying Squirrel
Feb 2016
OP
Such an immature way to look at our system. Play my way or I take the ball and go home.
randys1
Feb 2016
#1
And this is exactly WHY so many Bernie supporters will never support Hillary, rhetoric like yours
pinebox
Feb 2016
#192
When taking the ball and going home is your only power, sometimes you have to use it
krawhitham
Feb 2016
#53
And yet, they get offended when someone called them the Tea Party of the Left.
Beacool
Feb 2016
#102
You know you will not be successful shaming people into voting. That you can be sure of. In fact
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2016
#119
Both sides are trying to shame the other into voting for their candidate. Also threatening that.....
kerry-is-my-prez
Feb 2016
#195
You misunderstand, the ball is not ours to take home. Rewarding bad behavior only perpetuates it.
A Simple Game
Feb 2016
#89
'Nothing to lose' like Hillary supporters who live in multimillion dollar manhattan condos
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2016
#50
Hillary has tons of low income supporters. And they have been slammed here for being ignorant
bettyellen
Feb 2016
#54
nope, we were talking about those who will not vote in the general election. they are often viewed
bettyellen
Feb 2016
#73
Nothing to gain? How about SCOTUS appointments who are not right wing ideologes . . .
brush
Feb 2016
#117
Any SCOTUS appointments Sanders makes will be at least as progressive as Hillary's.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2016
#166
Nope- he has only one litmus test- Citizen's United. And he deserves every bit of grief he is going
bettyellen
Feb 2016
#170
Saying that is a litmus test is not the same thing as saying that is his only consideration.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2016
#173
You honestly are suggesting the guy with the 100% NARAL rating is gonna nominate an anti-choicer.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2016
#178
Why the hell does he say ONE litmus test? I think he usually says what he means.
bettyellen
Feb 2016
#180
Personally, I would've appreciated it if the debates could've spent some time on reproductive choice
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2016
#183
Pretty sure there was an op today where Hillary actually put specific abortion bans on the table
Matt_in_STL
Feb 2016
#212
I'll post wherever I want and will be voting for the dem nominee whoever it is in the GE
brush
Feb 2016
#208
Reading Comprehension. It's not just a good idea, it's... yeah, it's a good idea.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2016
#165
Further, the Democratic Party has gone out of its way to make us unwelcome in their Party.
Maedhros
Feb 2016
#149
They have nothing to lose because all the people that keep getting elected have already given it
CBGLuthier
Feb 2016
#206
I will vote for her if I have to, but I will be crying inside over what might have been.
GreenPartyVoter
Feb 2016
#4
That graph is very troubling. Would you please post the link to the page where you found it.
MerryBlooms
Feb 2016
#37
Here... There's a good bit more to the site as well including a test to locate you on the chart
Fumesucker
Feb 2016
#60
It's the same reason people riot and burn down a grocery store, even though they need groceries
Cheese Sandwich
Feb 2016
#13
Most millennials seem to think that Clinton is simply the best of all the Republicans running for
Attorney in Texas
Feb 2016
#16
People who like Hillary's economic policies are closer to Jeb than to Bernie. So maybe they don't
GoneFishin
Feb 2016
#135
If both choices in the general election have often been unpalatable to you ...
Martin Eden
Feb 2016
#63
President Obama hasn't exactly been a warrior for social change. It's more like
Gene Debs
Feb 2016
#123
What reason do I have to think that campaign finance will improve in a Clinton presidency?
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#52
I care about record. She can say anything she wants -- I care about the evidence.
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#76
Because I'd rather have a president I agree with 60% of the time than one I agree with
Feeling the Bern
Feb 2016
#136
I'm 58 and he has me lock , stock and support !! I'd vote for Hillary but I wouldn't want to . n/t
orpupilofnature57
Feb 2016
#82
Posting an article encouraging people not to vote for the Democratic nominee. What a disingenuous
still_one
Feb 2016
#115
Because this is the DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, and the TOS are NOT to post articles
still_one
Feb 2016
#129
Nader is an arragont asshole, who lives on his millions from his mutual funds and B.S.
still_one
Feb 2016
#127
That nails it. I see many posts from people trying to convince themselves it is untrue. But
GoneFishin
Feb 2016
#132
+1 I'm upset with this, didn't think Bernie would lead youth up a garden path
flamingdem
Feb 2016
#191
Some folks may be tired of continually being told to choose between the...
Joe the Revelator
Feb 2016
#186