2016 Postmortem

Response to Yavin4 (Reply #19)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Revolution; if you can sustain it [View all] cali Feb 2016 OP

This describes Hillary too, you know. Hortensis Feb 2016 #1

Only is the broadest way and if you cali Feb 2016 #2

+1, Cali. VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #3

Your brush only pointed Bernie in the broadest way. Hortensis Feb 2016 #7

She IS a neocon. No person with an ounce of education in international relations could deny that. Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #22

On foreign policy, Hillary has the support of Henry Kissinger and Robert Kagan (neo-con). stillwaiting Feb 2016 #25

Why? You want them recommending a GOP candidate? Hortensis Feb 2016 #31

If you don't know why that should be troubling for people who vote for Democrats stillwaiting Feb 2016 #36

That's right, liberals are even more immoral than we're stupid. Hortensis Feb 2016 #40

You sputter outrage quite a bit. And you insist that opposition cali Feb 2016 #46

This is where you are wrong Trajan Feb 2016 #35

Correct. H2O Man Feb 2016 #55

Neocons despise her and charge her as an enemy. That should make you wonder. Hortensis Feb 2016 #57

Right.....sure....... daleanime Feb 2016 #51

And what definition H2O Man Feb 2016 #53

Note: for an accurate H2O Man Feb 2016 #56

Excellent post, thanks. Hortensis Feb 2016 #58

This describes Hillary pretty well. Maedhros Feb 2016 #54

If Hillary wins, the corruption of the Dem. Party will be so entrenched it will not be salvageable. Skwmom Feb 2016 #4

+1 RiverLover Feb 2016 #5

And if proven to be unsalvageable VulgarPoet Feb 2016 #6

They won't be Democrats - it will have to be a new party. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #9

And Dickie Scaif smiles from his grave. Or Hell, some assume. Hortensis Feb 2016 #59

A coherent description, so often I have tried to explain this is not about "free stuff". Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #8

Thank you, jefferson cali Feb 2016 #11

Obama equals game changer. Hortensis Feb 2016 #60

If Clinton were doing well on her own I don't think Obama would have felt the need to Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #61

I wouldn't be proud of promising "disturbance," Jefferson. Hortensis Feb 2016 #64

No, I meant what I said, to disturb/to upset the complacent status quo and have them Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #65

Complacent status quo? I almost never say this, but Hortensis Feb 2016 #66

It's ok, we can disagree. We both want the same things, how we get there and who Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #67

Sure. Hortensis Feb 2016 #68

Yep Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #69

Yes, We Want Our Party Back. Pandora's Box has been opened, unfortunately libdem4life Feb 2016 #10

We HAVE our party back! Where have you been? Hortensis Feb 2016 #62

Benjamin Franklin would so approve Bernie Sanders Divernan Feb 2016 #12

It's been brewing at least since the Occupy movement... Helen Borg Feb 2016 #13

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #14

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #15

I see just the opposite happening under a President Sanders Yavin4 Feb 2016 #19

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #29

Except that Sanders would remind them that they still have more to do zalinda Feb 2016 #30

Yes. n/t Orsino Feb 2016 #16

For the sake of our grandchildren PWPippin Feb 2016 #17

Your post is the exact reason why I'm against Bernie Yavin4 Feb 2016 #18

You underestimate how badly people want change in this country. We will fight for it. RiverLover Feb 2016 #20

Perhaps a small precent, but not the majority. What you see now is only the beginning. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #21

"Support for Sanders" does not translate into support for a progressive agenda Yavin4 Feb 2016 #41

It doesn't? Then please present evidence of such, right now you have an opinion, Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #42

Most of the people following him are anti-Hillary, anti-establishment, wanting to be part of Yavin4 Feb 2016 #43

There are two candidates on our side, both sanctioned by the Democratic Party. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #44

Huh? 2banon Feb 2016 #45

Look at the map from the 2014 MI Governor race. Yavin4 Feb 2016 #48

Baloney. You have zero evidence for your claims. cali Feb 2016 #47

See my post at #48. Yavin4 Feb 2016 #49

PERFECT synopsis, Bookmarking for future ref! ALBliberal Feb 2016 #23

thank you very much. cali Feb 2016 #28

I AM NOT mountain grammy Feb 2016 #24

It's about restoring The New Deal SHRED Feb 2016 #26

+1,000,000 ... nt Trajan Feb 2016 #37

That's right. Volaris Feb 2016 #27

It isn't about purity tests? Does DU know this? LonePirate Feb 2016 #32

Kicked and recommended. Thanks! Duval Feb 2016 #33

Where was occupy in the last non presidential election? workinclasszero Feb 2016 #34

OWS did not have a US Senate leader, among other organizational deficits. Jefferson23 Feb 2016 #39

Excellent...this is the best post of the year in GD:P... First Speaker Feb 2016 #38

well said cali azurnoir Feb 2016 #50

Thanks, azurnoir cali Feb 2016 #52

Thank you for helping change the conversation. Utopian Leftist Feb 2016 #63