2016 Postmortem

cui bono

(19,926 posts)

38. Not Good Enough, sheshe2!

Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:56 AM

Feb 2016

Jesus you are reaching yet again. You just can't help yourself can you? Now you've moved on from smearmongering Bernie to smearmongering DUers?

We've all heard the expression "shooting fish in a barrel" but you go ahead and try to turn it into an actual physical threat.

omg......

.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

183 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Official Bernie Releasing HIS Information Countdown Clock [View all] NanceGreggs Feb 2016 OP

This is what political desperation reads like.... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #1

+1000 grasswire Feb 2016 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #3

It's just getting pathetic now. #SelfRespect TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #46

That's the perfect word for it. Pathetic. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #72

So are Bernie supporters showing desperation when they have a countdown Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #4

No... One of the main principles of this Political Revolution is that a rigged political system berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #11

"The interest we have in seeing hillary's speeches ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #21

You don't actually believe that do you ?.. how do I argue with your logic.. you are saying that berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #29

I think I have made myself quite clear. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #35

I disagree... I think your argument in transparent and any application of logic berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #37

"As for the point 1 theory.. the facts are there." NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #43

Obfuscate and Straw man all the way to another primary loss for hillary... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #44

I'm obfuscating? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #48

No answers to my multiple attempts at asking you some questions ? berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #53

"Why Hillary Clinton Will NEVER Release Transcripts Of Her Paid Speeches" berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #57

Um, he fired them. DNC went overboard and against their own rules. As someone stated, libdem4life Feb 2016 #89

Can you stay on topic? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #169

My topic is the billions of dollars bill & hillary have taken from millionaires and billionaires berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #171

I posted the OP. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #173

Goodbye Nance.. good luck ... hope you end up seeing what is right in front of you.. the system berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #175

Clear but borderline wacky...maybe not even borderline. Such flawless logic. Not. libdem4life Feb 2016 #88

Me too...He never explained how it all went down...n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #153

Sure he did - well, the campaign did. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #166

First of all, what exactly was illegally done, aside from the DNC blocking Bernie from access? cui bono Feb 2016 #36

That might be a fair offer IF floriduck Feb 2016 #137

Agreed!!!! n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #150

Trying to explain it to someone who is that deprived logic (and other things) is not worth it davidpdx Feb 2016 #58

I think you are right... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #60

Yep and it's always the usual suspects davidpdx Feb 2016 #61

I'd creatively rationalize a distinction lacking a relevant too if my bias on doing so. LanternWaste Feb 2016 #183

Thank you. Bernie is new, fresh and awesome. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #85

He's so dreamy Empowerer Feb 2016 #157

Copycat = desperation and doubt. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #128

So it's NOT desperation to want to see HRC's ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #7

Are you kidding.. are you equivocating the 2 events... really.. berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #16

The lack of logic BERNS. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #167

+420 berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #172

Welcome to DU. R B Garr Feb 2016 #90

You not only went off the rails with this nonsense madokie Feb 2016 #5

Tell me where I "went off the rails". NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #10

If you can't see that madokie Feb 2016 #12

The classic non-answer. n/t NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #23

Excellent question Nance. sheshe2 Feb 2016 #6

Yes, do tell Iliyah Feb 2016 #8

I am tired of shooting the fish in this barrel. SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #9

Why did you say sheshe2 Feb 2016 #17

Not Good Enough, sheshe2! cui bono Feb 2016 #38

Did you say English idiom? JackRiddler Feb 2016 #147

Did you say English?? enigmatic Feb 2016 #156

But they're fish right there in that barrel.... ugh.. sand..insert..head.. berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #18

WARNING: Don't say anything about giving her enough rope so she'll hang herself! cui bono Feb 2016 #42

Oh snap. Kentonio Feb 2016 #49

Could someone suffocate with both feet stuffed in her mouth? Divernan Feb 2016 #66

Precisely, Nance.. What's good enough for Hillary is good enough for BS, too. Cha Feb 2016 #13

Bernie never asked Hillary to release those speech transcripts. phleshdef Feb 2016 #14

I agree. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #15

I'm a Bernie supporter and I'm staying out of the mud slinging and recognizing that... phleshdef Feb 2016 #20

Again, I agree. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #26

You 'agree' except that you don't. Because here you are AGAIN doing what you claim you agree cui bono Feb 2016 #33

The way I look at it, I'd much rather be demanding the private paid speeches from GOP candidates. phleshdef Feb 2016 #34

Again, we are in agreement. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #40

You could stay out of the mud slinging, too. joshcryer Feb 2016 #45

So could the BSers. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #47

as such an avowed Hillary supporter you should know Hillary/DWS/DNC azurnoir Feb 2016 #52

So then you actually *don't* agree with phleshdef. cui bono Feb 2016 #99

Hillary doesn't owe me the release of those transcripts. Beowulf Feb 2016 #115

Flop sweat. bvf Feb 2016 #19

Does that mean ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #28

No surprise, there. bvf Feb 2016 #50

What do you think he hasn't disclosed? beedle Feb 2016 #92

I think I love you Nance! Lucinda Feb 2016 #22

This is just crazy talk Trajan Feb 2016 #24

Precisely madokie Feb 2016 #25

It doesn't "make sense" ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #27

Typical straw argument... make up opponents argument and knock it down yourself... berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #31

+420 berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #30

Thank you for pointing out the truth davidpdx Feb 2016 #59

Pot and kettle methinks. eom BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #79

No, the truth is that Sanders didn't ask about it. davidpdx Feb 2016 #139

I don't think we are talking about the same BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #160

I'm talking about who asked about the transcripts during the debate davidpdx Feb 2016 #162

BERNGHAZI!!! cui bono Feb 2016 #32

Dish it out? MrWendel Feb 2016 #39

Look here Laughing Mirror Feb 2016 #41

I proudly stand with Nance Greggs v2.0.08, that lady was a sharp judge of character Fumesucker Feb 2016 #51

+2008 frylock Feb 2016 #107

Got any samples? JackRiddler Feb 2016 #146

These are from a SINGLE thread in 2008 cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #155

Sanders did none of this stuff personally. It doesn't add up to ONE Clinton Wall Street fundraiser. mhatrw Feb 2016 #54

I know jpb33 Feb 2016 #65

FAIL AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #55

Isn't there an ongoing investigation that Sanders demanded? Helen Borg Feb 2016 #56

Good post Gothmog Feb 2016 #62

Wow jpb33 Feb 2016 #63

Another Capehart like smear. SMDH nt MaeScott Feb 2016 #64

I'd like to know the details myself bravenak Feb 2016 #67

IIRC, four basic things happened that day Deny and Shred Feb 2016 #68

If you really wanted to know what happened you would ask DWS to support an independent investigation Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #69

Exactly. Let's go all out and find out everything. wavesofeuphoria Feb 2016 #103

Fail. Warren Stupidity Feb 2016 #70

Desperation is a sad thing. cali Feb 2016 #71

You're better than this Nance! berni_mccoy Feb 2016 #73

She has proven time again that, no, she really isn't LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #95

Nah. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #105

No , sorry . TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #120

With Hillary workers showing up at Bernie supporters' homes because their names Vinca Feb 2016 #74

This! And emails as well. jillan Feb 2016 #164

The sweet smell of Hillarian desperation in the morning! 99Forever Feb 2016 #75

It smells like VICTORY Uponthegears Feb 2016 #77

K & R, thanks nance, equal expectations, if not equal Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #76

Knew it was only a matter of time till Thinkingabout made an appearance...eom berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #176

Yuck, left-overs again. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #78

Tsk, Nance, you KNOW BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #80

How could anyone disagree with that? mcar Feb 2016 #81

St Bernard does not have the same standards treestar Feb 2016 #82

Bernie needs to come clean pronto! n/t cosmicone Feb 2016 #83

So does Hillary.. Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #158

Lol I believe pushing this issue will be bad for Clinton 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #84

Don't ask me. I'm still waiting for birth certificates. Buns_of_Fire Feb 2016 #86

So your countdown clock is already past zero? (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #87

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2016 #96

! bvf Feb 2016 #138

I want the answers, too. He claims to not like money in politics, but he sure R B Garr Feb 2016 #91

As for the data access, I found it very curious about what information they actually looked at.... George II Feb 2016 #93

I think you need to dive more deeply into "Logogate" too LondonReign2 Feb 2016 #94

Apples and Oranges Armstead Feb 2016 #97

Yes, it's clear (at least publicly) that he didn't like what they did, but......... George II Feb 2016 #100

And he took responsibility for it. Armstead Feb 2016 #102

But they used that information and they're still using it. George II Feb 2016 #106

If they are using it in a nefarious way, they should be called on it Armstead Feb 2016 #109

If they got that email address from the data breach (and it's too coincidental to not think that)... George II Feb 2016 #110

Dunno. Look into it... Armstead Feb 2016 #112

I agree with your last statement - in the big picture its no big deal, but..... George II Feb 2016 #114

Are you sure you want to go there, Nance? Rocky the Leprechaun Feb 2016 #98

Whaaaaaaaaa seaotter Feb 2016 #101

Oh please tell me you're high up in the Clinton campaign. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #104

LOL!!! NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #113

Imagine those crazy people who want to know JackRiddler Feb 2016 #116

Quite frankly, it is none of your business - or anyone else's. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #123

Please use whatever influence you have with the Clinton campaign. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #144

Have you seen the transcripts? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #149

The tens of millions in payoffs for speaking are private deals. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #180

You, uh... got a beautiful home here. frylock Feb 2016 #108

K&R. Chichiri Feb 2016 #111

Yes he should because I want to know how Hillary got my email & my name during the same jillan Feb 2016 #117

Classic BSer response. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #118

Classic Clintonian response. Deny deny deny. jillan Feb 2016 #121

Deny WHAT??? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #122

My understanding is beedle Feb 2016 #119

Reduced to posting copycat threads? frylock Feb 2016 #124

I specifically "copy-catted" ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #127

The only thing that's been proven is your desperation... and the proof is a copycat thread. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #130

I've stated several times in this thread ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #134

You can state it all you want. The proof is in the pudding. Copycat threads = desperation and doubt cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #140

Do you think posting "own it" over and over ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #142

Copying who, pray tell? cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #145

I'd like to know more about that breach Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #135

This is one of those experiments that have blown up by you attempting to mix apples with oranges. frylock Feb 2016 #136

Never thought I'd see you reduced to copycat posts. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #125

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #126

I wasn't "reduced" to anything. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #129

Oh yeah you were. The ONLY thing you had, the ONLY rock you could throw... was a copycat thread. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #131

I wasn't throwing anything. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #132

It worked like a charm alright. Your copycat thread worked to show doubt and desperation... cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #133

Have you looked at the polls ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #141

The trends aren't with you. You might as well be tacking against the tradewinds. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #143

Anyone who doesn't get the meaning bvf Feb 2016 #170

Well, this is interesting enigmatic Feb 2016 #148

Oh, did I say that? NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #151

So Romney's 47% moment had nothing to do w/ the President being elected? enigmatic Feb 2016 #154

Probably not. NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #168

You seriously are getting sillier by the week. nt Logical Feb 2016 #159

I'd like a statement as to why Bernie hasn't disavowed the RW SuperPacs campaigning on his behalf ucrdem Feb 2016 #152

chuckle Vattel Feb 2016 #161

Weak tea. DefenseLawyer Feb 2016 #163

He fired the offender. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #165

ROFLMAO! Good one! McCamy Taylor Feb 2016 #174

Aw, look at you, thinking you're a Senator holding the Watergate hearings in the 1970s! Adorable. merrily Feb 2016 #177

You can tell by the flailing responses from Sanders supporters that you hit a nerve. stevenleser Feb 2016 #178

Lol. Hardly. What's really amusing are you Hillary fans cali Feb 2016 #179

Say, are you the journalist Steven Leser, the one who called Hillary Clinton a liar JackRiddler Feb 2016 #181

You're damn right she hit a nerve. It's called the Ulnar Nerve. Look it up. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #182