2016 Postmortem

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)

52. Meh n/t

Reply to Babel_17 (Reply #51)

Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:14 PM

Feb 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lest we forget: 312 hours since Hillary started looking into releasing her transcripts. [View all] Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 OP

I am sure she is almost ready to....... Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #1

Yeah she wonders why nobody trusts her Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #2

Has she even mentioned it again? Has the media even asked her how her 'looking into it' has gone? Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #3

She's hoping we forgot. 840high Feb 2016 #33

she is probably right Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #42

If she waits until the general, she jeopardizes the Democratic party. Gregorian Feb 2016 #4

That's OK. She believes she's worth it. RufusTFirefly Feb 2016 #17

There's a reason for that Dragonfli Feb 2016 #22

Maybe the team the tobacco companies hired to look into cancer connections is being used Babel_17 Feb 2016 #5

She already said yes cosmicone Feb 2016 #6

That would seem to be a dodge, no? Hillary Clinton should lead by example. Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #7

No -- it is called fairness cosmicone Feb 2016 #8

Hillary was asked to release one specific set of transcripts over a specific issue with a specific Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #9

Hillary shouldn't be singled out - it is unfair. cosmicone Feb 2016 #10

You can dodge and shout out silly things all you want, the fact remains.... Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #11

I am serious cosmicone Feb 2016 #14

Ok, Champ Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #15

Illogical argument. Old Crow Feb 2016 #34

By the way, you can probably stop Rubio-ing "communist/socialist" over and over�not too many Gene Debs Feb 2016 #36

Hillary should use that the next time the transcripts come up. frylock Feb 2016 #13

If there are transcripts of a Sanders speech she'd like to see, let her offer a trade in the debate Babel_17 Feb 2016 #19

What makes you think Bernie has any transcripts of any meetings anywhere? Live and Learn Feb 2016 #23

Red Scare Joe McCarthy called - he wants the 1950's back! Divernan Feb 2016 #32

She told a questioner she'd look into it Babel_17 Feb 2016 #16

Later, on Rachel Maddow show she said she would if everyone would n/t cosmicone Feb 2016 #47

If everyone would what? The request to Clinton is specific. Can't she be specific in return? Babel_17 Feb 2016 #48

It is fairness -- why should Clinton be held to something that cosmicone Feb 2016 #49

Let her ask for a specific speech, like Sanders, Cooper, and others have Babel_17 Feb 2016 #51

Meh n/t cosmicone Feb 2016 #52

"Specificity" Is NOT In Hillary's DNA! CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #64

What was that? Lordquinton Feb 2016 #37

Thats a good looking Shepherd. Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #46

Thanks Lordquinton Feb 2016 #58

that is not what she said Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #43

tick-tock frylock Feb 2016 #12

She knows the transcripts will kill her. No way she releases them. Nt Logical Feb 2016 #18

Check out the Vanity Fair article, if you haven't already Babel_17 Feb 2016 #20

Wow! Scary actually! Nt Logical Feb 2016 #21

And they will, in the General Election if she gets that far. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #24

I wonder who has access to the transcripts, Babel_17 Feb 2016 #27

Only she does, per the contract. But there were plenty of witnesses there and they are bound Live and Learn Feb 2016 #31

"Smooch smooch smooch smooch smooch!" Old Crow Feb 2016 #35

Tick-Tock... AzDar Feb 2016 #25

Thanks for the remind. nt Nyan Feb 2016 #26

While you are waiting.. lasttrip Feb 2016 #28

Time has come today Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #38

LOL! MrMickeysMom Feb 2016 #62

Thanks! lasttrip Feb 2016 #65

Any minute now... Fairgo Feb 2016 #29

Why do I feel like they probably have this similar named type thread over at freeperville? TeamPooka Feb 2016 #30

You really don't understand the vetting of candidates in primaries, do you? Peace Patriot Feb 2016 #39

When the GOP throws a stick you chase it for them. fake issue, like getting all her emails for them. TeamPooka Feb 2016 #40

yes, because we all know the fbi takes orders from freepers restorefreedom Feb 2016 #44

Is that even still a thing? Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #45

Like we have threads laughing at some of their candidates, as do they? Babel_17 Feb 2016 #50

Thanks for letting us know it has been only 11 days whistler162 Feb 2016 #41

Kick. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #53

They're working on redactions. EndElectoral Feb 2016 #54

Hillary's watching from a window upstairs oasis Feb 2016 #55

Well you got a response of sorts. Warren Stupidity Feb 2016 #56

The Other side will not forget DVRacer Feb 2016 #57

There is a video of one of her Goldman speeches BainsBane Feb 2016 #59

still waiting ... AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #60

Apparently she's not so great at getting shit done after all. bunnies Feb 2016 #61

If only she took this amount of time TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #63