Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is what political desperation reads like.... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #1
+1000 grasswire Feb 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #3
It's just getting pathetic now. #SelfRespect TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #46
That's the perfect word for it. Pathetic. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #72
So are Bernie supporters showing desperation when they have a countdown Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #4
No... One of the main principles of this Political Revolution is that a rigged political system berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #11
"The interest we have in seeing hillary's speeches ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #21
You don't actually believe that do you ?.. how do I argue with your logic.. you are saying that berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #29
I think I have made myself quite clear. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #35
I disagree... I think your argument in transparent and any application of logic berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #37
"As for the point 1 theory.. the facts are there." NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #43
Obfuscate and Straw man all the way to another primary loss for hillary... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #44
I'm obfuscating? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #48
No answers to my multiple attempts at asking you some questions ? berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #53
"Why Hillary Clinton Will NEVER Release Transcripts Of Her Paid Speeches" berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #57
Um, he fired them. DNC went overboard and against their own rules. As someone stated, libdem4life Feb 2016 #89
Can you stay on topic? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #169
My topic is the billions of dollars bill & hillary have taken from millionaires and billionaires berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #171
I posted the OP. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #173
Goodbye Nance.. good luck ... hope you end up seeing what is right in front of you.. the system berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #175
Clear but borderline wacky...maybe not even borderline. Such flawless logic. Not. libdem4life Feb 2016 #88
Me too...He never explained how it all went down...n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #153
Sure he did - well, the campaign did. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #166
First of all, what exactly was illegally done, aside from the DNC blocking Bernie from access? cui bono Feb 2016 #36
That might be a fair offer IF floriduck Feb 2016 #137
Agreed!!!! n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #150
Trying to explain it to someone who is that deprived logic (and other things) is not worth it davidpdx Feb 2016 #58
I think you are right... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #60
Yep and it's always the usual suspects davidpdx Feb 2016 #61
I'd creatively rationalize a distinction lacking a relevant too if my bias on doing so. LanternWaste Feb 2016 #183
Thank you. Bernie is new, fresh and awesome. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #85
He's so dreamy Empowerer Feb 2016 #157
Copycat = desperation and doubt. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #128
So it's NOT desperation to want to see HRC's ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #7
Are you kidding.. are you equivocating the 2 events... really.. berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #16
The lack of logic BERNS. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #167
+420 berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #172
Welcome to DU. R B Garr Feb 2016 #90
You not only went off the rails with this nonsense madokie Feb 2016 #5
Tell me where I "went off the rails". NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #10
If you can't see that madokie Feb 2016 #12
The classic non-answer. n/t NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #23
Excellent question Nance. sheshe2 Feb 2016 #6
Yes, do tell Iliyah Feb 2016 #8
I am tired of shooting the fish in this barrel. SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #9
Why did you say sheshe2 Feb 2016 #17
Not Good Enough, sheshe2! cui bono Feb 2016 #38
Did you say English idiom? JackRiddler Feb 2016 #147
Did you say English?? enigmatic Feb 2016 #156
But they're fish right there in that barrel.... ugh.. sand..insert..head.. berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #18
WARNING: Don't say anything about giving her enough rope so she'll hang herself! cui bono Feb 2016 #42
Oh snap. Kentonio Feb 2016 #49
Could someone suffocate with both feet stuffed in her mouth? Divernan Feb 2016 #66
Precisely, Nance.. What's good enough for Hillary is good enough for BS, too. Cha Feb 2016 #13
Bernie never asked Hillary to release those speech transcripts. phleshdef Feb 2016 #14
I agree. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #15
I'm a Bernie supporter and I'm staying out of the mud slinging and recognizing that... phleshdef Feb 2016 #20
Again, I agree. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #26
You 'agree' except that you don't. Because here you are AGAIN doing what you claim you agree cui bono Feb 2016 #33
The way I look at it, I'd much rather be demanding the private paid speeches from GOP candidates. phleshdef Feb 2016 #34
Again, we are in agreement. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #40
You could stay out of the mud slinging, too. joshcryer Feb 2016 #45
So could the BSers. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #47
as such an avowed Hillary supporter you should know Hillary/DWS/DNC azurnoir Feb 2016 #52
So then you actually *don't* agree with phleshdef. cui bono Feb 2016 #99
Hillary doesn't owe me the release of those transcripts. Beowulf Feb 2016 #115
Flop sweat. bvf Feb 2016 #19
Does that mean ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #28
No surprise, there. bvf Feb 2016 #50
What do you think he hasn't disclosed? beedle Feb 2016 #92
I think I love you Nance! Lucinda Feb 2016 #22
This is just crazy talk Trajan Feb 2016 #24
Precisely madokie Feb 2016 #25
It doesn't "make sense" ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #27
Typical straw argument... make up opponents argument and knock it down yourself... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #31
+420 berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #30
Thank you for pointing out the truth davidpdx Feb 2016 #59
Pot and kettle methinks. eom BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #79
No, the truth is that Sanders didn't ask about it. davidpdx Feb 2016 #139
I don't think we are talking about the same BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #160
I'm talking about who asked about the transcripts during the debate davidpdx Feb 2016 #162
BERNGHAZI!!! cui bono Feb 2016 #32
Dish it out? MrWendel Feb 2016 #39
Look here Laughing Mirror Feb 2016 #41
I proudly stand with Nance Greggs v2.0.08, that lady was a sharp judge of character Fumesucker Feb 2016 #51
+2008 frylock Feb 2016 #107
Got any samples? JackRiddler Feb 2016 #146
These are from a SINGLE thread in 2008 cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #155
Sanders did none of this stuff personally. It doesn't add up to ONE Clinton Wall Street fundraiser. mhatrw Feb 2016 #54
I know jpb33 Feb 2016 #65
FAIL AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #55
Isn't there an ongoing investigation that Sanders demanded? Helen Borg Feb 2016 #56
Good post Gothmog Feb 2016 #62
Wow jpb33 Feb 2016 #63
Another Capehart like smear. SMDH nt MaeScott Feb 2016 #64
I'd like to know the details myself bravenak Feb 2016 #67
IIRC, four basic things happened that day Deny and Shred Feb 2016 #68
If you really wanted to know what happened you would ask DWS to support an independent investigation Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #69
Exactly. Let's go all out and find out everything. wavesofeuphoria Feb 2016 #103
Fail. Warren Stupidity Feb 2016 #70
Desperation is a sad thing. cali Feb 2016 #71
You're better than this Nance! berni_mccoy Feb 2016 #73
She has proven time again that, no, she really isn't LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #95
Nah. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #105
No , sorry . TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #120
With Hillary workers showing up at Bernie supporters' homes because their names Vinca Feb 2016 #74
This! And emails as well. jillan Feb 2016 #164
The sweet smell of Hillarian desperation in the morning! 99Forever Feb 2016 #75
It smells like VICTORY Uponthegears Feb 2016 #77
K & R, thanks nance, equal expectations, if not equal Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #76
Knew it was only a matter of time till Thinkingabout made an appearance...eom berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #176
Yuck, left-overs again. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #78
Tsk, Nance, you KNOW BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #80
How could anyone disagree with that? mcar Feb 2016 #81
St Bernard does not have the same standards treestar Feb 2016 #82
Bernie needs to come clean pronto! n/t cosmicone Feb 2016 #83
So does Hillary.. Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #158
Lol I believe pushing this issue will be bad for Clinton 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #84
Don't ask me. I'm still waiting for birth certificates. Buns_of_Fire Feb 2016 #86
So your countdown clock is already past zero? (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #96
! bvf Feb 2016 #138
I want the answers, too. He claims to not like money in politics, but he sure R B Garr Feb 2016 #91
As for the data access, I found it very curious about what information they actually looked at.... George II Feb 2016 #93
I think you need to dive more deeply into "Logogate" too LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #94
Apples and Oranges Armstead Feb 2016 #97
Yes, it's clear (at least publicly) that he didn't like what they did, but......... George II Feb 2016 #100
And he took responsibility for it. Armstead Feb 2016 #102
But they used that information and they're still using it. George II Feb 2016 #106
If they are using it in a nefarious way, they should be called on it Armstead Feb 2016 #109
If they got that email address from the data breach (and it's too coincidental to not think that)... George II Feb 2016 #110
Dunno. Look into it... Armstead Feb 2016 #112
I agree with your last statement - in the big picture its no big deal, but..... George II Feb 2016 #114
Are you sure you want to go there, Nance? Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #98
Whaaaaaaaaa seaotter Feb 2016 #101
Oh please tell me you're high up in the Clinton campaign. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #104
LOL!!! NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #113
Imagine those crazy people who want to know JackRiddler Feb 2016 #116
Quite frankly, it is none of your business - or anyone else's. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #123
Please use whatever influence you have with the Clinton campaign. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #144
Have you seen the transcripts? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #149
The tens of millions in payoffs for speaking are private deals. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #180
You, uh... got a beautiful home here. frylock Feb 2016 #108
K&R. Chichiri Feb 2016 #111
Yes he should because I want to know how Hillary got my email & my name during the same jillan Feb 2016 #117
Classic BSer response. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #118
Classic Clintonian response. Deny deny deny. jillan Feb 2016 #121
Deny WHAT??? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #122
My understanding is beedle Feb 2016 #119
Reduced to posting copycat threads? frylock Feb 2016 #124
I specifically "copy-catted" ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #127
The only thing that's been proven is your desperation... and the proof is a copycat thread. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #130
I've stated several times in this thread ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #134
You can state it all you want. The proof is in the pudding. Copycat threads = desperation and doubt cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #140
Do you think posting "own it" over and over ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #142
Copying who, pray tell? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #145
I'd like to know more about that breach Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #135
This is one of those experiments that have blown up by you attempting to mix apples with oranges. frylock Feb 2016 #136
Never thought I'd see you reduced to copycat posts. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #125
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #126
I wasn't "reduced" to anything. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #129
Oh yeah you were. The ONLY thing you had, the ONLY rock you could throw... was a copycat thread. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #131
I wasn't throwing anything. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #132
It worked like a charm alright. Your copycat thread worked to show doubt and desperation... cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #133
Have you looked at the polls ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #141
The trends aren't with you. You might as well be tacking against the tradewinds. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #143
Anyone who doesn't get the meaning bvf Feb 2016 #170
Well, this is interesting enigmatic Feb 2016 #148
Oh, did I say that? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #151
So Romney's 47% moment had nothing to do w/ the President being elected? enigmatic Feb 2016 #154
Probably not. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #168
You seriously are getting sillier by the week. nt Logical Feb 2016 #159
I'd like a statement as to why Bernie hasn't disavowed the RW SuperPacs campaigning on his behalf ucrdem Feb 2016 #152
chuckle Vattel Feb 2016 #161
Weak tea. DefenseLawyer Feb 2016 #163
He fired the offender. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #165
ROFLMAO! Good one! McCamy Taylor Feb 2016 #174
Aw, look at you, thinking you're a Senator holding the Watergate hearings in the 1970s! Adorable. merrily Feb 2016 #177
You can tell by the flailing responses from Sanders supporters that you hit a nerve. stevenleser Feb 2016 #178
Lol. Hardly. What's really amusing are you Hillary fans cali Feb 2016 #179
Say, are you the journalist Steven Leser, the one who called Hillary Clinton a liar JackRiddler Feb 2016 #181
You're damn right she hit a nerve. It's called the Ulnar Nerve. Look it up. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #182
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Official Bernie Relea...»Reply #8