Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: can we agree: long lines causing people to leave without voting is a scandal? [View all]MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)19. If this was an election, you would be correct. This is a CAUCUS.
So no, if they are not willing to stick around through the entire process, too friggin bad. Their support for the candidate is not deep enough.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
can we agree: long lines causing people to leave without voting is a scandal? [View all]
geek tragedy
Feb 2016
OP
Anyone Remember The 2000 Election? The Establishment/Clinton Folks Are No Different
CorporatistNation
Feb 2016
#34
I made calls for the Bernie campaign on Friday. A lot of people could not caucus because
JDPriestly
Feb 2016
#125
Yes. They're designed to produce long lines which not everyone has time for.
Eric J in MN
Feb 2016
#99
If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. ~Emma Goldman (a real Socialist :) - nt
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2016
#17
You only have a say in how YOUR state party operates, and only if you're active in the party.
MohRokTah
Feb 2016
#53
No, because some people have jobs they can't risk skipping, kids they have no one to take care
tblue37
Feb 2016
#74
You have no say in how Nevada chooses it's delegates to the Democratic National Convention
MohRokTah
Feb 2016
#44
he isn't claiming he has a say in it. your arguments sound like Donald trump bringing
JI7
Feb 2016
#50
For some people taking time off work means being jobless the next day--and even crappy
tblue37
Feb 2016
#88
They should have arranged for time off if their support had been deep enough.
MohRokTah
Feb 2016
#72
A Caucus measures depth of support. How much committment one has for their candidate.
MohRokTah
Feb 2016
#83
When the precinct is in total chaos and you can't even get in to exercise your depth of support,
Karma13612
Feb 2016
#87
If that is the case, each candidate should just pick one supporter to represent them.
bobbobbins01
Feb 2016
#136
no discussions being allowed at NV caucus sites - Hillary voters need to get back to work
SoLeftIAmRight
Feb 2016
#11
Definitely. But this is America. Voting is for lip service only. The process is rigged wherever it
valerief
Feb 2016
#30
Blame the state parties and legislatures who refuse to pay for official primary elections & ballots
LonePirate
Feb 2016
#32
Yes. It is complete bullshit. This is the third states where bullshit has ocuured.
CentralMass
Feb 2016
#55
Who likes caucuses? But she winning by 4% which is a solid win, not a nail biter.
kstewart33
Feb 2016
#75
Absolutely. I wish all states would scrap caucuses and go the primary route.
Metric System
Feb 2016
#80
No, we can't agree. That has happened everywhere in every election. People in Harlem back....
George II
Feb 2016
#89
Outrageous. Time to push orgs and office holders to make election protection a priority...
pat_k
Feb 2016
#97
Caucuses are undemocratic and I am not surprised to see who is in favor of that here. nt
RedCappedBandit
Feb 2016
#105
wow, Hillary up by 300 points.. seriously folks, these caucuses are a riot!
secondwind
Feb 2016
#111
One of them should sue and get this declared unconstitutional disenfranchisement.
Liberty Belle
Feb 2016
#134